Skip to main content

Urethra

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Clinical Regenerative Medicine in Urology
  • 1098 Accesses

Abstract

Replacing urethral tissue with functional scaffolds has been one of the challenges in the field of urethral reconstruction or repair over the last few decades. Various scaffold materials have been used in animal studies, but clinical studies in the use of scaffolds for urethral repair are scarce. It was found that in both animal and clinical studies, scaffolds seeded with cells were used for repair of large segmental defects of the urethra, such as in tubular urethroplasty. When the defect area was small, cell-free scaffolds were more likely to be applied. A large amount of pre-clinical and limited clinical evidence showed that natural or artificial materials could be used as scaffolds for urethral repair. Urinary tissue engineering is still in the immature stage, and the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of scaffolds must be evaluated to allow further study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bhatnagar A, Upadhyaya VD, Kumar B. Congenital urethrocutaneous fistula: case report with review of literature. Indian J Plast Surg. 2012;45:563–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Elgammal MA. Straddle injuries to the bulbar urethra: management and outcome in 53 patients. Int Braz J Urol. 2009;35:450–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim BS, Kwon TG. Urethral reconstruction using autologous vein grafts for the management of urethral strictures. Curr Urol Rep. 2015;16:467.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Macedo A Jr, Rondon A, Ortiz V. Hypospadias. Curr Opin Urol. 2012;22:447–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chapple C. Anterior urethral surgery: current concepts and future directions. Eur Urol. 2010;58:42–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chapple C, Andrich D, Atala A, Barbagli G, Cavalcanti A, Kulkarni S, et al. SIU/ICUD consultation on urethral strictures: the management of anterior urethral stricture disease using substitution urethroplasty. Urology. 2014;83:S31–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Morey AF, Watkin N, Shenfeld O, Eltahawy E, Giudice C. SIU/ICUD consultation on urethral strictures: anterior urethra--primary anastomosis. Urology. 2014;83:S23–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fenton AS, Morey AF, Aviles R, Garcia CR. Anterior urethral strictures: etiology and characteristics. Urology. 2005;65:1055–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tritschler S, Roosen A, Fullhase C, Stief CG, Rubben H. Urethral stricture: etiology, investigation and treatments. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2013;110:220–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Lumen N, Hoebeke P, Willemsen P, De Troyer B, Pieters R, Oosterlinck W. Etiology of urethral stricture disease in the 21st century. J Urol. 2009;182:983–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chapple C, Barbagli G, Jordan G, Mundy AR, Rodrigues-Netto N, Pansadoro V, et al. Consensus statement on urethral trauma. BJU Int. 2004;93:1195–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bhandari M, Dubey D, Verma BS. Dorsal or ventral placement of the preputial/penile skin onlay flap for anterior urethral strictures:does it make a difference? BJU Int. 2001;88:39–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kozinn SI, Harty NJ, Zinman L, Buckley JC. Management of complex anterior urethral strictures with multistage buccal mucosa graft reconstruction. Urology. 2013;82:718–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Barbagli G, Lazzeri M. Penile urethral stricture reconstruction--flap or graft? Graft. J Urol. 2011;186:375–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Venn SN, Mundy AR. Urethroplasty for balanitis xerotica obliterans. Br J Urol. 1998;81:735–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Xu YM, Xu QK, Fu Q, Sa YL, Zhang J, Song LJ, et al. Oral complications after lingual mucosal graft harvesting for urethroplasty in 110 cases. BJU Int. 2011;108:140–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cattan V, Bernard G, Rousseau A, Bouhout S, Chabaud S, Auger FA, et al. Mechanical stimuli-induced urothelial differentiation in a human tissue-engineered tubular genitourinary graft. Eur Urol. 2011;60:1291–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Xie M, Song L, Wang J, Fan S, Zhang Y, Xu Y. Evaluation of stretched electrospun silk fibroin matrices seeded with urothelial cells for urethra reconstruction. J Surg Res. 2013;184:774–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Orabi H, AbouShwareb T, Zhang Y, Yoo JJ, Atala A. Cell-seeded tubularized scaffolds for reconstruction of long urethral defects: a preclinical study. Eur Urol. 2013;63:531–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chun SY, Kim BS, Kwon SY, Park SI, Song PH, Yoo ES, et al. Urethroplasty using autologous urethral tissue-embedded acellular porcine bladder submucosa matrix grafts for the management of long-segment urethral stricture in a rabbit model. J Korean Med Sci. 2015;30:301–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ahn HH, Kim KS, Lee JH, Lee MS, Song IB, Cho MH, et al. Porcine small intestinal submucosa sheets as a scaffold for human bone marrow stem cells. Int J Biol Macromol. 2007;41:590–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Narayanan K, Leck KJ, Gao S, Wan AC. Three-dimensional reconstituted extracellular matrix scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2009;30:4309–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ng SL, Narayanan K, Gao S, Wan AC. Lineage restricted progenitors for the repopulation of decellularized heart. Biomaterials. 2011;32:7571–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bazeed MA, Thuroff JW, Schmidt RA, Tanagho EA. New treatment for urethral strictures. Urology. 1983;21:53–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Olsen L, Bowald S, Busch C, Carlsten J, Eriksson I. Urethral reconstruction with a new synthetic absorbable device. An experimental study. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1992;26:323–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Atala A, Vacanti JP, Peters CA, Mandell J, Retik AB, Freeman MR. Formation of urothelial structures in vivo from dissociated cells attached to biodegradable polymer scaffolds in vitro. J Urol. 1992;148:658–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen F, Yoo JJ, Atala A. Acellular collagen matrix as a possible "off the shelf" biomaterial for urethral repair. Urology. 1999;54:407–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sievert KD, Tanagho EA. Organ-specific acellular matrix for reconstruction of the urinary tract. World J Urol. 2000;18:19–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Micol LA, Arenas da Silva LF, Geutjes PJ, Oosterwijk E, Hubbell JA, Feitz WF, et al. In-vivo performance of high-density collagen gel tubes for urethral regeneration in a rabbit model. Biomaterials. 2012;33:7447–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Atala A. Regenerative medicine strategies. J Pediatr Surg. 2012;47:17–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Atala A. Tissue engineering of reproductive tissues and organs. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:21–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Micol LA, Ananta M, Engelhardt EM, Mudera VC, Brown RA, Hubbell JA, et al. High-density collagen gel tubes as a matrix for primary human bladder smooth muscle cells. Biomaterials. 2011;32:1543–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ribeiro-Filho LA, Sievert KD. Acellular matrix in urethral reconstruction. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2015;82-83:38–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Atala A, Guzman L, Retik AB. A novel inert collagen matrix for hypospadias repair. J Urol. 1999;162:1148–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. El-Kassaby AW, Retik AB, Yoo JJ, Atala A. Urethral stricture repair with an off-the-shelf collagen matrix. J Urol. 2003;169:170–3. discussion 3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. el-Kassaby A, AbouShwareb T, Atala A. Randomized comparative study between buccal mucosal and acellular bladder matrix grafts in complex anterior urethral strictures. J Urol. 2008;179:1432–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Feng C, Xu YM, Fu Q, Zhu WD, Cui L, Chen J. Evaluation of the biocompatibility and mechanical properties of naturally derived and synthetic scaffolds for urethral reconstruction. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010;94:317–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. le Roux PJ. Endoscopic urethroplasty with unseeded small intestinal submucosa collagen matrix grafts: a pilot study. J Urol. 2005;173:140–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Palminteri E, Berdondini E, Colombo F, Austoni E. Small intestinal submucosa (SIS) graft urethroplasty: short-term results. Eur Urol. 2007;51:1695–701. discussion 701

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Palminteri E, Berdondini E, Fusco F, De Nunzio C, Salonia A. Long-term results of small intestinal submucosa graft in bulbar urethral reconstruction. Urology. 2012;79:695–701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sievert KD, Bakircioglu ME, Nunes L, Tu R, Dahiya R, Tanagho EA. Homologous acellular matrix graft for urethral reconstruction in the rabbit: histological and functional evaluation. J Urol. 2000;163:1958–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Lin J, Hao JR, Jin J, Deng SM, Hu J, Na YQ. Homologous dermal acellular matrix graft for urethral reconstruction in man (report of 16 cases). Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2005;85:1057–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Fossum M, Svensson J, Kratz G, Nordenskjold A. Autologous in vitro cultured urothelium in hypospadias repair. J Pediatr Urol. 2007;3:10–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Williams DF. Biomaterials and biocompatibility. Med Prog Technol. 1976;4:31–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Freed LE, Vunjak-Novakovic G, Biron RJ, Eagles DB, Lesnoy DC, Barlow SK, et al. Biodegradable polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biotechnology (N Y). 1994;12:689–93.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Mikos AG, Lyman MD, Freed LE, Langer R. Wetting of poly(L-lactic acid) and poly(DL-lactic-co-glycolic acid) foams for tissue culture. Biomaterials. 1994;15:55–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Harris LD, Kim BS, Mooney DJ. Open pore biodegradable matrices formed with gas foaming. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998;42:396–402.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Han D, Gouma PI. Electrospun bioscaffolds that mimic the topology of extracellular matrix. Nanomedicine. 2006;2:37–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Lee SJ, Oh SH, Liu J, Soker S, Atala A, Yoo JJ. The use of thermal treatments to enhance the mechanical properties of electrospun poly(epsilon-caprolactone) scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2008;29:1422–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Raya-Rivera A, Esquiliano DR, Yoo JJ, Lopez-Bayghen E, Soker S, Atala A. Tissue-engineered autologous urethras for patients who need reconstruction: an observational study. Lancet. 2011;377:1175–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Kanatani I, Kanematsu A, Inatsugu Y, Imamura M, Negoro H, Ito N, et al. Fabrication of an optimal urethral graft using collagen-sponge tubes reinforced with Copoly(L-lactide/epsilon-caprolactone) fabric. Tissue Eng. 2007;13:2933–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Fu WJ, Xu YD, Wang ZX, Li G, Shi JG, Cui FZ, et al. New ureteral scaffold constructed with composite poly(L-lactic acid)-collagen and urothelial cells by new centrifugal seeding system. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2012;100:1725–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Horst M, Madduri S, Milleret V, Sulser T, Gobet R, Eberli D. A bilayered hybrid microfibrous PLGA--acellular matrix scaffold for hollow organ tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2013;34:1537–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Bhargava S, Patterson JM, Inman RD, MacNeil S, Chapple CR. Tissue-engineered buccal mucosa urethroplasty-clinical outcomes. Eur Urol. 2008;53:1263–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Fossum M, Skikuniene J, Orrego A, Nordenskjold A. Prepubertal follow-up after hypospadias repair with autologous in vitro cultured urothelial cells. Acta Paediatr. 2012;101:755–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. De Filippo RE, Yoo JJ, Atala A. Urethral replacement using cell seeded tubularized collagen matrices. J Urol. 2002;168:1789–92. discussion 92-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Li C, Xu YM, Song LJ, Fu Q, Cui L, Yin S. Urethral reconstruction using oral keratinocyte seeded bladder acellular matrix grafts. J Urol. 2008;180:1538–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Fu Q, Deng CL, Song XF, Xu YM. Long-term study of male rabbit urethral mucosa reconstruction using epidermal cell. Asian J Androl. 2008;10:719–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Feng C, Xu YM, Fu Q, Zhu WD, Cui L. Reconstruction of three-dimensional neourethra using lingual keratinocytes and corporal smooth muscle cells seeded acellular corporal spongiosum. Tissue Eng Part A. 2011;17:3011–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Kropp BP, Ludlow JK, Spicer D, Rippy MK, Badylak SF, Adams MC, et al. Rabbit urethral regeneration using small intestinal submucosa onlay grafts. Urology. 1998;52:138–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Nuininga JE, van Moerkerk H, Hanssen A, Hulsbergen CA, Oosterwijk-Wakka J, Oosterwijk E, et al. Rabbit urethra replacement with a defined biomatrix or small intestinal submucosa. Eur Urol. 2003;44:266–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Yang SX, Yao Y, Hu YF, Song C, Wang LL, Jin HM. Reconstruction of rabbit urethra using urethral extracellular matrix. Chin Med J. 2004;117:1786–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Huang X, Luo J, Liao Y, Qu Y, Yang Z. Study on small intestinal submucosa as repair materials in urethral reconstruction. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2006;20:206–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Dorin RP, Pohl HG, De Filippo RE, Yoo JJ, Atala A. Tubularized urethral replacement with unseeded matrices: what is the maximum distance for normal tissue regeneration? World J Urol. 2008;26:323–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Villoldo GM, Loresi M, Giudice C, Damia O, Moldes JM, DeBadiola F, et al. Histologic changes after urethroplasty using small intestinal submucosa unseeded with cells in rabbits with injured urethra. Urology. 2013;81:1380 e1-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Chung YG, Tu D, Franck D, Gil ES, Algarrahi K, Adam RM, et al. Acellular bi-layer silk fibroin scaffolds support tissue regeneration in a rabbit model of onlay urethroplasty. PLoS One. 2014;9:e91592.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Kajbafzadeh AM, Sabetkish S, Tourchi A, Amirizadeh N, Afshar K, Abolghasemi H, et al. The application of tissue-engineered preputial matrix and fibrin sealant for urethral reconstruction in rabbit model. Int Urol Nephrol. 2014;46:1573–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Mantovani F, Trinchieri A, Castelnuovo C, Romano AL, Pisani E. Reconstructive urethroplasty using porcine acellular matrix. Eur Urol. 2003;44:600–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Donkov II, Bashir A, Elenkov CH, Panchev PK. Dorsal onlay augmentation urethroplasty with small intestinal submucosa: modified Barbagli technique for strictures of the bulbar urethra. Int J Urol. 2006;13:1415–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Hauser S, Bastian PJ, Fechner G, Muller SC. Small intestine submucosa in urethral stricture repair in a consecutive series. Urology. 2006;68:263–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Fiala R, Vidlar A, Vrtal R, Belej K, Student V. Porcine small intestinal submucosa graft for repair of anterior urethral strictures. Eur Urol. 2007;51:1702–8. discussion 8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Farahat YA, Elbahnasy AM, El-Gamal OM, Ramadan AR, El-Abd SA, Taha MR. Endoscopic urethroplasty using small intestinal submucosal patch in cases of recurrent urethral stricture: a preliminary study. J Endourol. 2009;23:2001–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Gu GL, Zhu YJ, Xia SJ, Zhang J, Jiang JT, Hong Y, et al. Peritoneal cavity as bioreactor to grow autologous tubular urethral grafts in a rabbit model. World J Urol. 2010;28:227–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Gu GL, Xia SJ, Zhang J, Liu GH, Yan L, Xu ZH, et al. Tubularized urethral replacement using tissue-engineered peritoneum-like tissue in a rabbit model. Urol Int. 2012;89:358–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Li H, Xu Y, Xie H, Li C, Song L, Feng C, et al. Epithelial-differentiated adipose-derived stem cells seeded bladder acellular matrix grafts for urethral reconstruction: an animal model. Tissue Eng Part A. 2014;20:774–84.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Wang F, Liu T, Yang L, Zhang G, Liu H, Yi X, et al. Urethral reconstruction with tissue-engineered human amniotic scaffold in rabbit urethral injury models. Med Sci Monit. 2014;20:2430–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. De Filippo RE, Kornitzer BS, Yoo JJ, Atala A. Penile urethra replacement with autologous cell-seeded tubularized collagen matrices. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2015;9:257–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Mikami H, Kuwahara G, Nakamura N, Yamato M, Tanaka M, Kodama S. Two-layer tissue engineered urethra using oral epithelial and muscle derived cells. J Urol. 2012;187:1882–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Li C, Xu YM, Liu ZS, Li HB. Urethral reconstruction with tissue engineering and RNA interference techniques in rabbits. Urology. 2013;81:1075–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Xie M, Xu Y, Song L, Wang J, Lv X, Zhang Y. Tissue-engineered buccal mucosa using silk fibroin matrices for urethral reconstruction in a canine model. J Surg Res. 2014;188:1–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Osman NI, Patterson JM, MacNeil S, Chapple CR. Long-term follow-up after tissue-engineered buccal mucosa urethroplasty. Eur Urol. 2014;66:790–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Kim BD, Ver Halen JP, Grant DW, Kim JY. Anesthesia duration as an independent risk factor for postoperative complications in free flap surgery: a review of 1,305 surgical cases. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2014;30:217–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Zhang Y, McNeill E, Tian H, Soker S, Andersson KE, Yoo JJ, et al. Urine derived cells are a potential source for urological tissue reconstruction. J Urol. 2008;180:2226–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Bharadwaj S, Liu G, Shi Y, Markert C, Andersson KE, Atala A, et al. Characterization of urine-derived stem cells obtained from upper urinary tract for use in cell-based urological tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part A. 2011;17:2123–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Sievert KD, Selent-Stier C, Wiedemann J, Greiner TO, Amend B, Stenzl A, et al. Introducing a large animal model to create urethral stricture similar to human stricture disease: a comparative experimental microscopic study. J Urol. 2012;187:1101–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Kim BS, Mooney DJ. Development of biocompatible synthetic extracellular matrices for tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol. 1998;16:224–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Silver FH, Pins G. Cell growth on collagen: a review of tissue engineering using scaffolds containing extracellular matrix. J Long-Term Eff Med Implants. 1992;2:67–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Andrich DE, Mundy AR. Non-transecting anastomotic bulbar urethroplasty: a preliminary report. BJU Int. 2012;109:1090–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Kannan RY, Salacinski HJ, Sales K, Butler P, Seifalian AM. The roles of tissue engineering and vascularisation in the development of micro-vascular networks: a review. Biomaterials. 2005;26:1857–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Rouwkema J, Rivron NC, van Blitterswijk CA. Vascularization in tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol. 2008;26:434–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Wu S, Wang Z, Bharadwaj S, Hodges SJ, Atala A, Zhang Y. Implantation of autologous urine derived stem cells expressing vascular endothelial growth factor for potential use in genitourinary reconstruction. J Urol. 2011;186:640–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Kulkarni S, Barbagli G, Sansalone S, Lazzeri M. One-sided anterior urethroplasty: a new dorsal onlay graft technique. BJU Int. 2009;104:1150–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Barbagli G, Sansalone S, Djinovic R, Romano G, Lazzeri M. Current controversies in reconstructive surgery of the anterior urethra: a clinical overview. Int Braz J Urol. 2012;38:307–16. discussion 16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yun-Sok Ha .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ha, YS., Kim, TH. (2018). Urethra. In: Kim, B. (eds) Clinical Regenerative Medicine in Urology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2723-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2723-9_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2722-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2723-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics