Abstract
Cyber-physical production systems are highly flexible systems that enable adaptive production processes. In these systems, all participants of the production process possess individual information about themselves and are equipped with sensors, actors, and communication interfaces. They can interact with each other and autonomously develop and execute process relevant decisions. For each component, a standard process sequence and alternative process sequences are defined. If a deviation in the standard process occurs during the production of an individual component, the process participants can interact with each other and autonomously define an appropriate response strategy and execute it by using actors of the participants and the intralogistics. Regardless of the deviation, the manufacturing and assembly process of individual components in cyber-physical production systems can still proceed. For this purpose, process deviations and the response behavior of cyber-physical production systems are analyzed, modeled, and simulated, to illustrate the benefits of cyber-physical production systems and to develop a process deviation management system for actual, physical production systems based on cyber-physical systems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
More information about Industrie 4.0: www.plattform-i40.de.
- 2.
More information about the IIC: www.iiconsortium.org.
References
BMBF: Zukunftsbild Industrie 4.0. http://www.bmbf.de/pubRD/Zukunftsbild_Industrie_40.pdf
Galaske N, Strang D, Anderl R (2015) Process deviations in cyber-physical production systems. Lecture Notes in Engineering and Computer Science: Proceedings of The World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2015, WCECS 2015, 21–23 Oct 2015, San Francisco, USA, pp 1035–1040
Lee EA (2010) CPS foundations. In: Design automation conference (ACM), 737–742 (2010)
acatech: Cyber-physical systems. Driving force for innovation in mobility, health, energy and production. Munich (2011)
Anderl R, Strang D, Picard A, Christ A (2014) Integriertes Bauteildatenmodell für Industrie 4.0. Informationsträger für cyber-physische Produktionssysteme. ZWF 109, pp 64–69
Bauernhansl T, ten Hompel M, Vogel-Heuser B (eds) (2014) Industrie 4.0 in Produktion, Automatisierung und Logistik. Anwendung, Technologien und Migration. Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden
Kagermann H, Wahlster W, Helbig J (2013) Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative Industrie 4.0. Securing the future of German manufacturing industry (2013)
Anderl R, Picard A, Albrecht K (2013) Smart Engineering for Smart Products. In: Abramovici M, Stark R (eds) Smart Product Engineering. Proceedings of the 23rd CIRP Design Conference, Bochum, Germany, March 11th–13th, 2013, pp. 1–10. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2013)
Radziwon A, Bilberg A, Bogers M, Madsen ES (2014) The Smart Factory. Exploring adaptive and flexible manufacturing solutions. Procedia Engineering 69:1184–1190
Strang D (2016) Kommunikationsgesteuerte cyber-physische Montagemodelle. Shaker, Aachen
VDI 3633-1: Simulation of systems in materials handling, logistics and production. Fundamentals. VDI, Düsseldorf (2010)
Strang D, Anderl R (2014) Assembly Process driven Component Data Model in Cyber-Physical Production Systems. Lecture Notes in Engineering and Computer Science: Proceedings of The World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2014, WCECS 2014, 22–24 Oct 2014, San Francisco, USA, pp 947–952 (2014)
Object Management Group (OMG): Unified Modeling Language (OMG UML), Superstructure. Version 2.4.1 (2011)
Weilkiens T (2007) Systems engineering with SysML/UML. Modeling, analysis, design. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington, Mass
Miles R, Hamilton K (2006) Learning UML 2.0. O’Reilly, Sebastopol, CA
Picard A (2015) Integriertes Werkstückinformationsmodell zur Ausprägung werkstückindividueller Fertigungszustände. Shaker, Aachen
Picard A, Anderl R (2014) Integrated component data model for smart production planning. In: Schützer K (ed) Proceedings of the 19th International Seminar on High Technology. Piracicaba, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Mattern F, Mehl H (1989) Diskrete Simulation - Prinzipien und Probleme der Effizienzsteigerung durch Parallelisierung. Informatik Spektrum 12:198–210
Galaske N, Anderl R (2016) Disruption management for resilient processes in cyber-physical production systems. Procedia CIRP 50:442–447
REFA: Methodenlehre der Betriebsorganisation. Hanser, München (1991)
Heil M (1995) Entstörung betrieblicher Abläufe. Deutscher Universitätsverlag, Wiesbaden
Ingemansson A, Bolmsjö GS (2004) Improved efficiency with production disturbance reduction in manufacturing systems based on discrete-event simulation. J Manuf Technol Manage 15:267–279
Knüppel K, Meyer G, Nyhuis P (2014) A universal approach to categorize failures in production. waset.org (eds) Int J Mech Aerosp Ind Mechatron Eng 8:24–28
Meyer G, Knüppel K, Busch J, Jakob M, Nyhuis P (2013) Effizientes Störgrößenmanagement. Ansatz zur Kategorisierung von Störgrößen in der Produktion. Prod Manag 18:49–52
Kamiske GF, Brauer J-P (2008) Qualitätsmanagement von A bis Z. Erläuterungen moderner Begriffe des Qualitätsmanagements. Hanser, München
Hoover SV, Perry RF (1989) Simulation. A problem-solving approach, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Galaske, N., Strang, D., Anderl, R. (2017). Response Behavior Model for Process Deviations in Cyber-Physical Production Systems. In: Ao, SI., Kim, H., Amouzegar, M. (eds) Transactions on Engineering Technologies. WCECS 2015. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2717-8_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2717-8_31
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2716-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2717-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)