Curricula, Coders, and Coding
- 566 Downloads
The study began with collecting official curriculum documents from each state. Bearing in mind that we referenced only the learning objectives or standards in the cognitive domain while ignoring those in the affective domain, the details of the sources of these curricula are as follows.
- Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich…Wittrock, M. C. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing. A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. White Plains, NY: Addison-Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
- Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H., & Krathwohl, D., R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.Google Scholar
- CPDD [Curriculum Planning & Development Division]. (2013). Science syllabus primary 2014. Singapore: CPDD: Ministry of Education. Retrieved from https://www.moe.gov.sg/docs/defaultsource/document/education/syllabuses/sciences/files/science-primary-2014.pdf
- Graham, M., Milanowski, A., & Miller, J. (2012). Measuring and promoting inter-rater agreement of teacher and principal performance ratings. Madison, WI: Center for Educator Compensation Reform, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
- Waddington, D., Nentwig, P., & Schanze, S. (Eds.). (2007). Making it comparable: Standards in science education. Munster, Germany: Waxmann.Google Scholar