Skip to main content

Changes in the Case Study Academic Boards Over Time

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Academic Governance in the Contemporary University
  • 1023 Accesses

Abstract

Part II of this book presents detailed case study research conducted on academic boards within three Australian universities, which concluded in 2012. This chapter draws not only on interview data from the case study academic boards, the principal academic governance body within these universities, but also on extensive historical records from the older two universities in the sample to trace changes in academic board role and function since establishment. The data show substantial shifts, not only in how academic boards are comprised and for how long they meet, but also in the nature of the matters considered and the ways in which that consideration takes place. They are indicative of the significant diminution in academic board role and function that has taken place within Australian universities during this time. However, they also report a very powerful and ongoing symbolic role for academic boards. At the conclusion of the chapter, the Australian data are compared with data and literature reporting changes in academic board equivalent bodies within the UK and the US.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amaral, A., Fulton, O., & Larsen, I. (2003). A managerial revolution. In A. Amaral, V. L. Meek, & I. M. Larsen (Eds.), The higher education managerial revolution (Vol. 3, pp. 275–296). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. (2000). Performativities and fabrications in the education economy: Towards the performative society? [Paper presented as the Frank Tate memorial lecture and keynote address to the AARE Conference (1999: Melbourne)]. Australian Educational Researcher, 27(2), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, J. (2011). Bureaucratic, corporate, market and network governance: Shifting spaces for gender equity in eduational organisations. Gender, Work and Organization, 18(5), 443–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, J., Brennan, Marie, & Zipin, Lew. (2010). Repositioning university governance and academic work: An overview. In J. Blackmore, M. Brennan, & L. Zipin (Eds.), Re-positioning university governance and academic work (pp. 1–16). Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleiklie, I. (2012). Collegiality and hierarchy: Coordinating principles in higher education. In A. R. Nelson & I. P. Wei (Eds.), The global university: Past, present and future perspectives (pp. 85–104). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1979). Symbolic power. Critique of Anthropology, 13(4), 77–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo academicus (P. Collier, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R., Hillyard, S., & Reed, M. (2007). Knowledge, higher education and the new managerialism: The changing management of UK universities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci (Q. Hoare & G. Nowell Smith, Trans.). London: Lawrence and Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloot, B. (2009). Exploring the value of Bourdieu’s framework in the context of institutional change. Studies in Higher Education, 34(4), 469–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, Simon, & Considine, M. (2000). The enterprise university: Power, governance and reinvention in Australia. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moodie, G. C., & Eustace, R. (1974). Power and authority in British universities. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. (1998). Learning to lead in higher education. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, J. (2013). Academic boards: Less intellectual and more academic capital in higher education governance? Studies in Higher Education, 38(9), 1274–1289. doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.619655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, J. (2015). Turning collegial governance on its head: Symbolic violence, hegemony and the academic board. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 36(7), 1017–1035. doi:10.1080/01425692.2014.883916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rytmeister, C. (2009). Governing university strategy: Perceptions and practice of governance and management roles. Tertiary Education and Management, 15(2), 117–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shattock, M. (2006). Managing good governance in higher education. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shattock, M. (2014). University governance in the UK: Bending the traditional model. In M. Shattock (Ed.), International trends in university governance: Autonomy, self-governance and the distribution of authority (pp. 127–144). Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromquist, N. P. (2012). The provost office as key decision-maker in the contemporary US university: Toward a theory of insitutional change. In H. Schuetze, W. Bruneau, & G. Grosjean (Eds.), University governance and reform: Policy, fads, and experience in international perspective (pp. 25–45). New York: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. (2006). ‘Big is beautiful’: Organisational change in universities in the United Kingdom: New models of institutional management and the changing role of academic staff. Higher Education in Europe, 31(3), 251–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitchurch, C., & Gordon, C. (2011). Some implications of a diversifying workforce for governance and management. Tertiary Education and Management, 17(1), 65–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zipin, L., & Brennan, M. (2003). The suppression of ethical dispositions through managerial governmentality: A habitus crisis in Australian higher education. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 6(4), 351–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julie Rowlands .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rowlands, J. (2017). Changes in the Case Study Academic Boards Over Time. In: Academic Governance in the Contemporary University. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2688-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2688-1_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2686-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2688-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics