Skip to main content

Key Issues and Challenges Facing Academic Governance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Academic Governance in the Contemporary University
  • 1083 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter draws from literature and empirical data within the foregoing 10 chapters to present a synthesis of the primary issues and challenges facing academic governance within contemporary Anglophone nations. The chapter commences with a summary of the key changes that have affected academic governance within the past three decades. It then highlights the implications of these changes for the ways in which institutional level academic governance is currently practiced with a particular focus on the potentially problematic intersections between academic board and senior executive responsibilities, the apparent diminution of academic and student voice within academic governance processes, a growing disconnection between academic strategy and academic practice , the potentially symbolic roles of academic governance bodies in academic quality assurance processes and practices and the corporatisation of academic governance . This chapter concludes with the observation that the combined effect of some of these and other challenges for academic governance is the potential for loss of academic control over key areas of academic work such as curriculum and research. In turn, this has implications not only for the integrity and effectiveness of academic governance processes but also for university performance in the most significant areas of its operations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aghion, P., Dewatripont, M., Hoxby, C., Mas-Colell, A., & Sapir, A. (2010). The governance and performance of universities: Evidence from Europe and the US. Economic Policy, 25(61), 7–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altbach, P. G. (2014a). The emergence of a field: Research and training in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 39(8), 1306–1320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altbach, P. G. (2014b). Knowledge for the contemproary university: Higher education as a field of study and training. In L. E. Rumbley, P. G. Altbach, D. A. Stanfield, Y. Shimmi, A. de Gayardon, & R. Chan (Eds.), Higher education: A worldwide inventory of research centres, academic programs and journals and publications (3rd (abridged) ed.). Chestnut Hill, MA: Center for International Higher Education, Boston College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. E. (2010). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. Rotterdam: UNESCO and Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaral, A. (2013). The difficult life of prophets and seers. Higher Education Policy, 26, 463–478. doi:10.1057/hep.2013.29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apkarian, J., Mulligan, K., Rotondi, M., & Brint, S. (2014). Who governs? Academic decision-making in US four-year colleges and universities, 2000–2012. Tertiary Education and Management, 20(2), 151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, I., & Jones, G. A. (2016). Governance of higher education: Global perspectives, theories and practices. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, J. (2007). Taking it on board: Quality audit findings for higher education governance. Higher Education Research and Development, 26(1), 101–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. (2012). Global education inc.: New policy networks and the neo-liberal imaginary. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. (2015). Education, governance and the tyranny of numbers. Journal of Education Policy, 30(3), 299–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bexley, E., James, R., & Arkoudis, S. (2011). The Australian academic profession in transition: Addressing the challenge of reconceptualising academic work and regenerating the academic workforce. Canberra: Department of Employment, Education and Workplace Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, J. (2009). Academic pedagogies, quality logics and performative universities: evaluating teaching and what students want. Studies in Higher Education, 34(8), 857–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, J. (2011). Bureaucratic, corporate, market and network governance: Shifting spaces for gender equity in eduational organisations. Gender, Work and Organization, 18(5), 443–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, J. (2014). ‘Wasting talent’? Gender and the problematics of academic disenchantment and disengagement with leadership. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(1), 86–99. doi:10.1080/07294360.2013.864616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleiklie, I. (2012). Collegiality and hierarchy: Coordinating principles in higher education. In A. R. Nelson & I. P. Wei (Eds.), The global university: Past, present and future perspectives (pp. 85–104). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bleiklie, I., & Byrkjeflot, H. (2002). Changing knowledge regimes, universities in a new research environment. Higher Education, 44(3–4), 519–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolden, R., Jones, S., Davis, H., & Gentle, P. (2015). Developing and sustaining shared leadership in education. London: Leadership Foundation for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnen, M., Hyde, P., Hodgson, D., Bailey, S., & Hassard, J. (2015). Leadership talk: From managerialism to leaderism in health care after the crash. Leadership, 11(4), 451–470. doi:10.1177/1742715015587039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Guildford: IAU/Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates, H., Dobson, I. R., Goedegebuure, L. C. J., & Meek, V. L. (2011). Australia: The changing academic profession—An enCAPsulation. In W. Locke, W. K. Cummings, & D. Fisher (Eds.), Changing governance and management in higher education: The perspectives of the academy (pp. 129–149). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D., & Beerkens, M. (2010). Introduction. In D. Dill & M. Beerkens (Eds.), Public policy for academic quality: Analyses of innovative policy instruments (pp. 1–13). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Duderstadt, J. J. (2004). Governing the twenty-first century university: A view from the bridge. In W. G. Tierney (Ed.), Competing conceptions of academic governance: Negotiating the perfect storm (pp. 137–157). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrare, J., & Apple, M. (2017). Practicing policy networks: Using organisational field theory to examine philanthropic involvement in education policy. In J. Lynch, J. Rowlands, T. Gale, & A. Skourdoumbis (Eds.), Practice theory: Diffractive readings in professional practice and education. Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, O. (2002). Higher education governance in the UK: Change and continuity. In A. Amaral, G. A. Jones, & B. Karseth (Eds.), Governing higher education: National perspectives on institutional governance (Vol. 2, pp. 187–211). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gumport, P. J., Iannozzi, M., Shaman, S., & Zemsky, R. (1997). Trends in United States higher education from massification to post massification. Stanford: National Center for Postsecondary Improvement, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D. (2013). Drawing a veil over managerialism: Leadership and the discursive disguise of the New Public Management. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 45(3), 267–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, L., & Williams, J. (2010a). Fifteen years of quality in higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 16(1), 3–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, L., & Williams, J. (2010b). Fifteen years of quality in higher education (part two). Quality in Higher Education, 16(2), 81–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C., & Peters, G. (2004). The middle aging of new public management: Into the age of paradox? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(3), 267–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, C. (2013). Shifting themes in OECD country reviews of higher education. Higher Education, 66(6), 703–723. doi:10.1007/s10734-013-9630-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krcal, A., Glass, A., & Tremblay, K. (2014). Monitoring and enhancing quality in higher education: Developing a quality framework. In A. Glass (Ed.), The state of higher education 2014 (pp. 19–46). Paris: OECD Higher Education Programme (IMHE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, W. (2014). Shifting academic careers: Implications for enhancing professionalism in teaching and supporting learning. York: Higher Education Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K., & Ivancheva, M. (2015). Academic freedom and the commercialisation of universities: A critical ethical analysis. Ethics and Science and Environmental Politics, 15(6), 1–15. doi:10.3354/esep00160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macfarlane, B. (2014). Challenging leaderism. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(1), 1–4. doi:10.1080/07294360.2014.864590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2014a). Bonfire of the publics? Rebuilding the social foundations of higher education. Paper presented at the 2014 Clark Kerr Lectures, University of California, Berkeley, 7 October 2014. Retrieved 6 Nov 2015, from http://www.cshe.berkeley.edu/events/2014-clark-kerr-lectures

  • Marginson, S. (2014b). The Californian model of higher education in the world. Paper presented at the 2014 Clark Kerr Lectures, University of California, Berkeley, 2 October 2014. Retrieved 6 Nov 2015, from http://www.cshe.berkeley.edu/events/2014-clark-kerr-lectures

  • Marginson, S., & Considine, M. (2000). The enterprise university: Power, governance and reinvention in Australia. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNay, I. (1995). From the collegial academy to corporate enterprise: The changing cultures of universities. In T. Schuller (Ed.), The changing university? (pp. 105–115). Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNay, I. (2015). Leading the autonomous university: Conditioning factors and culture of organisations in the UK, Ukraine and other European contexts. International Journal of Universities and Leadership, 1(1), 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morley, L., & Crossouard, B. (2016). Gender in the neoliberalised global academy: The affective economy of women and leadership in South Asia. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37(1), 149–168. doi:10.1080/01425692.2015.1100529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naidoo, R., & Williams, J. (2014). The neoliberal regime in English higher education: charters, consumers and the erosion of the public good. Critical Studies in Education, 1–16. doi:10.1080/17508487.2014.939098

  • O’Reilly, D., & Reed, M. (2010). Leaderism: An evolution of managerialism in UK public service reform. Public Administration, 88(4), 960–978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, D., & Reed, M. (2011). The grit in the oyster: professionalism, managerialism and leaderism as discourses of UK public services modernization. Organization Studies, 32(8), 1079–1101. doi:10.1177/0170840611416742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, J. (2012). Accountability, quality assurance and performativity: The changing role of the academic board. Quality in Higher Education, 18(1), 97–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, J. (2013a). Academic boards: Less intellectual and more academic capital in higher education governance? Studies in Higher Education, 38(9), 1274–1289. doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.619655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, J. (2013b). The symbolic role of academic boards in university academic quality assurance. Quality in Higher Education, 19(2), 142–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, J. (2015). Present but not counted: The tenuous position of academic board chairs within contemporary university governance. International Journal of Leadership in Education: Theory and Practice, 18(3), 263–278. doi:10.1080/13603124.2014.925978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, J., & Gale, T. (2017). Shaping and being shaped: Extending the relationship between habitus and practice. In J. Lynch, J. Rowlands, T. Gale, & A. Skourdoumbis (Eds.), Practice theory: Diffractive readings in professional practice and education. Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. (1994). Strange yet compatible bedfellows: Quality assurance and quality improvement. Australian Universities Review, 37(1), 22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shattock, M. (2014a). The context of ‘modernising’ reforms in university governance. In M. Shattock (Ed.), International trends in university governance (pp. 1–16). Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shattock, M. (2014b). University governance in the UK: Bending the traditional model. In M. Shattock (Ed.), International trends in university governance: Autonomy, self-governance and the distribution of authority (pp. 127–144). Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stensaker, B., & Harvey, L. (2011). Accountability: Understandings and challenges. In B. Stensaker & L. Harvey (Eds.), Accountability in higher education (pp. 7–22). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strathern, M. (2000). The tyranny of transparency. British Educational Research Journal, 26(3), 309–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. (2006). ‘Big is beautiful’: Organisational change in universities in the United Kingdom: New models of institutional management and the changing role of academic staff. Higher Education in Europe, 31(3), 251–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, H. (2015). Blaming the victim: Assessment, examinations, and the responsibilisation of students and teachers in neo-liberal governance. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 1–14. doi:10.1080/01596306.2015.1104854

  • Tricker, B. (2009). Corporate governance principles, policies and practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trow, M. (2007). Reflections on the transition from elite to mass to universal access: Forms and phases of higher education in modern societies since WW II. In J. J. F. Forest & P. G. Altbach (Eds.), International handbook of higher education (pp. 243–280). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zipin, L. (2010). Situating university governance in the ethico-emotive ground tone of post/late times. In J. Blackmore, M. Brennan, & L. Zipin (Eds.), Re-Positioning university governance and academic work (pp. 147–162). Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julie Rowlands .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rowlands, J. (2017). Key Issues and Challenges Facing Academic Governance. In: Academic Governance in the Contemporary University. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2688-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2688-1_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2686-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2688-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics