Abstract
This chapter begins with the claim that conventional serious, strictly syllabus- and goal-oriented teaching does not inspire students with confidence in their own capacity to engage critically and creatively with and contribute to interpretations of literature. It poses the solution of employing a playful pedagogy, via games and props. The chapter initially explores the theoretical background of the concepts of play and playful pedagogy, drawing on early learning and, where available, adult learning contexts, as well as literary and philosophical perspectives on creativity and play. It then argues that by appreciating the playful aspects of both reading and writing, literary study becomes more pleasurable. Johan Huizinga’s notion of poeisis, which ‘proceeds within the play-ground of the mind, in a world of its own which the mind creates for it’ (Huizinga, Homo Ludens: a study of the play-element in culture. Beacon Press, Boston, 1955, p. 119) is central to the argument, as is Donald Winnicott’s notion of the ‘transitional object’ (Winnicott, Int J Psychoanal 34:89–97, 1953). Extrapolating from these theories and from the author’s own teaching experience, the chapter offers a suite of playful activities to enhance playfulness in literary studies in the adult learning context. The possibility of this kind of enhancement can inspire educators to return to this ‘playground of the mind’ to reanimate student engagement with texts, stimulate imaginative thinking and nuanced analyses, as well to provoke a deeper experience of literature.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
From a letter by Franz Kafka to his schoolmate Oskar Pollak, 27 January 1904, cited in Josipovici (1976, p. 12).
- 2.
The author would like to thank Catherine Heath for her comments and suggestions.
References
Anning, A., Cullen, J., & Fleer, M. (2008). Early childhood education: Society and culture (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Auden, W. H. (1976). Squares and oblongs. In J. S. Bruner, A. Jolly, & K. Sylva (Eds.), Play: Its role in development and evolution (pp. 638–640). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
Bakhtin, M. (1930s). диaлoгичecкaя вooбpaжeниe. English Edition: Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays . M. Holquist (Ed.) (trans: Emerson, E. & Holquist, M.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Bérubé, M. (1998). The employment of English: Theory, jobs, and the future of literary studies. New York: New York University Press.
Blake, W. (2000). William Blake: The complete illuminated books. London: Thames & Hudson.
Brown, B. (2001). Thing theory. Critical Inquiry, 28(1), 1–22.
Coleridge, S. T. (1907). In I. Shawcross (Ed.), Biographia Literaria. Oxford: Clarendon.
Connell, J. M. (2000). Aesthetic experiences in the school curriculum: Assessing the value of Rosenblatt’s transactional theory. Journal of Aesthetics Education, 34(1), 27–35.
Connor, S. (1985). Great expectations. In S. Connor (Ed.), Charles Dickens (pp. 109–144). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper Collins.
Dangarembga, T. (2001). Nervous conditions. London: Women’s Press.
Dickens, C. ([1861] 1979). Great expectations. London: Pan.
Dufrenne, M. (1973). The phenomenology of aesthetic experience. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Eagleton, T. (2008). Literary theory: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
Edmiston, B. (2008). Forming ethical identities in early childhood play. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Eliot, T. S. (1921). The sacred wood. London: Faber.
Ellison, R. (1952). Invisible man. New York: Random House.
Erikson, E. (1963). Childhood and society. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
Freud, S. ([1907] 1995). Creative writers and day-dreaming. In: P. Gay (Ed.) The freud reader (pp. 436–443). London: Penguin.
Froebel, F. (1826). Die Menschernerziehung. English edition: Froebel, F. (1887). The education of man. New York: D. Appleton and Company.
Froebel, F. (1840). Allgemeinen deutschen kindergartens. English edition: Froebel, F. (1899). Pedagogics of the Kindergarten. (trans: Jarvis, J.). London: D. Appleton.
Fromberg, D. P. (1987). Play. In P. Monighan-Nourot, B. Scales, J. VanHoorn, & M. Almy (Eds.), Looking at children’s play. New York: Teacher’s College Press.
Fromberg, D. P. (1992). A review of research on play. In C. Seefeldt (Ed.), The early childhood curriculum: A view of current research (pp. 42–84). New York: Teachers’ College Press.
Gekoski, R. (2006). What do we read when we read English? English in Aotearoa, 60, 3–10.
Greene, M. (1995). Teaching for openings. In M. Greene (Ed.), Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts and social change (pp. 109–121). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Greene, M. (2001). Variations on a blue guitar: The Lincoln center institute lectures on aesthetic education. New York: Teachers’ College Press.
Greenfield, P. M. (1994). A theory of the teacher in the learning activities of everyday life. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 117–138). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Greenfield, S. (2008). Perspectives: Who are we becoming? New Scientist, 198 (2656), 48–49.
Griffiths, T. (2007). The humanities and an environmentally sustainable Australia. Australian Humanities Review 43 (December): http://www.australianhumanitiesreview.org/archive/Issue-December-2007/EcoHumanities/EcoGriffiths.html. Accessed 20 Nov 2015.
Harris, P. (2007). Developing an integrated play-based pedagogy in preservice teacher education: A self-study. Studying Teacher Education, 3(2), 135–154.
Heidegger, M. (1971). The Thing (trans: Hofstader, A.) In Poetry, language, thought (pp. 169–180). New York: Harper & Row.
Huizinga, J. (1955). Homo Ludens: A study of the play-element in culture. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Jones, G. (1997). Eleanor reads Emma. In G. Jones (Ed.), Fetish lives (pp. 44–57). Fremantle, Australia: Fremantle Arts Centre Press.
Josipovici, G. (Ed.). (1976). The modern English novel: The reader, the writer and the works. London: Open University Press.
Kant, I. ([1790] 2007). Critique of judgement. New York: Cossimo.
Moyles, J. (1989). Just playing? The role and structure of play in early childhood development. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
Moyles, J. (Ed.). (2010). The excellence of play. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
Moyles, J., & Adams, S. (2001). Statements of entitlement to play: A framework for playful teaching. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Nadeau, M. (1966). Histoire du surréalisme. English Edition: Nadeau, M. (1968). The history of surrealism. (trans: Howard, R.). New York: MacMillan and Co.
Pellegrini, A. D. (1991). Applied child study: A developmental approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Elbaum.
Piaget, J. (1945). La formation du symbole chez l’enfant: imitation, jeu et rêve, image et representation. English edition: Paget, J. (1962). Play, dreams and imitation in childhood (trans: Gattego, C. & Hodgson, F. M.). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Piaget, J. (1962). L’équilibration des structures cognitives: problème central du développement. English edition: Piaget, J. (1985). The equilibration of cognitive structures: The central problem of intellectual development. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Proust, M. (1905). Sur La Lecture. English edition: Proust, M. (1994). On reading. (Trans: Sturrock, J). London: Penguin Syrens.
Schiller, F. ([1875] 1954). On the aesthetic education of man in a series of letters. (trans: Snell, R.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
Shakespeare, W. (1602) 2004. Twelfth night, or what you will. In: E.S. Donno (Ed.). New Cambridge Shakespeare. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Shelley, P. B. ([1821] 1840). Essays, letters from abroad, translations and fragments, volume II. M. Shelley (Ed.). London: Moxon.
Spencer, H. (1873). The principles of psychology. New York: D. Appleton.
Sutton-Smith, B. (1994). Does play prepare the future? In J. H. Goldstein (Ed.), Toys, play and child development (pp. 130–146). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sutton-Smith, B. (1997). The ambiguity of play. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Swift, J. ([1735] 1971). Gulliver’s travels. London: Oxford University Press.
Thomas, C. (2005). Moments of productive bafflement, or defamiliarizing graduate studies in English. Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature, Language Composition and Culture, 5(1), 19–35.
Tolstoy, L. (1869). Boйнa и миpъ. English edition: Tolstoy, L. (1978). War and peace. (trans: Edmonds, R.). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
Turner, V. W. (1982). From ritual to theatre: The human seriousness of play. New York: Performing Arts Journal Publications.
Turner, V. W. (1992). Blazing the trail: Way marks in the exploration of symbols. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.
Van Engen, A. (2005). Reclaiming claims: What English students want from English profs. Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature Language Composition and Culture, 5(1), 5–18.
Vygotsky, L. (1930). Paзум в oбщecтвe. English edition: Vygotsky, Lev. (1978). The role of play in development (trans: Cole, M.) In V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (pp. 92–104). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. (1934). мыcль и язык. English edition: Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. (tans: Kozulin, A.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Winnicott, D. (1953). Transitional objects and transitional phenomena. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 34, 89–97.
Winnicott, D. (1965). The maturational processes and the facilitating environment: Studies in the theory of emotional development. London: Hogarth.
Winnicott, D. (1971). Playing and reality. London: Tavistock Publications.
Woolf, V. ([1919] 1984). “Modern Fiction” In: A. McNeille (Ed.), The essays of Virginia Woolf. Volume 4: 1925 to 1928. London: The Hogarth Press, 1984.
Woolf, V. ([1927] 2006). To the lighthouse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pike, D. (2017). The Playground of the Mind: Teaching Literature at University. In: Lynch, S., Pike, D., à Beckett, C. (eds) Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Play from Birth and Beyond. International Perspectives on Early Childhood Education and Development, vol 18. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2643-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2643-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2641-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2643-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)