Advertisement

Loving Learning: The Value of Play Within Contemporary Primary School Pedagogy

  • Dee O’ConnorEmail author
Chapter
Part of the International Perspectives on Early Childhood Education and Development book series (CHILD, volume 18)

Abstract

This chapter draws on established literature surrounding children’s play and how children learn. It also presents some topic-specific findings from two recent studies. The social changes in how modern children play are drawn from the 2012 Irish Neighbourhood Play Research Project. This study was carried out by researchers from Early Childhood Ireland and IT Sligo during 2012. The team consisted of D. O’Connor, M. McCormack, J. Angus and P. MacLaughlin. The participants included almost 1700 families and 240 communities throughout Ireland. The generational changes in play were a recurring theme within the findings with the vast majority of parents expressing that they had more freedom and more time outdoors than their children do. The parents were also more than twice as likely to have walked to school, playing on the way, as their children are. In addition, the data shows generational differences in engagement with risk, with nature, with scheduled/timetabled extracurricular activities, with homework, with electronics, with creative activities and with traditional play types and games. The case study is drawn from true recounted stories contained within a 2014 life history study on the development of creativity through childhood education (O’Connor, Bright spark and shining star, love me for who i am and who you are: the development of creativity through childhood education. Doctoral Thesis. The University of Sheffield, UK, 2014b). Pedagogical observations based on the case studies showcased in this study also inform the discussion within this chapter and contribute to the conclusion that a pedagogy of play is a very appropriate and worthy medium of supporting the contemporary child’s holistic educational development.

Keywords

Reflective Practice Learning Capacity Play Experience Childhood Play Holistic Development 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ball, D. J. (2002). Playgrounds: Risks, benefits and choices. London: Health and Safety Executive, Middlesex University.Google Scholar
  2. Boden, M. A. (2001). Creativity and knowledge. In A. Craft, B. Jeffrey, & M. Leibling (Eds.), Creativity in education. London: Continuum International.Google Scholar
  3. Broadhead, P. (2004). Early years play and learning: Developing social skills and cooperation. London: Routledge/Falmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruce, T. (2011). Early childhood education. Oxen, UK: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
  5. Bruner, J. (1995). From joint attention to the meeting of minds: An Introduction. In C. Moore & P. Dunham (Eds.), Joint attention: Its origins and role in development (pp. 1–14). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  6. Brussoni, M., Olsen, L. L., Pike, I., & Sleet, D. A. (2012). Risky play and children’s safety: Balancing priorities for optimal child development. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 9(9), 3134–3148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carpenter, C., & Burridge, P. (2013). Natural environments for learning: Effecting change in classrooms and the community. In T. McKenna, M. Cacciattolo, & M. Vicars (Eds.), Engaging the disengaged: Inclusive approaches to teaching the least advantaged (pp. 159–177). Victoria, Canada: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Chappell, K., Craft, A., Burnard, P., & Cremin, T. (2008). Question-posing and question-responding: The heart of ‘Possibility Thinking’ in the early years. Early Years, 28(3), 267–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chesbourg, H. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cozolino, L. (2013). The social neuroscience of education: Optimizing attachment and learning in the classroom. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  11. Cremin, T., Chappell, K., & Craft, A. (2013). Reciprocity between narrative, questioning and imagination in the early and primary years: Examining the role of narrative in possibility thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 9, 135–151. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2012.11.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2002). Flow: The classic work on how to achieve happiness. London: Rider.Google Scholar
  13. Damasio, A. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body, emotion and the making of consciousness. Harcourt Brace. In S. Della Salla & M. Anderson (Eds.), Neuroscience in education: The good, the bad and the ugly (2012). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Della Salla, S. (2012). Neuroscience in Education. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Dweck, C. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  16. Fedewa, A., & Ahn, S. (2011). The effects of physical activity and physical fitness on children’s achievement and cognitive outcomes: A meta-analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 83(3), 521–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fleer, M. (2013). Play in the early years. Victoria, Canada: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fleith, D. S., Renzulli, J. S., & Westberg, K. L. (2002). Effects of a creativity training program on divergent thinking abilities and self-concept in monolingual and bilingual classrooms. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 373–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
  20. Gardner, H., & Rinaldi, C. (2001). Project zero. Making learning visible: Children as individual and group learners. Reggio Emilia, Italy: Reggio Children.Google Scholar
  21. Gerhardt, S. (2004). Why love matters: How affection shapes a baby’s brain. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Glenn, N., Knight, M., Holt, C. J., & Spence, J. C. (2012). Meaning of play among children. Childhood, 20(2), 185–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Henricks, T. (2008). The nature of play. The American Journal of Play, Fall edition, pp. 157–180. http://www.journalofplay.org/sites/www.journalofplay.org/files/pdf-articles/1-2-article-the-nature-of-play.pdf. Accessed 24 Mar 2015.
  24. Humphries, S., & Rowe, S. (2001). Creating a climate for learning at Coombes infant and nursery school. In A. Craft, R. Jeffrey, & M. Leibling (Eds.), Creativity in education (pp. 159–174). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Isenberg, J., & Quisenberry, N. (2002). Play: Essential for all children. A position paper of the Association for Childhood Education International, 79(1), pp. 33–39 (2002). doi: 10.1080/00094056.2002.10522763. Accessed 7 Mar 2014.
  26. Klingberg, T. (2013). The learning brain: Memory and brain development in children. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Little, H. (2006). Children’s risk-taking behaviour: Implications for early childhood policy and practice. International Journal of Early Years Education, 14(2), 141–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Martlew, J., Stephen, C., & Ellis, J. (2011). Play in the primary school classroom? The experience of teachers supporting children’s learning through a new pedagogy. Early Years: An International Research Journal, 31(1), 71–83. doi: 10.1080/09575146.2010.529425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Meltzoff, A. N. (1995). Understanding the intentions of others: Re-enactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children. Developmental Psychology, 31(5), 838–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moiser, W. A. (2013). Addressing the affective domain: What neuroscience says about social/emotional development in early childhood by William A. Mosier. In L. H. Wasserman & D. Zambo (Eds.), Early childhood and neuroscience – Links to development and learning (Series: Educating the young child, Vol. 7, pp. 77–103). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Link.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Montessori, M. (1996). The secret of childhood. London: Sangam Books.Google Scholar
  32. Moss, P., & Petrie, P. (2002). From children’s services to children’s spaces: Public policy, children and childhood. London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  33. O’Connor, D. (2014a). Developing creativity in early childhood: The role of educators. In D. O’Connor (Ed.), Creative engagements with children: Educational tales of the unexpected. Oxford: Inter-Disciplinary Press.Google Scholar
  34. O’Connor, D. (2014b). Bright spark and shining star, love me for who I am and who you are: The development of creativity through childhood education. Doctoral Thesis. The University of Sheffield, UK.Google Scholar
  35. O’Connor, D. (2015). The golden thread: Educator connectivity as a central pillar in the development of creativity through childhood education. An Irish life history study. In Education, 43(1), 3–13.Google Scholar
  36. O’Connor, D., McCormack, M., MacLaughlin, P., Angus, J., & O’Rourke, V. (2014). Playing for high stakes; findings from the Irish neighbourhood play research project and their implications for development. Barcelona, Spain: EduLearn.Google Scholar
  37. Osterman, K. (2000). Students’ need for belonging in the school community. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 323–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rogers, C., & Sawyers, J. (1988). Play in the lives of children. Washington, DC: NAEYC.Google Scholar
  39. Sandseter, E. B. (2007). Risky play among four and five year-olds in preschool. In S. O’Brien, P. Cassidy & H. Schonfeld (Eds.) Vision into practice: Conference proceedings of the CEDCE International Conference 2007. www.cecde.ie/english/conference_2007.php. Accessed 24 Jul 2015.
  40. Sandseter, E. B. (2009). Affordances for risky play in preschool: The importance of features in the play environment. Early Childhood Educational Journal, 36, 439–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schweizer, S. (2009). Under the sky. Playing, working and enjoying adventures in the open air. East Sussex, UK: Sophia Books.Google Scholar
  42. Smith, S. J. (1998). Risk and our pedagogical relation to children: On playground and beyond. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  43. Steiner, R. (1981). The education of the child in the light of anthroposophy. London: Rudolf Steiner Press.Google Scholar
  44. Stephenson, A. (2003). Physical risk taking: Dangerous or endangered? Early Years: Journal of International Research and Development, 23(1), 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sutton-Smith, B. (1997). The ambiguity of play. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Tovey, H. (2007). Playing outdoors: Spaces and places, risk and challenge. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Waters, J., & Begley, S. (2007). Supporting the development of risk-taking behaviours in the early years: An exploratory study. Education, 35(4), 3–13.Google Scholar
  49. Weisberg, D. S., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2013). Guided play: Where curricular goals meet a playful pedagogy. Mind, Brain, and Education, 7, 104–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wood, E. (2009). Play and playfulness in the early years foundation stage. In A. Wilson (Ed.), Creativity in primary education (2nd ed.). Exeter, UK: Learning Matters.Google Scholar
  51. Wood, E., & Attfield, J. (2005). Play, learning and the early childhood curriculum (2nd ed.). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationThe University of Notre Dame AustraliaFremantleAustralia

Personalised recommendations