Skip to main content

Play, Virtue, and Well-Being: Is Consumerist Play a Bad Habit?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Play from Birth and Beyond
  • 2454 Accesses

Abstract

The concept and activity of play has been a recurring theme in ethics and moral philosophy, particularly in the normative theories of natural law and virtue ethics. This paper explores the moral dimensions of consumerist play–forms of play in which objects or means of play are designed to be purchased and consumed–from the perspective of virtue ethics. The paper will test out a hypothesis that consumerist play leads to bad habits of playing and thus hampers or is detrimental to human well-being. As a whole, the chapter intends to provide justification to support the argument that we have genuine grounds for concern that a person whose play is predominately an engagement in consumerist play is likely to fail to grasp the meaning and nature of play and thus fail to appropriately fulfil its function in their attempts at playing. Like a person in the grip of greed, who takes wealth as an end rather than a means, a person in the vice-like grip of consumerist play is likely to take the point of play as a means or object to be consumed rather than to engage in a free exploration of identity, re-creation, and renewal within the context of human well-being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Thomas Aquinas borrows heavily here from Cicero’s On Duties, Book 1.

  2. 2.

    It is important to note that the first use of ‘consumption’ in economic theory appeared earlier than Marx in the writings of Adam Smith and other theorists of Capitalism. Karl Marx, however, appears to have explicitly developed the philosophical-anthropological explanation of the use of the term in economics (Graeber, 2011, p. 492).

References

  • Annas, J. (2000). Ancient philosophy: A very short introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas, T. ([c1265–1274] 1948/1981). Summa Theologiae (The Fathers of the English Dominican Province, Trans.). Notre Dame, IN: Ave Maria Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1998). The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (1995a). De Anima. In J. Barnes (Ed.), The complete works of Aristotle, volume I (J. A. Smith, Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (1995b). Nicomachean ethics. In J. Barnes (Ed.), The complete works of Aristotle, volume II (W. D. Ross, Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (1995c). Politics. In J. Barnes (Ed.), The complete works of Aristotle, volume II (B. Jowett, Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2007). Consuming Life. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caillois, R. (2001). Man, play, and games. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicero. M.T. (1913). On Duties (W. Miller, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, T. (2010). The significance of product longevity. In Longer lasting products: alternatives to the throwaway society. Farnam, NE: Gower Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnis, J. (1980). Natural law and natural rights. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and method. New York: Continuum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graeber, D. (2011). Consumption. Current Anthropology, 52(4), 489–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grisez, G., Boyle, J., & Finnis, J. (1987). Practical principles, moral truth, and ultimate ends. The American Journal of Jurisprudence, 32, 99–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J. A. (2011). Endangered childhoods: How consumerism is impacting child and youth identity. Media Culture Society, 33(3), 347–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huizinga, J. (1980). Homo Ludens: A study in the play-element in culture. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hursthouse, R. (2013). Virtue ethics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, 2013 fall edition. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/ethics-virtue/. Accessed 31 July 2015.

  • MacIntyre, A. (2009). Dependent rational animals: Why human beings need the virtues. London: Duckworth Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1975). Excerpts from James Mill’s elements of political economy. In Early writings. Hammondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1976). Capital (Vol. 1). Hammondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, R. (2009). Ancient ethical theory. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (archives). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2009/entries/ethics-ancient/. Accessed 31 Jul 2015.

  • Patterson, T. C. (2009). Karl Marx, anthropologist. Oxford, UK: Berg Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay, H. (2005). Reclaiming leisure: Art, sport, and philosophy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rojek, C. (2004). The consumerist syndrome in contemporary society: An interview with Zygmunt Bauman. Journal of Consumer Culture, 4(3), 291–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royce, R. (2011). Suits, autotelicity, temporal reallocations, game resources and defining “play”. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, 5(2), 93–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shim, J. K., & Siegl, J. G. (Eds.). (1995). Consumption goods and services. In Dictionary of economics. Oxford, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suits, B. (1977). Words on play. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 4(1), 117–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1999). Playing and reality. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angus Brook .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brook, A. (2017). Play, Virtue, and Well-Being: Is Consumerist Play a Bad Habit?. In: Lynch, S., Pike, D., à Beckett, C. (eds) Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Play from Birth and Beyond. International Perspectives on Early Childhood Education and Development, vol 18. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2643-0_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2643-0_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2641-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2643-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics