Rice-Based Cropping Systems in the Delta of the Vu Gia Thu Bon River Basin in Central Vietnam

  • Rui Pedroso
  • Dang Hoa Tran
  • Viet Quoc Trinh
  • Le Van An
  • Khac Phuc Le
Chapter
Part of the Water Resources Development and Management book series (WRDM)

Abstract

Despite high pressures for agricultural land conversion, increasing competition for water, and the relatively low net benefits of rice production, rice is still by far the predominant farm occupation in the Vu Gia Thu Bon basin in Central Vietnam . This study examined the reasons for such persistence by surveying and analyzing a comprehensive set of qualitative (planting and harvesting dates) and quantitative data (yields , labor and nonlabor inputs, prices) for all the crops present in the cropping systems of 113 farms in the region. The net benefit derived from rice production was on average 23 M VND ha−1, with a relatively low labor input of 144 man-days per ha−1. The net benefits generated by vegetable production are more than 9 times higher (ca. 215 M VND ha−1) with a labor demand of ca. 928 man-days ha−1. Despite the very high net benefits of vegetable production, in this region they do not translate into an equivalently high added value per ha and man-day. These values are ‘only’ nearly double than those for rice, and not much higher than those for watermelon, chili, and groundnut. The results indicate that farmers’ decisions for not rushing in diversifying production to vegetables are wise when looking at the high risks of vegetable production, shortage of on-farm labor resources, and high opportunity costs of nonfarm labor opportunities. Rice is a robust crop and a pillar of families’ food security, demanding low labor inputs. Under current conditions, farmers will most probably continue predominantly cropping rice. There is nevertheless the need to improve the rice system. Technical efficiency of rice production in the delta of the VGTB basin is 78 %, a low figure if compared to recent average estimations of 86 % for the Vietnamese Mekong and Red River deltas. The small scale of production, land fragmentation and irrigation challenges due to salinity intrusion are the main factors impacting on technical efficiency in the region.

References

  1. Battese GE, Coelli TJ (1995) A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Econ 20:325–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Caudill SB, Ford JM (1993) Biases in Frontier estimation due to heteroscedasticity. Econ Lett 41(1):17–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chung NT, Jintrawet A, Promburom P (2015) Impacts of seasonal climate variability on rice production in the central highlands of Vietnam. Agric Agric Sci Procedia 5:83–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ha DT, Thao TD, Khiem NT, Trieu MX, Gerpacio RV, Pingali PL (2004) Maize in Vietnam: production systems, constraints, and research priorities. CIMMYT, Mexico, D.FGoogle Scholar
  5. Hadri K (1999) Estimation of a doubly heteroscedastic stochastic frontier cost function. J Bus Econ Stat 17:359–363Google Scholar
  6. Hansen H, Nguyen T (eds) (2007) Market policy and poverty reduction in vietnam. Vietnam academy of social sciences. Hanoi, Vietnam Culture and Information Publishing HouseGoogle Scholar
  7. Huong PTT, Everaarts AP, Neeteson JJ, Struik PC (2013a) Vegetable production in the Red River Delta of Vietnam. I. Profitability, labour requirement and pesticide use. NJAS-Wageningen J Life Sci 67:27–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Huong PTT, Everaarts AP, Neeteson JJ, Struik PC (2013b) Vegetable production in the Red River Delta of Vietnam. II. Profitability, labour requirement and pesticide use. NJAS-Wageningen J Life Sci 67:37–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jansen HGP, Midmore DJ, Binh PT, Valasayya S, Tru LC (1996) Profitability and sustainability of peri-urban vegetable production systems in Vietnam. Neth J Agric Sci 44:125–143Google Scholar
  10. Kodde DA, Palm F (1986) Wald criteria for jointly testing equality and inequality restrictions. Econometrica 54(5):1243–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kompas T, Che NC, Nguyen HTM, Nguyen HQ (2012) Productivity net returns, and efficiency: land and market reform in vietnamese rice production. Land Econ 88(3):478–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kumbhakar SC, Lovell KCA (2000) stochastic frontier analysis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Linh Vu Hoang (2012) Efficiency of rice farming households in Vietnam. Int J Dev Issues 11(1):66–73Google Scholar
  14. MONRE (Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment) (2009) Climate change, sea level rise scenarios for Vietnam, Hanoi. Available at: http://vgbc.org.vn/vi/nc/169-climate-change-sea-level-rise-scenarios-for-vietnam-2009
  15. Norman DW (1973) Methodology and problems of farm management investigations: experiences from northern Nigeria African Rural Employment Paper 8. Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA 47 ppGoogle Scholar
  16. Pedroso R et al (2017) Cropping systems in the Vu Ghia Thu Bon river basin, Central Vietnam: On farmers’ stubborn persistence in predominantly cultivating rice, NJAS—Wageningen J Life Sci http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2016.11.001
  17. PPC Da Nang (People’s Committee of Da Nang City) (2011) Report on master plan of socio-economic development of Da Nang City in 2020 (Vietnamese language), Da Nang, VietnamGoogle Scholar
  18. PPC Quang Nam (Quang Nam Provincial People’s Committee) (2012) Socio-economic development of Quang Nam Province in the last 15 years (1997–2011) (Vietnamese language). Tam Ky, Vietnam, p 97Google Scholar
  19. Quang PN, van Westen ACM, Zoomers A (2014) Agricultural land for urban development: the process of land conversion in Central Vietnam. Habitat Int 41:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ravallion M, van de Walle D (2001) Breaking up the collective farm: welfare outcomes of Vietnam’s massive land privatization. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2710, The World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  21. Van Hung P, MacAulay TG, Marsh SP (2007) The economics of land fragmentation in the north of Vietnam. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 51(2):195–211Google Scholar
  22. Viet TQ (2014) Estimating the impact of climate change induced salinity intrusion on agriculture in estuaries—the case of Vu Gia Thu Bon, Vietnam. Doctoral dissertation. RUHR University Bochum, Germany, p 175Google Scholar
  23. Wang H, Schmidt P (2002) One-step and two-step estimation of the effects of exogenous variables on technical efficiency levels’. J Prod Anal 18:129–144 (Kluwer Academic Publishers)Google Scholar
  24. World Bank (2003) Vietnam: delivering on its promise: vietnam development report, 2003. HanoiGoogle Scholar
  25. World Bank in collaboration with the Asian Development Bank (2011) Recognizing and reducing corruption risks in land management in Vietnam. HanoiGoogle Scholar
  26. World-Bank, Inflation, consumer prices (annual %) (2016). http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/FP.CPI.TOTL.ZG
  27. The National Publishing House—Su That (2015) MapVietnam. At www.worldbank.org/mapvietnam/ (2016) Inflation, consumer prices (annual %). At: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/FP.CPI.TOTL

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rui Pedroso
    • 1
  • Dang Hoa Tran
    • 2
  • Viet Quoc Trinh
    • 1
  • Le Van An
    • 2
  • Khac Phuc Le
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for Technology and Resources ManagementCologneGermany
  2. 2.Faculty of Agronomy, College of Agriculture and ForestryHue UniversityHueVietnam

Personalised recommendations