Skip to main content

Cancer Chemoprevention: Hurdles and Future Prospects and Considerations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cancer and Chemoprevention: An Overview
  • 657 Accesses

Abstract

The disappointing results of chemoprevention trials in human are certainly of concern. Negative results should not discourage us from looking into the positive effects of chemoprevention. However slight advances in cancer chemotherapy catch the attention of the world, and feeble positive results are also measured considerably, unlike in cancer chemoprevention. Another factor is that expectations from chemoprevention are too high and success is barely observed. If chemoprevention is proposed to be the future therapy for cancer, various other factors are required to be calculated seriously.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adhami VM et al (2013) Human cancer chemoprevention, hurdles and challenges. Top Curr Chem 329:203–220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baron JA, Sandler RS, Bresalier RS et al (2006) A randomized trial of rofecoxib for the chemoprevention of colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterology 131:1674–1682

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett A, Tacca MD, Stamford IF et al (1977) Prostaglandins from tumours of human large bowel. Br J Cancer 35:881–884

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • De S (2011) Food, the omnivore’s labyrinth. Nature 471:S22–S24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmets CA, Viner JL, Pentland AP et al (2010) Chemoprevention of nonmelanoma skin cancer with celecoxib, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 102:1835–1844

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier DB, Gordon GB (2000) COX-2 and colon cancer, potential targets for chemoprevention. J Cell Biochem 34:97–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gasper AV, Al-Janobi A, Smith JA et al (2005) Glutathione S-transferase M1 polymorphism and metabolism of sulforaphane from standard and high glucosinolate broccoli. Am J Clin Nutr 82:1283–1291

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goss PE, Ingle JN, Ales-Martinez JE et al (2011) Exemestane for breast-cancer prevention in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med 364:2381–2391

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guyton KZ, Kensler TW, Posner GH (2003) Vitamin D and vitamin D analogs as cancer chemopreventive agents. Nutr Rev 61:227–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harper CE, Patel BB, Wang J et al (2007) Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate suppresses early stage, but not late stage prostate cancer in TRAMP mice, mechanisms of action. Prostate 67:1576–1589

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampe JW (2009) Is equal the key to the efficacy of soy foods? Am J Clin Nutr 89:1664S–1667S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lampe JW (2010) Emerging research on equol and cancer. J Nutr 140:1369S–1372S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lu H, Meng X, Yang CS (2003) Enzymology of methylation of tea catechins and inhibition of catechol-O-methyltransferase by –.-epigallocatechin gallate. Drug Metab Dispos. The Biological Fate of Chemicals 31:572–579

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhtar H (2012) Chemoprevention, making it a success story for controlling human cancer. Cancer Lett 326(2):123–127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell PM, Wilson M, Elwin CE et al (2010) Long-term effect of aspirin on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality, 20-year follow-up of five randomised trials. Lancet 376:1741–1750

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt C (2011) The breast cancer chemoprevention debate. J Natl Cancer Inst 103:1646–1647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqui IA, Adhami VM, Bharali DJ et al (2009) Introducing nanochemoprevention as a novel approach for cancer control, proof of principle with green tea polyphenol epigallocatechin-3-gallate. Cancer Res 69:1712–1716

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wu AH, Tseng CC, Van Den Berg D et al (2003) Tea intake, COMT genotype, and breast cancer in Asian-American women. Cancer Res 63:7526–7529

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wu X, Lippman SM (2011) An intermittent approach for cancer chemoprevention. Nat Rev Cancer 11:879–885

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wu X, Patterson S, Hawk E (2011) Chemoprevention-history and general principles. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 25:445–459

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rashid, S. (2017). Cancer Chemoprevention: Hurdles and Future Prospects and Considerations. In: Cancer and Chemoprevention: An Overview. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2579-2_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics