Abstract
Intensional logics are formal systems that differentiate an expression’s intension (broadly, its connotation or sense) from its extension (its ordinary referent or denotation).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Of course, scientists now assert that the number of planets is 8 rather than 9. However, the old numbering is assumed here and throughout the rest of this work simply to facilitate discussion of the intensionality literature of the past in which (10) and (11) were popular examples, and it was held that 9 numbered the planets.
References
Anderson, C. A. (1984). General intensional logic. In D. M. Gabbay & F. Guenthner (Eds.), Handbook of philosophical logic (Vol. 2, pp. 355–385). Dordrecht: Reidel.
Arnauld, A. (1964). The Art of Thinking: Port Royal Logic (J. Dickoff & P. James, Trans.). Indianapolis: The Bobbs-Merrill Company.
Bradley, F. H. (1922). The principles of logic (2nd ed.). London: Oxford University Press.
Bealer, G. (1982). Quality and concept. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Carnap, R. (1956). Meaning and necessity (2nd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Church, A. (1951). A formulation of the logic of sense and denotation. In P. Henle, H. H. Kallen, & S. K. Langer (Eds.), Structure, method and meaning: Essays in honor of Henry M. Scheffer (pp. 3–24). New York: Liberal Arts Press.
Cresswell, M. J. (1967). The interpretation of some lewis systems of modal logic. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 45(2), 198–206.
Cresswell, M. J. (1972). Intensional logics and logical truth. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 1(1), 2–15.
Cresswell, M. J. (1985). Structured meanings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Davidson, D. (1984). On saying that. In Inquiries into truth and interpretation (pp. 93–108). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Dennett, D. C. (1999). Intentionality. In R. Audi (Ed.) The Cambridge dictionary of philosophy (p. 441). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Frege, G. (2001). On sense and reference. In A. P. Martinich & D. Sosa (Eds.), Analytic philosophy: An anthology (pp. 7–18). Oxford: Blackwell.
Gallin, D. (1975). Intensional and higher-order modal logic. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.
Garson, J. W. (1998). Intensional logics. In E. Craig (Ed.), Routledge encyclopaedia of philosophy (pp. 807–810). London: Routledge.
Grayling, A. C. (1998). An introduction to philosophical logic (3rd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Jacquette, D. (1999). Extensionalism. In R. Audi (Ed.) The Cambridge dictionary of philosophy (p. 300). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Keynes, J. N. (1928). Studies and exercises in formal logic. London: Macmillan.
Leibniz, G. W. (1976). In H. G. Alexander (Ed.) The Leibniz-Clarke correspondence. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Linsky, L. (1983). Oblique contexts. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Mackie, J. L. (1985). Problems of intentionality. In J. Mackie & P. Mackie (Eds.), Logic and knowledge: Selected papers (Vol. 1, pp. 102–116). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Martin, R. M. (1958). Truth and denotation: A study in semantical theory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Mill, J. S. (1979). A system of logic. London: Longmans.
Montague, R. (1974). Pragmatics and intensional logic. In R. H. Thomason (Ed.), Formal philosophy: Selected papers of Richard Montague (pp. 119–147). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Priest, G. (2005). Towards non-being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Quine, W. V. O. (1971). Reference and modality. In L. Linsky (Ed.), Reference and modality (pp. 17–34). London: Oxford University Press.
Quine, W. V. O. (1981). Intensions revisited. In Theories and things (pp. 113–123). Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.
Scheffler, I. (1963). The anatomy of inquiry. New York: The Bobbs-Merrill Company.
Zalta, E. N. (1988). Intensional logic and the metaphysics of intentionality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Zalta, E. N. (1997). A classically-based theory of impossible worlds. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 38(4), 640–660.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Parsons, D. (2016). Introduction. In: Theories of Intensionality . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2484-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2484-9_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2482-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2484-9
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)