Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

User Interface Design of Digital Textbooks pp 23–42Cite as

A Paradigm Shifths and User Interface Design Models

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 1032 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Educational Technology ((LNET))

Abstract

A paradigm shifts, according to Thomas Kuhn, is a fundamental change in the basic concepts and experimental practices of a scientific discipline. Do paradigm shifts change the design models according to changes in education? The goal of this chapter is to present a comprehensive description of linear, systems and meta-systems thinking approaches. Its scope is limited to the instructional design models and principles of user interface design. The chapter deeply explores the contrasts, connections, and influences from the realm of thinking to the real.

A new type of thinking is essential if mankind to survive

and move toward higher levels.

Albert Einstein

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Angerhofer, B. J., & Angelides, M. C. (2000). System dynamics modelling in supply chain management: research review. In Proceedings of Simulation Conference, 2000, Winter (Vol. 1, pp. 342–351). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. F. Skinner’s Theory. http://www.theoryfundamentals.com/skinner.htm

  • Benjamin, L. T. (1988). A history of teaching machines. American Psychologist, 43(9), 703–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosch, O., & Nguyen, N. (2016). Capacity Building and Think2Impact. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the ISSS-2015 Berlin, Germany (Vol. 1, No. 1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological Models of Human Development. http://www.psy.cmu.edu/~siegler/35bronfebrenner94.pdf

  • Crowder, N. A. (1963). On the differences between linear and intrinsic programing. The Phi Delta Kappan, 44(6), 250–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2001). The systematic design of instruction. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eigen, L. D. (1962). A comparison of three modes of presenting a programmed instruction sequence. The Journal of Educational Research, 55(9), 453–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, N. (2016). Performativity and Metaphor in New Materialist Media theory. networking knowledge. Journal of the MeCCSA Postgraduate Network, 9(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frick, T. W. (1991). Restructuring Education through Technology. Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation. Bloomington: Indiana. https://www.indiana.edu/~tedfrick/fastback/fastback326.html/. Accessed 05.04.16

  • Gilman, D. A. (1972). The origins and development of intrinsic and adaptive programing. Educational Technology Research and Development, 20(1), 64–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ha, T. M., Bosch, O. J., & Nguyen, N. C. (2016). Practical Value of the systems-based evolutionary learning laboratory in solving complex community problems in Vietnam. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the ISSS-2015 Berlin, Germany (Vol. 1, No. 1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, M. Z., & Walker, K. B. (1990). Instructional communication in the televised classroom: The effects of system design and teacher immediacy on student learning and satisfaction. Communication Education, 39(3), 196–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hairston, M. (1982). The winds of change: Thomas Kuhn and the revolution in the teaching of writing. College composition and communication, 33(1): 76–88. http://www.reiffad.com/genre/Hairston.pdf

  • Handani, M., Charbaghi, A., & Sharifuddin, R. S. (2011). Instructional design approaches, types and trends. A foundation for postmodernism instructional design. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(8), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjorth, P., & Bagheri, A. (2006). Navigating towards sustainable development: A system dynamics approach. Futures, 38(1), 74–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • INNEPS. (2016). Productive learning. What is it? http://www.ineps.org/pdf/Productive%20Learning.pdf

  • Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2000). Models of teaching, 6th edn. Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karsvall, A. (2002). Personality preferences in graphical interface design. In Proceedings of the second Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction (pp. 217–218). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klir, G. (1990). Architecture of systems problem solving. New York and Longon: Plenum Press. (In Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazanski, T. J. (2010). Systems thinking: ancient Maya’s evolution of consciousness and contemporary systems thinking. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1303(1), 289–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Wu, M., & Sun, Z. (2014). Extending the TAM model to explore the factors that affect intention to use digital textbooks in primary teachers’ views. Intelligent Environments. Workshop Proceeding of 10th International Conference on Intelligent Environments, 127–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill. D. First Principles of Instruction. http://mdavidmerrill.com/Papers/firstprinciplesbymerrill.pdf

  • Montuori, A. (2012). Reproductive learning. In Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (pp. 2838–2840). Springer, US.

    Google Scholar 

  • New scientist (2014). Digital textbooks adapt to your level as you learn. https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22329832-600-digital-textbooks-adapt-to-your-level-as-you-learn/

  • Richmon, B. (1994) System Dynamics/Systems Thinking: Let’s Just Get On With It, International Systems Dynamics Conference, Sterling, Scotland http://www.iseesystems.com/resources/Articles/SDSTletsjustgetonwithit.pdf

  • Risku, M., Harding, L. (2013). A unified theory. In: M. Risku & L. Harding (Eds.), Education for tomorrow: A Biocen A Biocentric, student-focused model for reconstructing education (pp. 113–134). SensePublishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional science, 18(2), 119–144, http://pdf.truni.sk/e-ucebnice/iktv/data/media/iktvv/Symposium_LTML_Royce%20Sadler_BFormative_Assessment_and_the_design_of_instructional_systems.pdf

  • Schlesinger, P., & Waelde, C. (2011). Performers on the edge [video]. Audiovisual thinking, 2011 (3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1965). Reflection on a decade of teaching machines. Perspectives and Technology. Teaching machine and programed learning. In Glaser, R (Ed.), ERIC: National Education Association, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. U., & Smith, M. F. (1966). Cybernetic principles of learning and educational design. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tchulkina, N. L., & Garbar, O. V. (2016). Secondary Linguocultural Consciousness in the “Instaworld”: Modern Teenager’s World Outlook Forming by Means of the “Picture Creative Thinking” Technology. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7(1), 449–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teal, R. (2010). Developing a (non-linear) practice of design thinking. International Journal of Art & Design Education., 29(3), 294–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Universal Design of Learning. http://www.cast.org/our-work/about-udl.html#.V2ZSnqKPVKA

  • Viegas, F., Wattenberg, M. (2011), How To Make Data Look Sexy. http://articles.cnn.com/2011-04-19/opinion/sexy.data_1_visualization-21st-century-engagement?_s=PM:OPINION

  • Visser, W. (2006). The cognitive artifacts of designing. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Bertalanffy, L. (1972a). The history and status of general systems theory. Academy of Management Journal, 15(4), 407–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Bertalanffy, L. (1972b). The meaning of general system theory. General system theory: Foundations, development, applications, 30–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics: Or control and communication in the animal and the machine. Paris, Cambridge & Massachusetts: Hermann & Cie, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Advanced Study at Moscow State Pedagogical University, Moscow, Russia

    Elena Aurel Railean

  2. European University of Moldova, Chişinău, Moldova

    Elena Aurel Railean

  3. Tiraspol State University, Chişinău, Moldova

    Elena Aurel Railean

Authors
  1. Elena Aurel Railean
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena Aurel Railean .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Railean, E.A. (2017). A Paradigm Shifths and User Interface Design Models. In: User Interface Design of Digital Textbooks. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2456-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2456-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2455-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2456-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation