Skip to main content

Agile Staff Professional Learning for Learning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

A human resource crucial to the success of an agile PBL curriculum and pedagogy is the academic teaching staff who are also known in the PBL literature and field as PBL facilitators. Facilitating or teaching students in an agile PBL environment is hugely important, yet it is a role that is very challenging for many academic staff involved in PBL, regardless of their educational contexts. In this book, we prefer to term this important human resource ‘the agile PBL teacher’, as they are a central element in an agile PBL ecology for learning. Being a facilitator of learning is of utmost importance in any PBL context or curriculum; however, an agile PBL teacher also performs a number of other academic tasks that are equally important, in that they prepare students and induct them into a particular way-of-being and becoming. In this chapter, we explore characteristics deemed important for an agile PBL teacher with a focus on activating (facilitating) student learning and developing. We also discuss academic or faculty development and issues involved in preparing agile PBL teachers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barnett, R. (2013). Imagining the university. Oxon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, T., & Moore, S. (2011). Students maximising the potential of the problem-based learning tutorial. In T. Barrett & S. Moore (Eds.), New approaches to problem-based learning: Revitalising your practice in higher education (pp. 115–129). Milton Park, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrows, H. S. (2002). An overview of authentic problem-based learning. In K. N. L. Wee & Y. C. M. A. Kek (Eds.), Authentic problem-based learning: Rewriting business education (pp. 1–9). Singapore, Singapore: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovill, C., & Martensson, K. (2014). The challenge of sustaining academic development work. International Journal for Academic Development, 19(4), 263–267. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2014.969981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chng, E., Yew, E. H. J., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). Effects of tutor-related behaviours on the process of problem-based learning. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 16(4), 491–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuprina, L., & Zaher, L. (2011). Successful learning and teaching approaches: Self-reflection as a bridge to self-directed and lifelong learning. In K. D. Kirstein, J. M. Hinrichs, & S. G. Olswang (Eds.), Authentic instruction and online delivery: Proven practices in higher education (pp. 53–68). Lexington, KY: CreateSpace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, D., & Silen, C. (2011). Empowering tutors. In T. Barrett & S. Moore (Eds.), New approaches to problem-based learning: Revitalising your practice in higher education. Milton Park, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, N. (2008). How may teacher learning be promoted for educational renewal with IT? In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 507–519). New York: Springer Science+Busines Media, LLC. Vol. 20, Part One.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, D., Britnell, J., & Hitchcock, A. (2010). Developing competency models of faculty developers: Using world cafe to foster dialogue. In L. B. Nilson & J. E. Miller (Eds.), To improve the academy: Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development (Vol. 28, pp. 3–24). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donkers, J., Verstegen, D., De Leng, B., & De Jong, N. (2010). E-learning in problem-based learning. In H. van Berkel, A. Scherpbier, H. Hillen, & C. Van der Vleuten (Eds.), Lessons from problem-based learning (pp. 117–128). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N., Mccune, V., & Walker, P. (2001). Conceptions, styles and approaches within higher education: Analytic abstractions and everyday experience. In R. J. Sternberg & L. F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspective on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 103–130). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goh, K. (2013, September 9–11). What good teachers do to promote effective student learning in a problem-based learning environment. Paper presented at the joint 7th Biennial international conference & ERAS conference, Nanyang Girls’ High School, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, M., Rego, P., & O’rourke, P. (2005). Tutoring in problem-based learning medical curricula: The influence of tutor background and style on effectiveness. BMC Medical Education, 5(20). doi:10.1186/1472-6920-5-20.

  • Harden, R. M. (2007). Outcome-based education – The ostrich, the peacock and the beaver. Medical Teacher, 29(7), 666–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendry, G. D. (2009). Problem-based learning tutors’ conceptions of their development as tutors. Medical Teacher, 31(2), 145–150. doi:10.1080/01421590802146026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16, 235–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2006). Goals and strategies of a problem-based learning facilitator. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2008). Facilitating collaborative knowledge building. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 48–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. (2007). Issues in implementing problem-based learning online. In O.-S. Tan (Ed.), Problem-based learning in elearning breakthroughs (pp. 207–226). Singapore, Singapore: Thomson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. (2012). Preface. In D. Jonassen & S. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (Vol. 2, pp. vii–x). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juwah, C., Macfarlan-Dick, D., Matthew, B., Nicol, D., Ross, D., & Smith, B. (2004). Enhancing student learning through effective formative feedback. York: York Science Park/The Higher Education Academy (Generic Centre).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kek, M. Y. C. A., & Hammer, S. (2015). Theorising academic development as an academic discipline? Exploring academic developers’ ways of knowing, theorising and use of methods. In J. Huisman & M. Tight (Eds.), Theory and method in higher education research (Vol. 1, pp. 235–255). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kek, M., & Huijser, H. (2011a). Exploring the combined relationships of student and teacher factors on learning approaches and self-directed learning readiness at a Malaysian university. Studies in Higher Education, 36(2), 185–208. doi:10.1080/03075070903519210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kek, M. Y. C. A., & Huijser, H. (2011b). The power of problem-based learning in developing critical thinking skills: Preparing students for tomorrow’s digital futures in today’s classrooms. Higher Education Research and Development, 30(3), 317–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, G. E., Judd, T. S., Churchward, A., Gray, K., & Krause, K. (2008). First year students’ experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1), 108–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kischner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Kristen, K., Shin, T. S., & Graham, C. R. (2014). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 101–111). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_9.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Land, R. (2004). Educational development: Discourse, identity and practice. Maidenhead, UK: Open University/Society for Research into Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leary, H., Walker, A., Shelton, B., & Fitt, M. H. (2013). Exploring the relationships between tutor background, tutor training, and student learning: A problem-based learning meta-analysis. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 7(1), 44–66. doi:10.771/1541.5015.1331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyberg-Ahlander, V., Lundskog, M., & Hansson, K. (2014). Experiencing the role of PBL tutor. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 28(1–2), 36–46. doi:10.3109/02699206.2013.816371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manathunga, C. (2006). Doing educational development ambivalently: Applying post-colonial metaphors to educational development? International Journal for Academic Development, 11(1), 19–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martyn, J., Terwijn, R., Kek, M. Y. C. A., & Huijser, H. (2014). Exploring the relationships between teaching, approaches to learning and critical thinking in a problem-based learning foundation nursing course. Nurse Education Today, 34(5), 829–835. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2013.04.023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, W. P., & Donnelly, M. B. (1995). The characteristics of the ideal problem-based learning tutor in clinical medical. Evaluation and The Health Professions, 18(2), 124–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcdonald, J. (2014). Community, domain, practice: Facilitator catch cry for revitalising learning and teaching through communities of practice (ALTC Teaching Fellowship Final Report). Sydney: Office of Learning and Teaching, Department of Education, Australia. Retrieved from http://www.olt.gov.au/resource-community-domain-practice.

  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Too cool for schools? No way! Using TPACK framework: You can have your hot tools and teach with them, too. Learning &Leading with Technology, 36(7), 14–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, T., & Kain, D. L. (2011). Student tutors for problem-based learning in dental hygiene: A study of tutor actions. Journal of Dental Education, 75(6), 805–816.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moust, J. (2010). The role of the tutor. In H. van Berkel, A. Scherpbier, H. Hillen, & C. Van der Vleuten (Eds.), Lessons from problem-based learning (pp. 47–56). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pecore, J. L., & Bohan, C. H. (2011). Problem-based learning: Teachers who flourish and flounder. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 14(1–2), 125–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovation (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 9–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savin-Baden, M. (2003). Facilitating problem-based learning: Illuminating perspectives. Maidenhead, UK: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savin-Baden, M., & Major, C. H. (2004). Foundations of problem-based learning. Maidenhead, UK: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In C. Bereiter & B. Smith (Eds.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67–98). Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H. G., & Moust, J. H. C. (1995). What makes a tutor effective? A structural-equations modeling approach to learning in problem-based curricula. Academic Medicine, 70(8), 708–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(4), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (2005, February 6–8). The signature pedagogies of the professions of law, medicine, engineering, and the clergy: Potential lessons for the education of teachers. Paper presented at the Math Science Partnerships (MSP) Workshop: Teacher education for effective teaching and learning, The National Research Council’s Center for Higher Education, Irvine, California, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silen, C. (2006). The tutor’s approach in base group (PBL). Higher Education, 51(3), 373–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silen, C., & Uhlin, L. (2008). Self-directed learning – A learning issues for students and faculty! Teaching in Higher Education, 13(4), 461–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinert, Y., Macdonald, M. E., Boillat, M., Elizov, M., Meterissian, S., Razack, S., et al. (2010). Faculty development: If you build it, they will come. Medical Education, 44(9), 900–907.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans, J. A. (2014). Identifying threshold concepts in the careers of educational developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 19(4), 305–317. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2014.895731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1996). Congruence between intention and strategy in university science teachers’ approaches to teaching. Higher Education, 32, 77–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Ginns, P. (2005). Phenomenographic pedagogy and a revised approaches to teaching inventory. Higher Education Research and Development, 24(4), 349–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, M., Lundeberg, M., & Eberhardt, J. (2011). Strategic facilitation of problem-based discussion for teacher professional development. Journal of Learning Sciences, 20(3), 342–394. doi:10.1080/10508406.2011.553258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kek, M.Y.C.A., Huijser, H. (2017). Agile Staff Professional Learning for Learning. In: Problem-based Learning into the Future. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2454-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2454-2_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2452-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2454-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics