Skip to main content

English Vocabulary Learning Performance and Brainwave Differences: The Comparison Between Gesture-Based and Conventional Word-card

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Educational Technology ((LNET))

Abstract

Electroencephalogram (EEG) has utilized to measure individual physiological states since each individual’s brain is the seat of cognitive activity, connecting body gesture to express ones’ perceptual and mental imagery. This study explores the effects in preschoolers’ brainwave pattern when learning English by comparing the two learning settings, gesture-based system, and conventional word-cards. The study found that: (1) student are not familiar with using gesture to operate the system, more sufficient learning time is required for children to learn new vocabulary in the gesture-based system; (2) the children aged 4-6 need straightforward pictures that are related to their learning content; and (3) the children have smaller head size, so the sizes of brainwave devices should be considered. That is suggested that more attention should be given on deciding the equipment used when collecting and monitoring children’s brainwave. The limitations and future study of this study are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. F.-R. Kuo, C.-C. Hsu, W.-C. Fang, and N.-S. Chen, “The effects of Embodiment-based TPR approach on student English vocabulary learning achievement, retention and acceptance,” J. King Saud Univ. - Compute. Inf. Sci., vol. 26, no. 1, Supplement, pp. 63–70 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Feldman, “Embodied language, best-fit analysis, and formal compositionality,” Phys. Life Rev., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 385–410 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. W. J. Gibbs, Embodiment and Cognitive Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Wilson, “Six views of embodied cognition,” Psychon. Bull. Rev., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 625–636 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. Kellaway, “An orderly approach to visual analysis: characteristics of the normal EEG of adults and children,” Curr. Pract. Clin. Electroencephalogr vol. 2, pp. 139–199, (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Neurosky, “Brain Wave Signal (EEG) of NeuroSky, Inc.” (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Hostetter and M. Alibali, “Visible embodiment: Gestures as Simulated Action,” Psychon. Bull. Rev., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 495–514 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. J. Gibson, The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception by James J. Gibson, 1986 | Online Research Library: Questia. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Wilson and G. Knoblich, “The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics,” Psychol. Bull., vol. 131, no. 3, pp. 460–473, May 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. W. Gibbs Jr. and E. A. Berg, “Mental imagery and embodied activity,” J. Ment. Imag., vol. 26, no. 1–2, pp. 1–30 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. I.-C. Hung, L.-I. Lin, W.-C. Fang, and N.-S. Chen, “Learning with the Body: An Embodiment-Based Learning Strategy Enhances Performance of Comprehending Fundamental Optics,” Interact. Comput. vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 360–371 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. I.-C. Hung, H.-H. Hsu, N.-S. Chen, and Kinshuk, “Communicating through body: a situated embodiment-based strategy with flag semaphore for procedural knowledge construction,” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 749–769 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. K.-J. Chao, H.-W. Huang, W.-C. Fang, and N.-S. Chen, “Embodied play to learn: Exploring Kinect-facilitated memory performance,” Br. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 44, no. 5, pp. E151–E155 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. G. F. Wilson and F. Fisher, “Cognitive task classification based upon topographic EEG data,” Biol. Psychol., vol. 40, no. 1–2, pp. 239–250 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  15. T. A. Pope, H. B. Bogart, and S. D. Bartolome, “Biocybernetic system evaluates indices of operator engagement in automated task,” Biol. Psychol., vol. 40, no. 1–2, pp. 187–195 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  16. F. G. Freeman, P. J. Mikulka, L. J. Prinzel, and M. W. Scerbo, “Evaluation of an adaptive automation system using three EEG indices with a visual tracking task,” Biol. Psychol., vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 61–76 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Shriram, M. Sundhararajan, and N. Daimiwal, “EEG Based Cognitive Workload Assessment for Maximum Efficiency,” Int. Organ. Sci. Res. IOSR, vol. 7, pp. 34–38 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. G. P. Holmes, “An analysis of the information-seeking behavior of science teachers in selected secondary public schools in Florida,” Florida State University (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  19. E. A. Larsen, “Classification of EEG Signals in a Brain-Computer Interface System,” (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Subasi and M. I. Gursoy, “EEG signal classification using PCA, ICA, LDA and support vector machines,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 8659–8666,(2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guan-Ying Wu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wu, GY., Cheng, IL., Chew, S.W., Zhu, CY., Hsu, CN., Chen, NS. (2017). English Vocabulary Learning Performance and Brainwave Differences: The Comparison Between Gesture-Based and Conventional Word-card. In: Popescu, E., et al. Innovations in Smart Learning. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2419-1_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2419-1_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2418-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2419-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics