Abstract
In automated optical design systems, the Jacobian matrix of an optical quantity with respect to the system variables is generally estimated using the Finite Difference (FD) method.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Wynne CG, Wormell P (1963) Lens design by computer. Appl Opt 2:1223–1238
Fede DP (1963) Automatic optical design. Appl Opt 2:1209–1226
Rimmer M (1970) Analysis of perturbed lens systems. Appl Opt 9:533–537
Hopkins HH, Tiziani HJ (1966) A theoretical and experimental study of lens centering errors and their influence on optical image quality. Brit J Appl Phys 17:33–54
Andersen TB (1982) Optical aberration functions: chromatic aberrations and derivatives with respect to refractive indices for symmetrical systems. Appl Opt 21:4040–4044
Gupta SK, Hradaynath R (1983) Angular tolerance on Dove prisms. Appl Opt 22:3146–3147
Lee JF, Leung CY (1989) Method of calculating the alignment tolerance of a Porro prism resonator. Appl Opt 28:3691–3697
Stone BD (1997) Perturbations of optical systems. J Opt Soc Am A 14:2837–2849
Grey DS (1978) The inclusion of tolerance sensitivities in the merit function for lens optimization. SPIE 147:63–65
Herrera EG, Strojnik M (2008) Interferometric tolerance determination for a Dove prism using exact ray trace. Opt Commun 281:897–905
Mao W (1995) Adjustment of reflecting prisms. Opt Eng 1(34):79–82
Chandler KN (1960) On the effect of small errors in angles of corner-cube reflectors. J Opt Soc Am 50:203–206
Lin N (1994) Orientation conjugation of reflecting prism rotation and second-order approximation of image rotation. Opt Eng 33:2400–2407
Gutierrez E, Strojnik M, Paez G (2006) Tolerance determination for a Dove prism using exact ray trace. Proc SPIE 6307:63070K
Virendra NM (1998) Optical imaging and aberrations. SPIE Press, Part I Ray Geometrical Optics
Stone BD (1997) Determination of initial ray configurations for asymmetric systems. J Opt Soc Am A: 14:3415–3429
Andersen TB (1982) Optical aberration functions: derivatives with respect to axial distances for symmetrical systems. Appl Opt 21:1817–1823
Andersen TB (1985) Optical aberration functions: derivatives with respect to surface parameters for symmetrical systems. Appl Opt 24:1122–1129
Feder DP (1957) Calculation of an optical merit function and its derivatives with respect to the system parameters. J Opt Soc Am 47:913–925
Feder DP (1968) Differentiation of raytracing equations with respect to constructional parameters of rotationally symmetric systems. J Opt Soc Am 58:1494–1505
Stavroudis O (1976) A simpler derivation of the formulas for generalized ray tracing. J Opt Soc Am 66:1330–1333
Kross J (1988) Differential ray tracing formulae for optical calculations: principles and applications, SPIE, vol 1013, Optical design method, and large optics, pp 10–18
Oertmann W (1988) Differential ray tracing formulae; applications especially to aspheric optical systems, SPIE, vol 1013, Optical design method, and large optics, pp 20–26
Lin PD, Tsai CY (2012) Determination of first-order derivatives of skew-ray at aspherical surface. J Opt Soc Am A 29:1141–1153
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1
To determine \( {{\partial {\bar{\text{R}}}_{\text{i}} } / {\partial {\bar{\text{R}}}_{{{\text{i}} - 1}} }} \) at a spherical boundary surface \( {\bar{\text{r}}}_{\text{i}} \), the following terms are required in advance:
-
(1)
\( {{\partial\upsigma_{\text{i}} } / {\partial \bar{\text{R}}_{{{\text{i}} - 1}} }} \), \( {{\partial\uprho_{\text{i}} } / {\partial {\bar{\text{R}}}_{{{\text{i}} - 1}} }} \) and \( {{\partial\uptau_{\text{i}} } / {\partial {\bar{\text{R}}}_{{{\text{i}} - 1}} }} \):
From Eq. (2.12), \( {}^{\text{i}}{\bar{\text{P}}}_{\text{i}} = {}^{\text{i}}{\bar{\text{A}}}_{0} \,{\bar{\text{P}}}_{\text{i}} = ({}^{\text{0}}{\bar{\text{A}}}_{\text{i}} )^{ - 1} \,{\bar{\text{P}}}_{\text{i}} = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\upsigma_{\text{i}} } & {\uprho_{\text{i}} } & {\uptau_{\text{i}} } & 1 \\ \end{array} } \right]^{\text{T}} \). Thus,
Differentiating Eq. (7.56) with respect to incoming ray \( {\bar{\text{R}}}_{{{\text{i}} - 1}} \) yields
where \( {{\partial {\bar{\text{P}}}_{\text{i}} } / {\partial {\bar{\text{R}}}_{{{\text{i}} - 1}} }} \) is given in Eq. (7.20). \( {{\partial\upsigma_{\text{i}} } / {\partial {\bar{\text{R}}}_{{{\text{i}} - 1}} }} \), \( {{\partial\uprho_{\text{i}} } / {\partial {\bar{\text{R}}}_{{{\text{i}} - 1}} }} \) and \( {{\partial\uptau_{\text{i}} } / {\partial {\bar{\text{R}}}_{{{\text{i}} - 1}} }} \) can then be determined from
-
(2)
\( {{\partial\upalpha_{\text{i}} } / {\partial {\bar{\text{R}}}_{{{\text{i}} - 1}} }} \) and \( {{\partial\upbeta_{\text{i}} } / {\partial {\bar{\text{R}}}_{{{\text{i}} - 1}} }} \):
\( {{\partial\upalpha_{\text{i}} } / {\partial {\bar{\text{R}}}_{{{\text{i}} - 1}} }} \) and \( {{\partial\upbeta_{\text{i}} } / {\partial {\bar{\text{R}}}_{{{\text{i}} - 1}} }} \) can be obtained by differentiating Eqs. (2.19) and (2.20), respectively, with respect to \( {\bar{\text{R}}}_{{{\text{i}} - 1}} \), that is,
-
(3)
\( {{\partial {\bar{\text{n}}}_{\text{i}} } / {\partial {\bar{\text{X}}}_{\text{i}} }} \):
\( {{\partial {\bar{\text{n}}}_{\text{i}} } / {\partial {\bar{\text{R}}}_{{{\text{i}} - 1}} }} \) can be obtained by differentiating Eq. (2.10) with respect to \( {\bar{\text{R}}}_{{{\text{i}} - 1}} \) to give
where \( {{\partial ({}^{\text{i}}{\bar{\text{n}}}_{\text{i}} )} / {\partial {\bar{\text{R}}}_{{{\text{i}} - 1}} }} \) is obtained by differentiating Eq. (2.8) with respect to \( {\bar{\text{R}}}_{{{\text{i}} - 1}} \), yielding
-
(4)
\( {{\partial ({\text{C}}\uptheta_{\text{i}} )} / {\partial {\bar{\text{R}}}_{{{\text{i}} - 1}} }} \):
\( {{\partial ({\text{C}}\uptheta_{\text{i}} )} / {\partial {\bar{\text{R}}}_{{{\text{i}} - 1}} }} \) can be computed directly from Eq. (2.21) as
where \( {{\partial {\text{n}}_{\text{ix}} } / {\partial {\bar{\text{R}}}_{{{\text{i}} - 1}} }} \), \( {{\partial {\text{n}}_{\text{iy}} } / {\partial {\bar{\text{R}}}_{{{\text{i}} - 1}} }} \) and \( {{\partial {\text{n}}_{\text{iz}} } / {\partial {\bar{\text{R}}}_{{{\text{i}} - 1}} }} \) are given in Eq. (7.61).
Appendix 2
To determine \( {{\partial \bar{\text{R}}_{\text{i}} } / {\partial {\bar{\text{X}}}_{\text{i}} }} \) at spherical boundary surface \( {\bar{\text{r}}}_{\text{ i}} \), the following terms are required in advance
-
(1)
\( {{\partial ({}^{0}{\bar{\text{A}}}_{\text{i}} )} / {\partial {\bar{\text{X}}}_{\text{i}} }} \) (a matrix with dimensions \( 4 \times 4 \times 9 \)):
The components of \( {{\partial ({}^{0}{\bar{\text{A}}}_{\text{i}} )} / {\partial {\bar{\text{X}}}_{\text{i}} }} \) can be determined by differentiating \( {}^{0}{\bar{\text{A}}}_{\text{i}} \) given in Eq. (2.9) with respect to boundary variable vector (Eq. (2.30))
to give
-
(2)
\( {{\partial\upsigma_{\text{i}} } / {\partial {\bar{\text{X}}}_{\text{i}} }} \), \( {{\partial\uprho_{\text{i}} } / {\partial {\bar{\text{X}}}_{\text{i}} }} \) and \( {{\partial\uptau_{\text{i}} } / {\partial {\bar{\text{X}}}_{\text{i}} }} \):
From \( {}^{\text{i}}{\bar{\text{P}}}_{\text{i}} = {}^{\text{i}}{\bar{\text{A}}}_{0} {\bar{\text{P}}}_{\text{i}} = ({}^{\text{0}}{\bar{\text{A}}}_{\text{i}} )^{ - 1} \,{\bar{\text{P}}}_{\text{i}} \) given in Eq. (2.12), it can be shown that
Differentiating Eq. (7.73) with respect to \( {\bar{\text{X}}}_{\text{i}} \) gives
where \( {{\partial {\bar{\text{P}}}_{\text{i}} } / {\partial {\bar{\text{X}}}_{\text{i}} }} \) is given in Eq. (7.43) and the components of \( {{\partial ({}^{0}{\bar{\text{A}}}_{\text{i}} )} / {\partial {\bar{\text{X}}}_{\text{i}} }} \) are listed in Eqs. (7.64)–(7.72) of this appendix. \( {{\partial\upsigma_{\text{i}} } / {\partial {\bar{\text{X}}}_{\text{i}} }} \), \( {{\partial\uprho_{\text{i}} } / {\partial {\bar{\text{X}}}_{\text{i}} }} \) and \( {{\partial {\uptau }_{\text{i}} } / {\partial {\bar{\text{X}}}_{\text{i}} }} \) can then be obtained from
-
(3)
\( {{\partial\upalpha_{\text{i}} } / {\partial {\bar{\text{X}}}_{\text{i}} }} \) and \( {{\partial\upbeta_{\text{i}} } / {\partial {\bar{\text{X}}}_{\text{i}} }} \):
\( {{\partial\upalpha_{\text{i}} } / {\partial {\bar{\text{X}}}_{\text{i}} }} \) and \( {{\partial\upbeta_{\text{i}} } / {\partial {\bar{\text{X}}}_{\text{i}} }} \) can be obtained by differentiating Eqs. (2.19) and (2.20), respectively, with respect to \( {\bar{\text{X}}}_{\text{i}} \) to give
-
(4)
\( {{\partial {\bar{\text{n}}}_{\text{i}} } / {\partial {\bar{\text{X}}}_{\text{i}} }} \):
\( {{\partial {\bar{\text{n}}}_{\text{i}} } / {\partial {\bar{\text{X}}}_{\text{i}} }} \) can be obtained by differentiating Eq. (2.10) with respect to \( {\bar{\text{X}}}_{\text{i}} \) to give
where \( {{\partial ({}^{\text{i}}{\bar{\text{n}}}_{\text{i}} )} / {\partial {\bar{\text{X}}}_{\text{i}} }} \) is obtained by differentiating Eq. (2.8) to give
-
(5)
\( {{\partial ({\text{C}}\uptheta_{\text{i}} )} / {\partial {\bar{\text{X}}}_{\text{i}} }} \)
\( {{\partial ({\text{C}}\uptheta_{\text{i}} )} / {\partial {\bar{\text{X}}}_{\text{i}} }} \) can be computed directly from Eq. (2.21) as
where \( {{\partial {\text{n}}_{\text{ix}} } / {\partial {\bar{\text{X}}}_{\text{i}} }} \), \( {{\partial {\text{n}}_{\text{iy}} } / {\partial {\bar{\text{X}}}_{\text{i}} }} \) and \( {{{\partial}{\text{n}}_{\text{iz}} } / {{\partial}{\bar{\text{X}}}_{\text{i}} }} \) are given in Eq. (7.78).
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lin, P.D. (2017). Jacobian Matrices of Ray R̄i with Respect to Incoming Ray R̄i–1 and Boundary Variable Vector X̄i . In: Advanced Geometrical Optics. Progress in Optical Science and Photonics, vol 4. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2299-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2299-9_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2298-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2299-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)