Abstract
This chapter focuses on the effectiveness of travel plans at a set of case study sites. The aim of the chapter is to evaluate the effectiveness of travel plans for new residential developments, while considering the potential for self-selection bias effects.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arlington County Commuter Services. (2013). Residential building transportation performance monitoring study. Virginia, US: Arlington.
Arrington, G., & Cervero, R. (2008). TCRaP report 128: Effects of TOD on housing, parking and travel. Washington, D.C., US: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2011). Census of population and housing data. Retrieved September 25, 2014 from http://www.abs.gov.au/census.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2011b). Reflecting a nation: Stories from the 2011 Census. Australia: Canberra.
Australian Government. (2006). Census and statistics act 1905. Australia: Canberra.
BioRegional. (2009). BedZED seven years on: The impact of the UK’s best known eco-village and its residents. UK.
Cairns, S., Sloman, L., Newson, C., Anable, J., Kirkbride, A., & Goodwin, P. (2004). Smarter choices—changing the way we travel. UK: Department for Transport.
Caliendo, M., & Kopeinig, S. (2008). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(1), 31–72.
Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P., & Handy, S. (2009). Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behaviour: A focus on empirical findings. Transport Reviews, 29(3), 359–395.
Cao, X., Xu, Z., & Fan, Y. (2010). Exploring the connections among residential location, self-selection, and driving: Propensity score matching with multiple treatments. Transportation Research Part A, 44(10), 797–805.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, New Jersey, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Department for Transport. (2005). Making residential travel plans work: Guidelines for new development. London, UK.
Department of Transport, Planning and Local Infrastructure. (2010). Victorian integrated survey of travel and activity data. Retrieved September 25, 2014, from http://www.dtpli.vic.gov.au/.
De Gruyter, C., Rose, G., & Currie, G. (In Press). ‘Travel Plans for New Residential Developments: Measuring Self-Selection Effects to Better Understand Travel Behaviour Impacts’. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2564.
De Gruyter, C., Rose, G., & Currie, G. (2015). ‘Understanding Travel Plan Effectiveness for New Residential Developments’. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2537, 126–136.
Enoch, M. (2012). Sustainable transport, mobility management and travel plans. Surrey, England: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Heinrich, C., Maffioli, A., & Vazquez, G. (2010). A primer for applying propensity-score matching: Impact-evaluation guidelines, Technical Notes No. IDB-TN-161, Inter-American Development Bank.
Institute of Transportation Engineers. (2008). Trip generation (8th ed.). US: Washington D.C.
Kahneham, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.
Lee, J. S., Zegras, C., Ben-Joseph, E., & Park, S. (2014). Does urban living influence baby boomer’ travel behaviour? Journal of Transport Geography, 35, 21–29.
Melia, S. (2009). Potential for carfree development in the UK. PhD thesis, University of West England.
Melia, S., Barton, H., & Parkhurst, G. (2013). Potential for carfree development in the UK. Urban Design and Planning, 166(DP2), 136–145.
Mokhtarian, P., & Cao, X. (2008). Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behaviour: A focus on methodologies. Transportation Research Part B, 42, 204–228.
Naess, P. (2009). Residential self-selection and appropriate control variables in land use: Travel studies. Transport Reviews, 29(3), 293–324.
Roads & Maritime Services. (2013). Guide to traffic generating developments: Updated traffic surveys. Australia: New South Wales Government.
Roads and Traffic Authority. (2002). Guide to traffic generating developments. Australia: New South Wales.
Rye, T. (2002). Travel plans: Do they work? Transport Policy, 9, 287–298.
WSP. (2014). Does car ownership increase car use? A study of the use of car parking within residential developments in London, Commissioned by the Berkeley Group, UK.
Howlett, R., & Watson, T. (2010). Travel planning in Victoria—a new strategic approach to sustaining communities. in Paper Presented to 33rd Australasian Transport Research Forum (ATRF), Canberra, Australia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
De Gruyter, C. (2017). Travel Plan Impacts. In: Travel Plans for New Residential Developments: Insights from Theory and Practice. Springer Theses. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2092-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2092-6_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2091-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2092-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)