Travel Plan Impacts
- 251 Downloads
This chapter focuses on the effectiveness of travel plans at a set of case study sites. The aim of the chapter is to evaluate the effectiveness of travel plans for new residential developments, while considering the potential for self-selection bias effects.
KeywordsControl Site Propensity Score Match Travel Behaviour Residential Development Travel Survey
- Arlington County Commuter Services. (2013). Residential building transportation performance monitoring study. Virginia, US: Arlington.Google Scholar
- Arrington, G., & Cervero, R. (2008). TCRaP report 128: Effects of TOD on housing, parking and travel. Washington, D.C., US: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.Google Scholar
- Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2011). Census of population and housing data. Retrieved September 25, 2014 from http://www.abs.gov.au/census.
- Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2011b). Reflecting a nation: Stories from the 2011 Census. Australia: Canberra.Google Scholar
- Australian Government. (2006). Census and statistics act 1905. Australia: Canberra.Google Scholar
- BioRegional. (2009). BedZED seven years on: The impact of the UK’s best known eco-village and its residents. UK.Google Scholar
- Cairns, S., Sloman, L., Newson, C., Anable, J., Kirkbride, A., & Goodwin, P. (2004). Smarter choices—changing the way we travel. UK: Department for Transport.Google Scholar
- Cao, X., Xu, Z., & Fan, Y. (2010). Exploring the connections among residential location, self-selection, and driving: Propensity score matching with multiple treatments. Transportation Research Part A, 44(10), 797–805.Google Scholar
- Department for Transport. (2005). Making residential travel plans work: Guidelines for new development. London, UK.Google Scholar
- Department of Transport, Planning and Local Infrastructure. (2010). Victorian integrated survey of travel and activity data. Retrieved September 25, 2014, from http://www.dtpli.vic.gov.au/.
- De Gruyter, C., Rose, G., & Currie, G. (In Press). ‘Travel Plans for New Residential Developments: Measuring Self-Selection Effects to Better Understand Travel Behaviour Impacts’. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2564.Google Scholar
- De Gruyter, C., Rose, G., & Currie, G. (2015). ‘Understanding Travel Plan Effectiveness for New Residential Developments’. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2537, 126–136.Google Scholar
- Enoch, M. (2012). Sustainable transport, mobility management and travel plans. Surrey, England: Ashgate Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
- Heinrich, C., Maffioli, A., & Vazquez, G. (2010). A primer for applying propensity-score matching: Impact-evaluation guidelines, Technical Notes No. IDB-TN-161, Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
- Institute of Transportation Engineers. (2008). Trip generation (8th ed.). US: Washington D.C.Google Scholar
- Melia, S. (2009). Potential for carfree development in the UK. PhD thesis, University of West England.Google Scholar
- Roads & Maritime Services. (2013). Guide to traffic generating developments: Updated traffic surveys. Australia: New South Wales Government.Google Scholar
- Roads and Traffic Authority. (2002). Guide to traffic generating developments. Australia: New South Wales.Google Scholar
- WSP. (2014). Does car ownership increase car use? A study of the use of car parking within residential developments in London, Commissioned by the Berkeley Group, UK.Google Scholar
- Howlett, R., & Watson, T. (2010). Travel planning in Victoria—a new strategic approach to sustaining communities. in Paper Presented to 33rd Australasian Transport Research Forum (ATRF), Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar