Theoretical Foundations

  • Chris De GruyterEmail author
Part of the Springer Theses book series (Springer Theses)


The aim of this chapter is to describe the theoretical foundations for this research by providing a literature review of both implementation theory and planning enforcement theory. These theories strongly align with the research aim of identifying opportunities to enhance the implementation and subsequent effectiveness of travel plans for new residential developments.


Effective Implementation Residential Development Travel Plan Systematic Enforcement Implementation Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Askew, M. (2011). When travel matters: Opportunities, barriers and policy options for workplace travel management in Sydney. Ph.D. thesis, Macquarie University, Sydney.Google Scholar
  2. Burby, R., May, P., & Paterson, R. (1998). Improving compliance with regulations: Choices and outcomes for local government. Journal of the American Planning Association, 64(3), 324–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Elmore, R. (1978). Organizational models of social program implementation. Public Policy, 26(2), 185–228.Google Scholar
  4. Elmore, R. (1979). Backward mapping: Implementation research and policy decisions. Political Science Quarterly, 94(4), 601–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gunn, L. A. (1978). Why is implementation so difficult? Management Services in Government, 33, 169–176.Google Scholar
  6. Harris, N. (2010). Discretion and expediency in the enforcement of planning controls. Town Planning Review, 81(6), 675–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Harris, N. (2011). Discipline, surveillance, control: A foucaultian perspective on the enforcement of planning regulations. Planning Theory & Practice, 12(1), 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ison, S., & Rye, T. (2003). Lessons from travel planning and road user charging for policy-making: through imperfection to implementation. Transport Policy, 10, 223–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lai, L., Yung, P., Li, R., & Ho, D. (2007). The private supply of and public demand for planning: Compliance with planning conditions in the absence of direct statutory enforcement measures. Planning Practice and Research, 22(4), 535–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lipsky, M. (1971). Street-level bureaucracy and the analysis of urban reform. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 6, 391–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Marzotto, T., Burnor, V., & Bonham, G. (2000). The evolution of public policy: Cars and the environment. Colorado, US: Lynne Rienner Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
  12. Mazmanian, D., & Sabatier, P. (1981). Effective policy implementation. Lexington Books, D.C. Heath and Company, US.Google Scholar
  13. McKay, S. (2003). Sheriffs and outlaws: In pursuit of effective enforcement. Town Planning Review, 74(4), 423–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. O’Toole, L. (1986). Policy recommendations for multi-actor implementation: An assessment of the field. Journal of Public Policy, 6(2), 181–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. O’Toole, L. (2007). Interorganizational relations in implementation. In B. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), Handbook of public administration (pp. 142–152). London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  16. Paudel, N. R. (2009). A critical account of policy implementation theories: Status and reconsideration. Nepalese Journal of Public Policy and Governance, 25(2), 36–54.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. Planning Enforcement Officers Association Inc. (2007). A guide to planning enforcement in Victoria, PEOA, Victoria, Australia, viewed 25 September 2014.
  18. Prior, A. (2000). Problems in the theory and practice of planning enforcement. Planning Theory & Practice, 1(1), 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pülzl, H., & Treib, O. (2007). Implementing public policy. In F. Fischer, G. Miller & M. Sidney (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics and methods. US: Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  20. Sabatier, P. (1986). Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: A critical analysis and suggested synthesis. Journal of Public Policy, 6(1), 21–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sabatier, P. (1998). The advocacy coalition framework: Revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(1), 98–130.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sabatier, P., & Mazmanian, D. (1980). The implementation of public policy: A framework of analysis. Policy Studies Journal, 8(4), 538–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sabatier, P., & Mazmanian, D. (1981) The implementation of public policy: A framework of analysis. In: D, Mazmanian, & P. Sabatier (Eds.), Effective policy implementation. US: D.C. Heath and Company.Google Scholar
  24. Victorian Auditor-General. (2008). Enforcement of planning permits. Australia: Victoria.Google Scholar
  25. Winter, S. (2007). Implementation perspectives: Status and reconsideration. In B. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), Handbook of public administration (pp. 131–141). London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil Engineering, Institute of Transport StudiesMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia

Personalised recommendations