Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Data Fusion Strategy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Data-Driven Technology for Engineering Systems Health Management

  • 1941 Accesses

Abstract

With industry system becoming more and more complex, maintenance personnel tend to utilize the multi-type sensors to collect signals from the machine being monitored. By comparing these acquired signals with healthy signals (benchmarking signals), the maintenance personnel are able to assess the running condition of the monitored machines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Basir O, Yuan XH (2007) Engine fault diagnosis based on multi-sensor information fusion using Dempster-Shafer evidence theory. Inf Fusion 8(4):379–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock JR, Brotherton T, Grabill P, Gass D, Keller JA (2006) On false alarm mitigation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE aerospace conference, Big Sky, MT, March 4–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutros T, Ling M (2007) Mechanical fault detection using fuzzy index fusion. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47:1702–1714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byington CS, Watson M, Kalgren P, Safa-Bakhsh R (2003) Metrics evaluation and tool development for health and usage monitoring system technology. In: AHS Forum 59, Phoenix, Arizona

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantinidis AS, Fairhurst MC, Rahman AFR (2000) Detection of circumscribed masses in digital mammograms using behaviour-knowledge space method. IEE Electron Lett 36(4):302–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dempster AP (1967) Upper and lower probabilities induced by multivalued mappings. Ann Math Stat 38:325–339

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Denoeux T (2000) A neural network classifier based on Dempster-Shafer theory. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet A: Syst Hum 30(2):131–150

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ginart A, Barlas I, Goldin J, Dorrity JL (2006) Automated feature selection for embeddable prognostic and health monitoring (PHM) architectures. In: IEEE System Readiness Technology Conference, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Goebel K, Yan WZ, Cheetham W (2002) A method to calculate classifier correlation for decision fusion. In: Proceedings of decision and control, pp 135–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall DL, Llinas J (1997) An introduction to multisensor data fusion. IEEE Digit Object Identif 85(1):6–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Hang YS, Suen CY (1993) The behavior-knowledge space method for combination of multiple classifiers. In: IEEE, pp 347–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang R, Xi L, Li X, Liu CR, Qiu H, Lee J (2007) Residual life predictions for bass bearings based on self-organizing map and back propagation neural network methods. Mech Syst Signal Process 21:193–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jounela SJ, Vermasvuorim M, Enden P, Haavisto S (2003) A process monitoring systems based on the Kohonen self-organizing maps. Control Eng Pract 18(1):78–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang P, Birtwhistle D (2003) Condition assessment of power tansformer on load tap changers using wavelet analysis and self-organizing map: field evaluation, IEEE Trans on Power Deliver 18:78–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohonen T (2001) Self-organizing maps, 3rd edn. Springer, ISBN 3-540-67921-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Kou JB, Zhang CS (2003) Multi-agent based classifier combination. Chin J Comput 1–5 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuncheva L (2002) A theoretical study on six classifier fusion strategies. IEEE Trans Syst 24(2):281–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuncheva LI, Bezdek JC, Duin RPW (2001) Decision templates for multiple classifier fusion: an experimental comparison. Pattern Recogn 34:299–314

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kuncheva LI, Whitaker CJ, Shipp CA (2003) Limits on the majority vote accuracy in classifier fusion. Pattern Anal Appl 6:22–31

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lee J, Ni J, Djurdjanovic D, Qiu H, Liao H (2006) Intelligent prognostic tools and e-maintenance. Comput Ind 57:476–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehtonen M (2006) On the optimal strategies of condition monitoring and maintenance allocation in distribution systems. In: 9th International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems, June 11–15, 2006, Stockholm, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlestone N, Warmuth M (1989) Weighted majority algorithm. In: IEEE symposium on foundations of computer science, pp 256–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Niu G, Yang BD (2009) Dempster-Shafer regression for multi-step-ahead time-series prediction towards data-driven machinery prognosis. Mech Syst Signal Process 23:740–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niu G, Yang BS (2010) Intelligent condition monitoring and prognostics system based on data-fusion strategy. Expert Sys with Appl 37:8831–8840

    Google Scholar 

  • Niu G, Yang BS, Pecht M (2010) Development of an optimized condition-based maintenance system by data fusion and reliability-centered maintenance. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 95:786–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niu G, Han T, Yang BS, Tan ACC (2007a) Multi-agent decision fusion for motor fault diagnosis. Mech Syst Signal Process 21(3):1285–1299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niu G, Son JD, Achmad W, Yang BS (2007b) A comparison of classifier performance for fault diagnosis of induction motor using multi-types signals. Struct Health Monit 6(3):0215-15

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogata K (2009) Modern control engineering, 5th edn. Prentice Hall. ISBN: 9780137133376

    Google Scholar 

  • Partridge D, Krzanowski W (1997) Software diversity: practical statistics for its measurement arid exploitation. Inf Softw Technol 39(10):707–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrakos M, Benediktsson JA (2001) The effect of classifier agreement on the accuracy of the combined classifier in decision level fusion. Trans Geosci Remote Sens 39(11):2546–2569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu H, Lee J, Lin J, Yu G (2003) Robust performance degradation assessment methods for enhanced rolling element bearing prognostics. Adv Eng Inform 17:127–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruta D, Gabrys B (2000) An overview of classifier fusion methods. IEEE Comput Inf Syst 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer T, Yorke JA, Casdagli M (1991) Embedology. J Stat Phys 65:579–616

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shafer G (1976) A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Smets P, Kennes R (1994) The transferable belief model. Artif Intell 66:191–243

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sorjamaa A, Hao J, Reyhani N, Ji Y, Lendasse A (2007) Methodology for long-term prediction of time series. Neurocomputing

    Google Scholar 

  • Takens F (1981) Detecting strange attractors in turbulence. In: Rand DA, Young LS (eds) Dynamical systems and turbulence. Springer, New York, pp 366–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Taniguchi M, Tresp V (1997) Averaging regularized estimators. Neural Computation 9(5):1163–1178

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma B, Gader P, Chen W (2001) Fusion of multiple handwritten word recognition techniques. Pattern Recogn Lett 22:991–998

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu L, Krzyzak A, Suen C (1992) Methods of combining multiple classifiers and their applications to handwriting recognition. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet 22(3):418–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR (2001) Dempster-Shafer belief structures with interval valued focal weights. Int J Intell Syst 16:497–512

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yang BS, Kim KJ (2006) Application of Dempster-Shafer theory in fault diagnosis of induction motors using vibration and current signals. Mech Syst Signal Process 20(2):403–420

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Rail Transit, Tongji University, Shanghai, China

    Gang Niu

Authors
  1. Gang Niu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore and Science Press, Beijing, China

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Niu, G. (2017). Data Fusion Strategy. In: Data-Driven Technology for Engineering Systems Health Management. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2032-2_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2032-2_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2031-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2032-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation