Skip to main content

How Can We Know What We “Know” About Law and Development? The Importance of Taiwan in Comparative Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Legal Thoughts between the East and the West in the Multilevel Legal Order

Part of the book series: Economics, Law, and Institutions in Asia Pacific ((ELIAP))

  • 836 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter will argue for the importance of Taiwan as a case study for research on relationships between law and economic and political development. The pioneering work of Professor Ma and others about law in Taiwan should be developed and expanded so that scholars around the world can incorporate Taiwan’s experience into more general theorizing about legal systems and economic and political change. Taiwan’s legal system has been relevant to both Taiwan’s outstanding record of economic development and to its successful transition to democracy, yet the role of law and legal institutions in these two markers of Taiwan’s development has been understudied in the global law and development literature. This is a serious shortcoming for the scholarly field, however, as Taiwan’s successes have been too conspicuous, and are too well established, to be ignored. This chapter will seek to address that shortcoming by surveying various claims or assumptions in the field of law and development and examining them in light of Taiwan’s experience. Much of the focus will be on areas of law that are directly related to economic development, but the chapter will also examine the role of law and legal institutions in Taiwan’s democratization. The conclusions that this chapter draws should be helpful not only to scholars but also to governments or international institutions engaging in legal reform projects in developing countries of today.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Cassel (2012), p. 175; Xu (2008), p. 2.

  2. 2.

    Trubek and Santos (2006), pp. 3–5.

  3. 3.

    See generally North (1990).

  4. 4.

    See generally De Soto (1989, 2000).

  5. 5.

    See generally Posner (1998).

  6. 6.

    See generally Winn (1994); Upham (1994).

  7. 7.

    See generally La Porta et al. (1998).

  8. 8.

    See generally Ohnesorge (2003a); Ohnesorge (2009).

  9. 9.

    Ohnesorge (2009), pp. 1625–1626.

  10. 10.

    Winn (1994), p. 194.

  11. 11.

    Upham (1994), p. 235.

  12. 12.

    The most explicit use of this academic literature in law and development practice is by the World Bank’s Doing Business project, which clearly incorporates the concerns of this literature into its “Protecting Investors” index. See Protecting Minority Investors,http://www.doingbusiness.org/data/exploretopics/protecting-minority-investors. Accessed 28 February 2016.

  13. 13.

    Champion (1998), pp. 122–135.

  14. 14.

    See generally Milhaupt (2004); Ohnesorge (2007a, b, c, d), pp. 109–110.

  15. 15.

    See generally Ginsburg (2001); Ginsburg (2002); Ohnesorge (2003b, 2006, 2007b, 2011); (2016a).

  16. 16.

    The East Asian developmental state literature is truly voluminous. Works focused on Taiwan that at least engage state-centric perspectives include Amsden (1979, 1985); Galenson (1979); Winkler and Greenhalgh (1988); Wade (1990); Simon and Kau (1992); Aberbach et al. (1994); Hsueh et al. (2001); Amsden and Chu (2003); Wu (2005); Greene (2008).

  17. 17.

    See generally Ginsburg (2001); Ginsburg (2002); Ohnesorge (2003b, 2006, 2007b, 2011, 2016a).

  18. 18.

    Ohnesorge (2008), p. 315.

  19. 19.

    Ohnesorge (2003b), p. 97.

  20. 20.

    See generally North et al. (2009).

  21. 21.

    See generally North et al. (2013).

  22. 22.

    See generally You (2013).

  23. 23.

    North et al. (2013), p. ix.

References

  • Aberbach JD, Dollar D, Sokoloff KL (eds) (1994) The role of the state in Taiwan’s development. M.E. Sharpe, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Amsden AH (1979) Taiwan’s economic history: a case of etatisme and a challenge to dependency theory. Mod Chin 5:341–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amsden AH (1985) The state and Taiwan’s economic development. In: Evans PB Rueschemeyer D, Skocpol T (eds) Bringing the state back in. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 78–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Amsden AH, Chu WW (2003) Beyond late development. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassel PK (2012) Grounds of judgment. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Champion SR (1998) The great Taiwan bubble. Pacific View Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • De Soto H (1989) The other path. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • De Soto H, (2000) The mystery of capital. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Galenson W (1979) Economic growth and structural change in Taiwan. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg T (2001) Dismantling the “developmental state”? Administrative procedure reform in Japan and Korea. Am J Comp L 49:585–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg T (2002) Comparative administrative procedure: evidence from Northeast Asia. Constit Polit Econ 13:247–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene JM (2008) The origins of the developmental state in Taiwan. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsueh L-M, Hsu C-K, Perkins DH (eds) (2001) Industrialization and the state: the changing role of the Taiwan government in the economy, 1945–1998. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1998) Law and finance. J Polit Econ 106(6):1113–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milhaupt CJ (2004) Nonprofit organizations as investor protection: economic theory, and evidence from East Asia. Yale J Int L 29:169–207

    Google Scholar 

  • North DC (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • North DC, Wallis JJ, Weingast BR (2009) Violence and social orders. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • North DC, Wallis JJ, Webb SB, Weingast BR (eds) (2013) In the shadow of violence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohnesorge JKM (2003a) China’s economic transition and the new legal origins literature. China Econ Rev 14:485–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohnesorge JKM (2003b) The rule of law, economic development, and the developmental states of Northeast Asia. In: Antons C (ed) Law and development in East and Southeast Asia. RoutledgeCurzon, New York, pp 91–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohnesorge JKM (2006) Chinese administrative law in the northeast Asian mirror. Transnational L & Contemp Probl 16:103–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohnesorge JKM (2007a) The rule of law. In: Hagen J (ed) 3 Annual review of law and social science 3. Annual Reviews, Palo Alto, pp 99–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohnesorge JKM (2007b) Asia’s legal systems in the wake of the financial crisis: can the rule of law carry any of the weight? In: Woo MJ-E (ed) Neoliberalism and institutional reform in east Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire, pp 63–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohnesorge JKM (2007c) Developing development theory: law & development theory and the northeast Asian experience. Univ Pa J Int Econ L 28:219–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohnesorge JKM (2007d) Politics, ideology, and legal system reform in northeast Asia. In: Antons C, Gessner V (eds) Globalisation and resistance: law reform in Asia since the crisis. Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp 105–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohnesorge JKM (2008) Northeast Asian development and the problem of rights. In: Groppi T, Piergigli V, Rinella A (eds) Asian constitutionalism in transition. Giuffre Editore, Millano, pp 305–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohnesorge JKM (2009) Legal origins and the tasks of corporate law in economic development. Brigham Young University Law Review 2009(06):1619–1634

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohnesorge JKM (2011) Administrative law in East Asia: a comparative-historical analysis. In: Lindseth PL, Rose-Ackerman S (eds) Comparative administrative law. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 78–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohnesorge JKM (2016a) The regulatory state in East Asia. In: Bignami F, Zaring D (eds) Comparative law and regulation: understanding the global regulatory process. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohnesorge JKM (2016b) East Asia and the study of law and development. In: Antons C (ed) Routledge handbook of Asian law. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner RA (1998) Creating a legal framework for economic development. World Bank Res Obs 13(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon DF, Kau MYM (eds) (1992) Taiwan: beyond the economic miracle. M.E. Sharpe, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Trubek DM, Santos A (2006) Introduction: the third moment in law and development theory and the emergence of a new critical practice. In: Trubek DM, Santos A (eds) The new law and economic development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Upham FK (1994) Comment – speculations on legal informality: on Winn’s “relational practices and the marginalization of law”. L & Soc Rev 28(2):233–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade R (1990) Governing the market. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Winckler EA, Greenhalgh S (eds) (1988) Contending approaches to the political economy of Taiwan. M.E. Sharpe, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Winn JK (1994) Relational practices and the marginalization of law: informal financial practices of small businesses in Taiwan. L & Soc Rev 28:193–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y (2005) A political explanation of economic growth. Harvard University Asia Center, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu X (2008) Trial of modernity: judicial reform in early twentieth-century china – 1901–1937. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • You J-s (2013) Transition from a limited access order to an open access order: the case of south Korea. In: North DC, Wallis JJ, Webb SB, Weingast BR (eds) In the shadow of violence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 293–327

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Bethany Wilson, Class of 2017, University of Wisconsin Law School, for her excellent research assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Ohnesorge .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ohnesorge, J. (2016). How Can We Know What We “Know” About Law and Development? The Importance of Taiwan in Comparative Perspective. In: Lo, Cf., Li, N., Lin, Ty. (eds) Legal Thoughts between the East and the West in the Multilevel Legal Order. Economics, Law, and Institutions in Asia Pacific. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1995-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1995-1_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-1994-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-1995-1

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics