Abstract
Reflection is the mental process that occurs when we encounter situations that cannot be effectively dealt with using previous experiences and solutions. For decades, it has been acknowledged as an important process in learning, and in recent years it has become a central focus of branches of interaction design. Games are highly appropriate vehicles for triggering and supporting reflection, but several of the dominant tropes of conventional game design directly work against reflection. In serious games, the promise of safe environments, the drive to pose problems with clear solutions and a preference for stealth learning complicate how directly we can design for reflection. In mainstream entertainment games, qualities such as immersion and the design traditions of designing for the everyplayer and quantifying motivation again run counter to a reflective agenda. Drawing on the critical and reflective design literature and on case studies of experimental games on the peripheries of mainstream game design, I propose reflective game design, a new alternative design agenda from which to design, deconstruct and make sense of play experiences.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Abbott, M. (2012). Video games are easier than ever, yet harder to manage. https://kotaku.com/5887020/video-games-are-easier-than-ever-yet-harder-to-manage.
Abt, C. C. (1970). Serious games. Viking Press.
Agre, P. (1997). Computation and human experience. Learning in doing. Cambridge University Press.
Andersen, E. (2012). Optimizing adaptivity in educational games. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (pp. 279–281). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2282338.2282398.
Annetta, L. A. (2008). Video games in education: Why they should be used and how they are being used. Theory Into Practice: New Media and Education in the 21st Century, 47(3), 229–239.
Barr, P. (2013). Art Game. http://www.pippinbarr.com/games/artgame/ArtGame.html.
Bateman, C., & Boon, R. (2006). 21st Century game design. Charles river media game development series. Charles River Media.
Boal, A. (1985). Theatre of the oppressed. Theatre Communications Group.
Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. Kogan Page.
Burke, K. (1950). A Rhetoric of motives. Prentice-Hall.
Calleja, G. (2011). In-game: From immersion to incorporation. MIT Press.
Chen, N. S., Wei, C. W., Wu, K. T., & Uden, L. (2009). Effects of high level prompts and peer assessment on online learners’ reflection levels. Computer Education, 52(2), 283–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.007.
Cook, J., & Oliver, M. (2002). Designing a toolkit to support dialogue in learning. Computer Education, 38(1–3), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(01)00076-8.
Crookall, D. (2010). Serious games, debriefing, and simulation/gaming as a discipline. Simulation Gaming, 41(6), 898–920. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878110390784.
Davidson (1983). Math Blaster!.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Heath and company: D.C.
Die Gute Fabrik (2014). Johann Sebastian Joust. http://www.jsjoust.com/.
Dourish, P., Finlay, J., Sengers, P., & Wright, P. (2004). Reflective HCI: Towards a critical technical practice. In: CHI ’04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA ’04, pp. 1727–1728. ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/985921.986203.
Dunne, A. (2006). Hertzian tales: Electronic products, aesthetic experience, and critical design. The MIT Press.
Ermi, L., & Mäyrä, F. (2005). Fundamental components of the gameplay experience: Analysing immersion. In DIGRA. DIGRA.
Ernevi, A., Palm, S., & Redström, J. (2007). Erratic appliances and energy awareness. Knowledge, Technology, and Policy, 20(1), 71–78.
European design centre: Birth play (2011–2013).
Fisch, S., Kirkorian, H., & Anderson, D. (2005). Transfer of learning in informal education: The case of television. In J. P. Mestre (ed.) Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective, pp. 371–393. Information Age Publishing.
Frasca, G. (2004). Videogames of the oppressed: Critical thinking, education, tolerance, and other trivial issues. (pp. 85–94). MIT Press, Boston. http://www.electronicbookreview.com/thread/firstperson/Boalian.
Friedman, B., Kahn Jr., P. H. (2003). The human-computer interaction handbook. chap. Human values, ethics, and design, (pp. 1177–1201). L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale, NJ, USA.
Fullerton, T. (2008). Game design workshop, Second Edition: A playcentric approach to creating innovative games (Gama Network Series), 2 edn. Morgan Kaufmann.
Gaver, B., Dunne, T., & Pacenti, E. (1999). Design: Cultural probes. Interactions, 6, 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/291224.291235.
Gaver, W. (2008). Designing for homo ludens, still. In Binder, T., Lowgren, J., Malmborg, L. (eds.) (Re)Searching the Digital Bauhaus. Springer.
Gaver, W., Sengers, P., Kerridge, T., Kaye, J., & Bowers, J. (2007). Enhancing ubiquitous computing with user interpretation: Field testing the home health horoscope. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’07, (pp. 537–546). ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240711.
Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Palgrave Macmillan.
Geurts, J., de Caluwé, L., & Stoppelenburg, A. (2000). Changing Organisations with gaming/simulations. Elsevier Bedrijfsinformatie.
Hall, L., Jones, S., Paiva, A., Aylett, R. (2009). Fearnot!: providing children with strategies to cope with bullying. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, IDC ’09, (pp. 276–277). ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/1551788.1551854.
Hayes, N. A., & Broadbent, D. E. (1988). Two modes of learning for interactive tasks. Cognition, 28(3), 249–276.
Hijmans, E., Peters, V., van de Westelaken, M., Heldens, J., van Gils, A. (2009). Encounters of a safe environment in simulation games. In Bagdonas, E., Patasiene, I. (eds.) Games: Virtual Worlds and Reality. Selected papers of ISAGA 2009.
Hofstede, G. J., De Caluwé, L., & Peters, V. (2010). Why simulation games work-in search of the active substance: A synthesis. Simulation Gaming, 41(6), 824–843. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878110375596.
Khaled, R. (2012). Muse-based game design. In Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, (pp. 721–730). ACM.
Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.
Levine, K. (2007). BioShock. 2K Games.
Mandler, J. (2004). The foundations of mind: Origins of conceptual thought. USA: Oxford Series in Cognitive Development. Oxford University Press.
Mawdesley, M., Long, G., Al-jibouri, S., & Scott, D. (2011). The enhancement of simulation based learning exercises through formalised reflection, focus groups and group presentation. Computers & Education, 56(1), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.005.
McNamara, D. S., O’Reilly, T. P., Best, R. M., & Ozuru, Y. (2006). Improving adolescent students’ reading comprehension with istart. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(2), 147–171.
Mezirow, J. (1990). Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: a guide to transformative and emancipatory learning. Jossey-Bass Social and Behavioral Science Series: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Molyneux, P. (2004). Fable. Microsoft Game Studios.
Moon, J. (1999). Reflection in learning and professional development: Theory and practice. Taylor & Francis.
Muller, M. J. (2003). The human-computer interaction handbook. chap. Participatory design: the third space in HCI, (pp. 1051–1068). L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale, NJ, USA.
Murray, J. H. (1997). Hamlet on the Holodeck: The future of narrative in cyberspace. New York, NY, USA: The Free Press.
Pajitnov, A. (1984). Tetris. Infogrames.
Piaget, J. (1985). The equilibration of cognitive structures. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Pilkington, R., & Parker-Jones, C. (1996). Interacting with computer-based simulation: The role of dialogue. Computers & Education, 27(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1315(96)00013-9.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital game-based learning. McGraw-Hill.
Rawitsch, D., Heinemann, B., Dillenberger, P. (1974). The Oregon trail. Minnesota Educational Computing Consortium.
Raybourn, E. M. (2000). Designing an emergent culture of negotiation in collaborative virtual communities: The case of the domecitymoo. SIGGROUP Bulletin, 21(1), 28–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/377272.377293.
Salen, K., Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of Play: Game design fundamentals. MIT Press.
Schell, J. (2008). The art of game design: A book of lenses, 1 edn. Morgan Kaufmann.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
Sengers, P., Boehner, K., David, S., & Kaye, J. J. (2005). Reflective design. In: Proceedings of the 4th decennial conference on Critical computing: between sense and sensibility, CC ’05, (pp. 49–58). ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/1094562.1094569.
Sicart, M. (2009). The banality of simulated evil: Designing ethical gameplay. Ethics and Information Technology, 11(3), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-009-9199-5.
Solomon, J. (1987). New thoughts on teacher education. Oxford Review of Education, 13(3), 267–274.
Sotamaa, O. (2007). Perceptions of player in game design literature. In: B. Akira (ed.) Situated Play: Proceedings of the 2007 Digital Games Research Association Conference, (pp. 456–465). The University of Tokyo, Tokyo.
Sotamaa, O., Ermi, L., Jäppinen, A., Laukkanen, T., Mäyrä, F., & Nummela, J. (2005). The Role of Players in Game Design: A Methodological Perspective. In Proceedings of the 6th DAC Conference, (pp. 34 – 42). Copenhagen.
Súilleabháin, G. Ó., & Sime, J. A. (2010). Games for learning and learning transfer. In Roisin Donnelly, K.K.C.O., Jen Harvey (ed.) Critical design and effective tools for e-learning in higher education: Theory into practice, (pp. 113–126). IGI Global Publication.
Ueda, F. (2005). Shadow of the Colussus. Sony Computer Entertainment.
Wilson, D., Sicart, M. (2010). Now it’s personal: on abusive game design. In Proceedings of the International Academic Conference on the Future of Game Design and Technology, Futureplay ’10, (pp. 40–47). ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/1920778.1920785.
Winn, B. (2008). The design, play, and experience framework. In Handbook of Research on Effective Electronic Gaming in Education, (pp. 1010–1024). IGI Global Publication, Hershey, Philadelphia.
Yeh, Y. C. (2004). Nurturing reflective teaching during critical-thinking instruction in a computer simulation program. Computer & Education, 42(2), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(03)00071-X.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Khaled, R. (2018). Questions Over Answers: Reflective Game Design. In: Cermak-Sassenrath, D. (eds) Playful Disruption of Digital Media. Gaming Media and Social Effects. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1891-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1891-6_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-1889-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-1891-6
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)