Skip to main content

Research on the Technology Transfer Efficiency Evaluation in Industry-University-Research Institution Collaborative Innovation and Its Affecting Factors Based on the Two-Stage DEA Model

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 502))

Abstract

The traditional technical efficiency measurement regards the technology transfer system as a “black box” and doesn’t penetrate the internal operation mechanism of the system. This paper opens the technology transfer system “black box” of industry-university-research institution (IUR) collaborative innovation, researches the internal structure of the system, and deconstructs the system into two stages: technology innovation stage and industrial value creation stage. On this basis, this paper calculates the technology transfer efficiency based on the two-stage DEA model. The result shows that the overall technology transfer efficiency in IUR collaborative innovation is low, and the bottlenecks for improving the technology transfer efficiency are different for different provinces. Through analyzing the internal and external factors of the system, this paper finds that the good cooperative relationship between enterprises and scientific research institutions can improve the efficiency of technology transfer. Refer to environmental factors, the government supports, the market competition and the demand for new products have positive impact on the efficiency of technology transfer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Anderson TR, Daim TU, Lavoie FF (2007) Measuring the efficiency of university technology transfer. Technovation 27(5):306–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hsu DW, Shen YC et al (2015) Toward successful commercialization of university technology: performance drivers of university technology transfer in Taiwan. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 92:25–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Antonelli C, Schumpeterian A (2015) Growth model: wealth and directed technological change. J Technol Transf 40(2):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  4. Siegel DS, Waldman D, Link A (2003) Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study. Res Policy 32(1):27–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kalar B, Antoncic B (2015) Assessing the relative performance of U.K. university technology transfer offices: parametric and non-parametric evidence. Technovations 36(37):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  6. Thursby JG, Thursby MC (2002) Who is selling the ivory tower? Sources of growth in university licensing. Manag Sci 48(1):90–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Liao S, Xu S (2009) Analyzing on university-enterprise technology transfer efficiency and its influencing factors in China. Sci Sci Manag S&T 11:012

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ho MHC, Liu JS et al (2014) A new perspective to explore the technology transfer efficiencies in US universities. J Technol Transf 39(2):247–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bekkers R, Freitas IMB (2008) Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: to what degree do sectors also matter? Res Policy 37(10):1837–1853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rao K, Meng X et al (2011) University patent technology transfer in UK and its referential experiences. In: Forum on Science and Technology in China, vol 2, p 027

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yuan H (2004) On the obstacles and approaches of converting scientific researches intopositive results at universities. Res Educ Tsinghua Univ 3:016

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhao D, Zuo M, Deng XN (2015) Examining the factors influencing cross-project knowledge transfer: an empirical study of it services firms in China. Int J Proj Manag 33(2):325–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rasmussen E, Moen Ø, Gulbrandsen M (2006) Initiatives to promote commercialization of university knowledge. Technovation 26(4):518–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tian M, Cao Z (2007) The successful technology transfer of Massachusetts institute of technology. Sci Sci Manag S&T 4:004

    Google Scholar 

  15. Intarakumnerd P, Charoenporn P (2015) Impact of stronger patent regimes on technology transfer: the case study of Thai automotive industry. Res Policy 44(7):1314–1326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li W (2003) Analysis of the factors impacting on tech-transfer of Chinese universities and national research institutes. Sci Sci Manag S&T 24(6):48–51

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ye J, Yang Y et al (2015) Comparing efficiency of university technology transfers: evidence from chinese and U.S. university patents. Forum Sci Technol China 1:150–155

    Google Scholar 

  18. Li T (2014) Study on efficiency evaluation and cooperative governance of China’s regional innovation. Ph.D. thesis, Huibei, University of Science and Technology of China

    Google Scholar 

  19. Peng Y, Chen S et al (2013) Efficiency based on the two-stage correlative DEA-Malmquist index on western regional technical innovation. Oper Res Manag Sci 22(3):162–168

    Google Scholar 

  20. Markman GD, Gianiodis PT et al (2005) Innovation speed: transferring university technology to market. Res Policy 34(7):1058–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Llor A (2007) Delay from patent filing to technology transfer: a statistical study at a major public research organization. Technovation 27(8):446–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen K, Li X, Yang G (2014) A comparison of technology transfer efficiency of domestic and foreign universities: based on the DEA-Malmquist method. Sci Sci Manag S&T 35(7):98–106

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hall GH (1983) Patents and R&D: searching for a lag structure. NBER working paper

    Google Scholar 

  24. Liu Z, Chen X (2013) Evaluation of Chinese science parks on innovation efficiency-time lag effect based investigation. Chin J Manag 12(25):727–732 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yuan C, Gao J, Sun H (2014) The impact of local government support and regional market uncertainty on the efficiency of university technology transfer-evidence from chinese “211-project” universities. R&D Manag 25(3):10–17

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nickell SJ (1996) Competition and corporate performance. J Polit Econ 104:724–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen Z, Yu X (2007) A study on impact of external environment on R&D input of enterprises: empirical analysis on panel data of Chinese industries. Sci Res Manag 28(2):78–84

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hui K, Wu Q, Hu Y (2012) The effects of intellectual property rights protection on technology innovation: empirical analysis based on technology trading market and provincial panel data in China. J Financ Econ 28(8):15–25

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research work is supported by Major Programs of National Social Science Funds of China (71571126) and is also supported by Department of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province Program (2014RK10).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuanchun Yu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yu, Y., Gu, X., Chen, Y. (2017). Research on the Technology Transfer Efficiency Evaluation in Industry-University-Research Institution Collaborative Innovation and Its Affecting Factors Based on the Two-Stage DEA Model. In: Xu, J., Hajiyev, A., Nickel, S., Gen, M. (eds) Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 502. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1837-4_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1837-4_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-1836-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-1837-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics