Skip to main content

Evaluating the Quality Performance of Reconstructive Community Public Health Service Based on Weighted TOPSIS Method

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 502))

Abstract

The evaluation of community public health services (CPHS) has received increasing attention in today’s social environment. This study focuses on developing an evaluation model to test the quality of community public health service organizations, (CPHS) using a fuzzy Delphi method and weighted TOPSIS method. The main contributions of this paper are the evaluation system for reconstructive community public health service systems by using specific cases. Specifically, it can save resources in a reliable way by adopting a quantifiable evaluation index system, utilising software calculation methods, and combining the construction services. Moreover, the system can be easily used in CPHSO building after disasters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Baykasoğlu A, Gölcük I (2015) Development of a novel multiple-attribute decision making model via fuzzy cognitive maps and hierarchical fuzzy topsis. Inf Sci 301:75–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen F, Wang J, Deng Y (2015a) Road safety risk evaluation by means of improved entropy topsis-RSR. Saf Sci 79:39–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen K, Kou G et al (2015b) Visualizing market structure through online product reviews: Integrate topic modeling, topsis, and multi-dimensional scaling approaches

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ding J (2012) The current situation of community health service quality evaluation and countermeasures research. PhD thesis, Xiangtan University, (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ding Y, Smith HJ et al (2013) Factors influencing the provision of public health services by village doctors in Hubei and Jiangxi provinces, China. Bull World Health Org 91(1):64–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gao C, Wei D et al (2013) A modified evidential methodology of identifying influential nodes in weighted networks. Physica A Stat Mech Appl 392(21):5490–5500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Han D (2012) Evaluation of the quality of hospital medical comprehensive evaluation method research, pp 15–21, (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  8. General Office of the Ministry of Health (2013) Sichuan province demonstration in 2012 community health service center of evaluation index system, pp 1–6, (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hu H, Liang W et al (2010) Establishment and evaluation of a model of a community health service in an underdeveloped area of China. Public Health 124(4):206–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jayant A, Gupta P et al (2014) Topsis-ahp based approach for selection of reverse logistics service provider: a case study of mobile phone industry. Procedia Eng 97:2147–2156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu H, Gao S, Rizzo JA (2011) The expansion of public health insurance and the demand for private health insurance in rural china. China Econ Rev 22(1):28–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Saremi M, Mousavi SF, Sanayei A (2009) TQM consultant selection in smes with topsis under fuzzy environment. Expert Syst Appl 36(2):2742–2749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sekhar C, Patwardhan M, Vyas V (2015) A Delphi-ahp-topsis based framework for the prioritization of intellectual capital indicators: a SMEs perspective. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 189:275–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sichuan Province Health Department of Sichuan Province (2010) Community basic public health service project performance evaluation method, pp 13–16, (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Xu S, Zhang C, Yang J (2013) The topsis evaluation on carbon emission economic efficiency. Asian Agric Res 5(6):1

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Youth Funds of Sichuan Provincial Education Department (Grant NO.14ZB0014), the Key Funds of Sichuan Social Science Research Institute “System Science and Enterprise Development Research” (Grant NO. Xq15B09), and the Humanities Social and Sciences Research Funds of Education Ministry (Grant no.15XJC630001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lu Gan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jiang, S., Li, Y., Jiang, P., Gan, L. (2017). Evaluating the Quality Performance of Reconstructive Community Public Health Service Based on Weighted TOPSIS Method. In: Xu, J., Hajiyev, A., Nickel, S., Gen, M. (eds) Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 502. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1837-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1837-4_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-1836-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-1837-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics