Dynamical Similarity Analysis of EEG Recordings



Electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings contain a large amount of information about physiological and pathological processes in the brain and serve as one of the important tools in clinical diagnosis and research regarding epilepsy. Dynamical similarity analysis is applied to characterize EEG changes in different absence seizure states. The average similarity measure of a pair of EEG signals in the same seizure states and across different seizure states is calculated using an improved dynamical similarity method. The results show that the average similarity measures between EEG segments within the seizure-free state are close to 1, suggesting that the EEG segments within the seizure-free state share the same dynamic characteristics. The similarity measures between EEG segments across different seizure states are typically smaller, indicating that the changes of dynamic characteristics can be found during different absence seizure states.


EEG Dynamical similarity Seizure states 


  1. Buzsaki G. Rhythms of the brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cao L. Practical method for determining the minimum embedding dimension of a scalar time series. Phys D. 1997;110:43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Danober L, Deransart C, Depaulis A, et al. Pathophysiological mechanisms of genetic absence epilepsy in the rat. Prog Neurobiol. 1998;55:27–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ding M, Grebogi C, Ott E, Sauer T, Yorke J. Estimating correlation dimension from a chaotic time series: when does plateau onset occur? Phys D. 1993;69:404–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eckmann J, Ruelle D. Fundamental limitation for estimating dimension and Lyapunov exponents in dynamical systems. Phys D. 1992;56:185–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ferri R, Chiaramonti R, Elia M, Musumeci S, Ragazzoni A, Stam C. Nonlinear EEG analysis during sleep in premature and full-term infants. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;114:1176–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Fraser AM, Swinney HL. Independent coordinates for strange attractors from mutual information. Phys Rev A. 1986;33:1134–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grassberger P, Procaccia I. Characterization of strange attractors. Phys Rev Lett. 1983;50:346–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grassberger P, Schreiber T, Schaffrath C. Nonlinear time sequence analysis. Int J Bifurcation Chaos. 1991;1:521–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gribkov D, Gribkova V. Learning dynamics from non-stationary time series: analysis of electroencephalograms. Phys Rev E. 2000;61:6538–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jansen B, Rit V. Electroencephalogram and visual evoked potential generation in mathematical model of coupled cortical columns. Biol Cybern. 1995;73:357–66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kim HS, Eykholt R, Salas JD. Nonlinear dynamics, delay times, and embedding windows. Phys D. 1999;127:48–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lehnertz K, Elger C. Can epileptic seizures be predicted? Evidence from nonlinear time series analysis of brain electrical activity. Phys Rev Lett. 1998;80:5019–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Le Van Quyen M, Martinerie J, Baulac M, Varela F. Anticipating epileptic seizures in real time by a non-linear analysis of similarity between EEG recordings. NeuroReport. 1999;10:2149–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li X, Ouyang G, Yao X. Dynamical characteristics of pre-epileptic seizures in rats with recurrence quantification analysis. Phys Lett A. 2004;333:164–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lopes da Silva FH, Hoek A, Smith H, Zetterberg LH. Model of brain rhythmic activity. Kybernetik. 1974;15:27–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Navarro V, Martinerie J, Le Van Quyen M, Clemenceau S, Baulac M, Adam C, Varela F. Seizures anticipation in human neocortical partial epilepsy. Brain. 2002;125:640–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Packard N, Crutchfield J, Farmer J, Shaw R. Geometry from a time series. Phys Rev Lett. 1980;45(9):712–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rabinovich M, Varona P, Selverston A, Abarbanel H. Dynamical principles in neuroscience. Rev Mod Phys. 2006;78:1213–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rapp P, Zimmerman I, Alano A, Deguzman G, Greenbaum N. Experimental studies of chaotic neural behaviour cellular activity and electroencephalographic signal. In: Othmer H, editor. Nonlinear oscillations in biology and chemistry, Lecture notes in biomathematics. Berlin: Springer; 1985. p. 175–205.Google Scholar
  21. Rogowski Z, Gath I, Bental E. On the prediction of epileptic seizures. Biol Cybern. 1981;42:9–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Sarkara M, Leong T. Characterization of medical time series using fuzzy similarity-based fractal dimensions. Artif Intell Med. 2003;27:201–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schreiber T, Schmitz A. Classification of time series data with nonlinear similarity measures. Phys Rev Lett. 1997;78:1475–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stacey W, Litt B. Technology insight: neuroengineering and epilepsy-designing devices for seizure control. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2008;4:190–201.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Stam C. Nonlinear dynamical analysis of EEG and MEG: review of an emerging field. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005;116(10):2266–301.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Takens F. In: Rand DA, Young LS, editors. Dynamical systems and turbulence, Lecture notes in mathematics. Berlin: Springer; 1981. p. 336.Google Scholar
  27. Thiel M, Romano M, Kurths J. Influence of observational noise on the recurrence quantification analysis. Phys D. 2002;171:138–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wendling F, Bellanger JJ, Bartolomei F, Chauvel P. Relevance of nonlinear lumped-parameter models in the analysis of depth-EEG epileptic signals. Biol Cybern. 2000;83:367–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Widman G, Schreiber T, Rehberg B, Hoeft A, Elger C. Quantification of depth of anesthesia by nonlinear time series analysis of brain electrical activity. Phys Rev E. 2000;62:4898–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wolf A, Swift JB, Swinney HL, et al. Determining Lyapunov exponents from a time series. Phys D. 1985;16:285–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain ResearchBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Center for Collaboration and Innovation in Brain and Learning SciencesBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations