Skip to main content

Wiring the Tin–Silver–Copper Alloy by Fused Deposition Modeling

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Innovative Design and Development Practices in Aerospace and Automotive Engineering

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

  • 3260 Accesses

Abstract

This paper aims at investigating the feasibility of extrusion and molding a low-melting point metal, Sn–Ag–Cu alloy, on a substrate by fused deposition modeling (FDM). Two Sn–Ag–Cu alloys, one is eutectic Sn–3.0Ag–0.5Cu (SAC305) and another non-eutectic Sn–0.3Ag–0.7Cu (SAC307), are studied for their molding resolutions, material compositions, tensile strength, tear strength, and sheet resistivities after FDM process. The FDM system is assembled by the authors. The molding resolutions are measured by caliper and micrometer. The material compositions are analyzed by energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS). The tensile strengths and tear strengths are measured by Lloyd-LS1 tensile tester. The sheet resistivities are measured by four-point probe station. Some conclusions are drawn according to the experiments. For better resolution, the extrusion temperature is a little higher than the melting point of the material. The FDM process significantly reduces the tensile strength of the materials. For the tear strength, SAC305 is better than SAC0307. The higher the extrusion temperature is, the higher the sheet resistivity is.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Tang Y, Loh H, Wong Y, Fuh J, Lu L, Wang X (2003) Direct laser sintering of a copper-based alloy for creating three-dimensional metal parts. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 140: 368–372

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arnold CB, Serra P, Piqué A (2007) Laser direct-write techniques for printing of complex materials. MRS Bulletin, 32: 23–31

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jones J B, Wimpenny D I, Chudasama R, Gibbons G J (2011) Printed circuit boards by selective deposition and processing. In: Proceedings of 22nd Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Aug. 8–10, Austin, TX, USA, 639–656

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shellabear M, Danzig A, Heugel M, Kotila J, Nyrhilä O (2001) The Breakthrough to 20 Micron Layers-Increasing Precision and Efficiency in Direct Metal Laser Sintering. In: Proceedings of Rapid 2001 International User’s Conf, 245–252

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kim G, Oh Y (2008) A benchmark study on rapid prototyping processes and machines: quantitative comparisons of mechanical properties, accuracy, roughness, speed, and material cost. Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 222: 201–215

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bourell D, Stucker B, Espalin D, Arcaute K, Rodriguez D, Medina F (2010) Fused deposition modeling of patient-specific polymethylmethacrylate implants. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 16: 164–173

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kalita S J, Bose S, Hosick H L, Bandyopadhyay A (2003) Development of controlled porosity polymer-ceramic composite scaffolds via fused deposition modeling. Materials Science and Engineering C, 23: 611–620

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cao T, Ho K-H, Teoh S-H (2003) Scaffold design and in vitro study of osteochondral coculture in a three-dimensional porous polycaprolactone scaffold fabricated by fused deposition modeling. Tissue engineering, 9: 103–112

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fischer M, Schöppner V (2013) Some investigations regarding the surface treatment of Ultem*9085 parts manufactured with fused deposition modeling. In: Proceedings of 24th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, Aug. 12–14, 805–815

    Google Scholar 

  10. Masood S, Song W (2004) Development of new metal/polymer materials for rapid tooling using fused deposition modelling. Materials & Design, 25: 587–594

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lee B, Abdullah J, Khan Z (2005) Optimization of rapid prototyping parameters for production of flexible ABS object. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 169: 54–61

    Google Scholar 

  12. Thrimurthulu K, Pandey P M, Reddy N V (2004) Optimum part deposition orientation in fused deposition modeling. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 44: 585–594

    Google Scholar 

  13. Anitha R, Arunachalam S, Radhakrishnan P (2001) Critical parameters influencing the quality of prototypes in fused deposition modelling. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 118: 385–388

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sood A K, Ohdar R, Mahapatra S (2009) Improving dimensional accuracy of Fused Deposition Modelling processed part using grey Taguchi method. Materials & Design, 30: 4243–4252

    Google Scholar 

  15. Choi S, Lee J, Guo F, Bieler T, Subramanian K, Lucas J (2001) Creep properties of Sn-Ag solder joints containing intermetallic particles. Journal of Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, 53: 22–26

    Google Scholar 

  16. Moon K-W, Boettinger W, Kattner U, Biancaniello F, Handwerker C (2000) Experimental and thermodynamic assessment of Sn-Ag-Cu solder alloys. Journal of Electronic Materials, 29: 1122–1136

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kim H, Liou H, Tu K (1995) Three‐dimensional morphology of a very rough interface formed in the soldering reaction between eutectic SnPb and Cu. Applied Physics Letters, 66: 2337–2339

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kim K, Huh S, Suganuma K (2003) Effects of intermetallic compounds on properties of Sn-Ag-Cu lead-free soldered joints. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 352: 226–236

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lu H Y, Balkan H, Ng K S (2006) Microstructure evolution of the Sn-Ag-y% Cu interconnect. Microelectronics Reliability, 46: 1058–1070

    Google Scholar 

  20. Perez K B, Williams C B (2013) Combining additive manufacturing and direct write for integrated electronics-a review. In: Proceedings of 24th International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium-An Additive Manufacturing Conference, SFF, 962–979

    Google Scholar 

  21. MacDonald E, Salas R, Espalin D, Perez M, Aguilera E, Muse D (2014) 3D printing for the rapid prototyping of structural electronics. Access IEEE, 2: 234–242

    Google Scholar 

  22. Espalin D, Muse D W, MacDonald E, Wicker R B (2014) 3D Printing multifunctionality: structures with electronics. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 72: 963–978

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kief C J, Zufelt B K, Christensen J H, Mee J K (2011) Trailblazer: proof of concept CubeSat Mission for SPA-1. AIAA Infotech, 1–7

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan with the contact number: MOST 103-2221-E-197-015-MY2.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuh-Chung Hu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hu, YC., Wang, YT., Wu, HH. (2017). Wiring the Tin–Silver–Copper Alloy by Fused Deposition Modeling. In: Bajpai, R.P., Chandrasekhar, U. (eds) Innovative Design and Development Practices in Aerospace and Automotive Engineering. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1771-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1771-1_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-1770-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-1771-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics