Abstract
Organized screening with Papanicolaou smear has reduced the prevalence of invasive cervix cancer in developed world, and in the recent screening guidelines, HPV as a co-test after 30 years of age has been added to Pap smear. The goal of screening is to find persistent HPV infection, detect and treat high-grade CIN, i.e. CIN 2 and 3 (with no margin of error), and not to miss invasive cancer. In this chapter, cytology requiring evaluation will be discussed with regard to unsatisfactory specimen and various epithelial cell abnormalities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, et al. The 2001 Bethesda system: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA. 2002;287(16):2114–9. doi:10.1001/jama.287.16.2114.
Guidelines – American Society for colposcopy and cervical pathology. www.asccp.org/guidelines.
Katki HA, Kinney WK, Fetterman B, Lorey T, Poitras NE, Cheung L, et al. Cervical cancer risk for women undergoing concurrent testing for human papillomavirus and cervical cytology: a population-based study in routine clinical practice. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:663Y72.
Katki HA, Schiffman M, Castle PE, Fetterman B, Poitras NE, Lorey T, et al. Five-year risks of CIN 3+ and cervical cancer among women who test Pap-negative but are HPV-positive. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2013;17:S56–63.
Katki HA, Schiffman M, Castle PE, Fetterman B, Poitras NE, Lorey T, et al. Five-year risk of cervical cancer and CIN3 for HPV-positive and HPV-negative high-grade Pap results. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2013;17:S50–5.
Stoler MH, Wright TC, Sharma A, Apple R, Gutekunst K, Wright TL. High-risk human papillomavirus testing in women with ASC-US cytology: results from the ATHENA HPV study. Am J Clin Pathol. 2011;135:466–75.
Einstein MH, Martens MG, Garcia FA, Ferris DG, Mitchell AL, Day SP, et al. Clinical validation of the Cervista HPV HR and 16/18 genotyping tests for use in women with ASC-US cytology. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;118:116–22.
Guido R, Schiffman M, Solomon D, Burke L, for the ASCUS/LSIL Triage Study (ALTS) Group. Post-colposcopy management strategies for women referred with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of human papillomavirus DNA-positive atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: a two-year prospective trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:1401–5.
Moore G, Fetterman B, Cox JT, Poitras N, Lorey T, Kinney W, et al. Lessons from practice: risk of CIN3 or cancer associated with an LSIL or HPV-positive ASC-US screening result in women aged 21–24. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2010;14:97–102.
Arbyn M, Sasieni P, Meijer CJ, Clavel C, Koliopoulos G, Dillner J. Clinical applications of HPV testing: a summary of meta-analyses. Vaccine. 2006;24 Suppl 3:S78–89.
Katki HA, Gage JC, Schiffman M, Castle PE, Fetterman B, Poitras NE, et al. Follow-up testing after colposcopy: five-year risk of CIN 2+ after a colposcopic diagnosis of CIN 1 or less. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2013;5:S69–77.
Zhao C, Florea A, Onisko A, Austin RM. Histologic follow-up results in 662 patients with Pap test findings of atypical glandular cells: results from a large academic women’s hospital laboratory employing sensitive screening methods. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;114:383–9.
Simsir A, Carter W, Elgert P, Cangiarella J. Reporting endometrial cells in women 70 years and older: assessing the clinical usefulness of Bethesda 2001. Am J Clin Pathol. 2005;123:571–5.
Hoda RS, Loukeris K, Abdul-Karim FW. Gynecologic cytology on conventional and liquid-based preparations: a comprehensive review of similarities and differences. Diagn Cytopathol. 2012;41(3):257–78. doi:10.1002/dc.22842.
Hock YL, Ramaiah S, Wall ES, Harris AM, Marston L, Marshall J, et al. Outcome of women with inadequate cervical smears followed up for five years. J Clin Pathol. 2003;56:592–5.
Ransdell JS, Davey DD, Zaleski S. Clinicopathologic correlation of the unsatisfactory Papanicolaou smear. Cancer. 1997;81:139–43.
Siebers AG, Klinkhamer PJJM, Vedder JEM, Arbyn M, Bulten J. Causes and relevance of satisfactory and satisfactory but limited smears of liquid-based compared with conventional cervical cytology. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2012;136:76–83.
Buntinx F, Brouwers M. Relation between sampling device and detection of abnormality in cervical smears: a meta-analysis of randomized and quasi-randomised studies. BMJ. 1996;313:1285–90.
Martin-Hirsch P, Jarvis G, Kitchener H, Lilford R. Collection devices for obtaining cervical cytology samples. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;CD001036.
Huang A, Quinn M, Tan J. Outcome in women with no endocervical component on cervical cytology after treatment for high-grade cervical dysplasia. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;49:426–8.
Mitchell HS. Longitudinal analysis of histologic high-grade disease after negative cervical cytology according to endocervical status. Cancer. 2001;93:237–40.
Zhao C, Austin RM. Human papillomavirus DNA detection in ThinPrep Pap test vials is independent of cytologic sampling of the transformation zone. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;107:231–5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Suneja, A., Pandit, U. (2017). Management Recommendations in Abnormal Cytology. In: Mehta, S., Sachdeva, P. (eds) Colposcopy of Female Genital Tract. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1705-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1705-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-1704-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-1705-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)