Abstract
Over the last few decades, researchers concerned with human interaction have viewed knowledge not as residing solely in the individual mind, but as shared and produced in situated interaction. In particular, knowledge of the social world, including shared conventions, communicative norms, and social values, is first acquired by children from caregivers and others in activities and sequences of action, and is crucial for participating as a member of a community or society. An important way that humans relate and share knowledge in interaction and, in the process, construct their views of the social world, is through evaluating, or by making assessments. In this sense, assessments are not merely descriptions of the social world, but social actions and stances that are often responded to, aligned with, or contested in meaningful ways. Although there has been an increasing amount of analytical attention paid to assessments in adult interaction, there is comparatively little research focusing on young children. An analysis of children’s assessments in everyday interaction can shed light on ways in which young children use their linguistic resources, together with embodied resources, to display evaluative and emotional stances, perform social actions, constitute relationships, and co-construct knowledge with adults and other children.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The collection of data and transcription were partly supported with a Fulbright-Hays Doctoral Dissertation Year Abroad Grant (first author).
- 2.
The collection of data was partly supported by a JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (S) “Cultural formation of responsibility” (Project No. 196720002 head by Akira Takada) and JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) “Cultural and ecological foundations of education and learning: An anthropological study on rhythm, imitation, and exchange” (Project No. 24242035 headed by Akira Takada). The analysis was partly supported by a National University of Singapore Academic Research Fund FY2015-FRC2-014 for the project titled “Japanese Children’s Social Interaction and Language Use” (second author). Figures 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10 and 11 are used with permission from Akira Takada. Figures 7 and 8 were supplied by the first author.
References
Burdelski, M. (2015). Reported speech as cultural gloss and directive: Socializing norms of speaking and acting in Japanese caregiver-child triadic interaction. Text & Talk, 35(5), 575–595.
Burdelski, M., & Mitsuhashi, K. (2010). “She thinks you’re kawaii”: Socializing affect, gender, and relationships in a Japanese preschool. Language in Society, 39(1), 65–93.
Butler, C. W. (2008). Talk and social interaction in the playground. Hampshire, UK: Ashgate.
Clancy, P. M. (1985). The acquisition of Japanese. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (Vol. 1, pp. 373–524). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Clancy, P. M. (1999). The socialization of affect in Japanese mother-child conversation. In R. Kanagy (Ed.), Language socialization and affect in first and second language acquisition, Special issue, Journal of Pragmatics, 31(11), 1397–1421.
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Goodwin, M. H. (2007). Participation and embodied action in preadolescent girls’ assessment activity. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 40(4), 353–375.
Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H. (1987). Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments. IPRA Papers in Pragmatics, 1(1), 1–54.
Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H. (1992). Assessments and the construction of context. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 147–190). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goodwin, M. H., & Goodwin, C. (2000). Emotion within situated activity. In N. Budwig, I. Č. Užgiris, & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), Communication: An arena of development (pp. 33–54). Stamford, CT: Ablex Publishing Company.
Heritage, J. (2012). Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on language and social interaction, 45(1), 1–29.
Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2005). The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in assessment sequences. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68, 15–38.
Keel, S. (2015). Young children’s embodied pursuits of a response to their initial assessments. Journal of Pragmatics, 75, 1–24.
Kidwell, M., & Zimmerman, D. (2007). Joint attention in action. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(3), 592–611.
Lerner, G. H., & Zimmerman, D. H. (2002). Action and the appearance of action in the conduct of very young children. In P. Glenn, C. LeBaron, & J. Mandelbaum (Eds.), Studies in language and social interaction (pp. 441–457). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbarum.
Lerner, G. H., Zimmerman, D., & Kidwell, M. (2011). Formal structures of practical tasks: A resource for action in the social life of very young children. In C. Goodwin, C. LeBaron, & J. Streeck (Eds.), Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lindström, A., & Mondada, L. (2009). Assessments in social interaction: Introduction to the special issue. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42(4), 299–308.
Morita, E. (2005). Negotiation of contingent talk: The Japanese interactional particles ne and sa. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Morita, E. (2016). Kaiwa no hajime no ippo: Kodomo ni okeru soogokooishi ‘yo’ no shiyoo (The first step of conversation: Children’s use of interactional particle ‘yo’). In A. Takada, M. Kawashima, Y. Shimada (Eds.), Kosodate no Kaiwabunseki (Conversation Analysis of Childcare). Kyoto: Showado.
Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B. B. (1989). Language has a heart. The pragmatics of affect special issue of Text, 9(1), 7–25.
Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, E. A. (1988). Goffman and the Analysis of Conversation In P. Drew and A. Wootton (Eds.) Erving Goffman: Exploring the interaction order (pp. 89–135). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–382.
Sidnell, J. (2014). “Who knows best?”: Evidentiality and epistemic asymmetry in conversation. In J. Nuckolls & L. Michael (Eds.), Evidentiality in interaction (pp. 127–154). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Strauss, S., & Kawanishi, Y. (1996). Assessment strategies in Japanese, Korean, and American English. In. N. Akatsuka, S. Iwasaki, & S. Strauss (Eds.), Japanese/Korean linguistics, vol. 5 (pp. 149–165). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Wootton, T. (1997). Interaction and the development of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres.
Yamada, A. (1980) The development of syntactic devices for communication in the early stages of the acquisition of Japanese: case study. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Hawaii (cited in Clancy 1985).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Burdelski, M., Morita, E. (2017). Young Children’s Initial Assessments in Japanese. In: Bateman, A., Church, A. (eds) Children’s Knowledge-in-Interaction. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1703-2_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1703-2_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-1701-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-1703-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)