Advertisement

Technology pp 89-109 | Cite as

Does M&A Matter for R&D? Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Sector in India

  • Vidhisha VyasEmail author
  • K. Narayanan
Chapter
Part of the India Studies in Business and Economics book series (ISBE)

Abstract

It is widely accepted that technological expertise, market know-how, tacit knowledge and quick innovation are crucial corporate assets for facing increased competition. Mergers and acquisitions [M&A] has become a means for firms to acquire, absorb and exploit the knowledge assets of target firm. The present study investigates the relationship between M&A and innovation activities of pharmaceutical firms (post-M&A R&D intensity) for three post acquisition years and for average of three years. To analyze the impact, appropriate acquirer’s characteristics have been drawn from learning and innovation theory and financial economics theory. The findings of the paper suggest that acquisitions per se have a mixed impact on R&D intensity of firms in immediate post-acquisition years. Financial factors captured by leverage also appear to influence adversely the R&D intensity of acquiring firms. While technology imports through embodied capital goods boost acquiring firms’ R&D intensity, imports of disembodied technology lowers the need for R&D expenditure. Relatedness of target and acquiring firms and cross-border M&A, however, enhances R&D intensity in post-M&A period. This could imply that mergers and acquisitions of firms, if carried out in similar line of business, could boost innovative efforts in this industry in India.

Keywords

M&A R&D intensity Technology imports Leverage JEL classification: G34 C23 O32 

Notes

Acknowledgments

An earlier version of this paper was presented in the 9th Annual Conference of the Knowledge Forum held during October 2014. The authors are grateful to Professors Siddharthan and Goldar for their valuable feedback. The comment and suggestions received from other participants are also highly appreciated. The error(s) that remain are our own.

References

  1. Ahuja, G., & Katila, R. (2001). Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 197–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anand, J., & Singh, H. (1997). Asset redeployment, acquisitions, and corporate strategy in declining industries. Strategic Management Journal, 18(Special Issue), 99–118.Google Scholar
  3. Barkema, H. G., & Vermeulen, F. (1998). International expansion through start-up or acquisition: A learning perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bertrand, O. (2009). Effect of foreign acquisition on R&D activity: Evidence from firm level data of France. Research Policy, 38(6), 1021–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bertrand, O., & Zuniga, P. (2006). R&D and M&A: Are cross-border M&As different? An investigation of OECD countries. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24(2), 401–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cantwell, J., & Santangelo, G. (2002). M&As and the global strategies of TNCs. The Developing Economies, 40, 400–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Capron, L., & Mitchell, W. (1998). Bilateral resource redeployment and capabilities improvement following horizontal acquisitions. Industrial and Corporate Change, 7(3), 453–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cassiman, B., Colombo, M., Garonne, P., & Veugelers, R. (2005). The impact of M&A on the R&D process—An empirical analysis of the role of technological and market relatedness. Research Policy, 34(2), 195–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chakrabarti, A., Hauschildt, J., & Suverkrup, C. (1994). Does it pay to acquire technological firms? R&D Management, 24(1), 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cloodt, M., Hagedoorn, J., & Van Kranenburg, H. (2006). Mergers and acquisitions: Their effect on the innovative performance of companies in high-tech industries. Research Policy, 35(5), 642–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. The Economic Journal, 99(397), 569–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dalton, D. H., & Serpio, M. G. (1999). Globalizing industrial research and development. Washington DC, U.S.: Department of Commerce, Office of Technology Policy.Google Scholar
  14. Danzon, P. M., Epstein, A., & Nicholson, S. (2007). Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries. Managerial and Decision Economics, 28(4–5), 307–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dehejia, R. H., & Wahba, S. (2002). Propensity score matching methods for non-experimental causal studies. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(1), 151–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Desyllas, P., & Hughes, A. (2010). Do high technology acquirers become more innovative? Research Policy, 39(8), 1105–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ernst, H., & Vitt, J. (2000). The influence of corporate acquisitions on the behaviour of key inventors. R&D Management, 30(2), 105–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gantumur, T., & Stephan, A. (2007). Mergers & acquisitions and innovation performance in the telecommunications equipment industry. Electronic Working Paper Series, CESIS, No. 111.Google Scholar
  19. Gugler, K., Mueller, D. C., Yurtoglu, B. B., & Zulehner, C. (2003). The effects of mergers: An international comparison. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(5), 625–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hagedoorn, J., & Duysters, G. (2002). The effect of mergers and acquisitions on the technological performance of companies in a high-tech environment. Technology Analysis Strategic Management, 14(1), 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hall, B. H. (1990). The impact of corporate restructuring on industrial research and development. Special issue on Microeconomics: Brookings Papers on Economic Activity.Google Scholar
  22. Haspeslagh, P. C., & Jemison, D. B. (1991). Managing acquisitions: creating value through corporate renewal. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  23. Healy, P. M., Palepu, K. G., & Ruback, R. S. (1992). Does corporate performance improve after mergers? Journal of Financial Economics, 31(2), 135–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heckman, J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. (1997). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. Review of Economic Studies, 64(4), 605–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Henderson, R., & Cockburn, I. (1996). Scale, scope and spillovers: The determinants of research productivity in drug discovery. Rand Journal of Economics, 27(1), 32–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hennart, J. F., & Park, Y. R. (1993). Greenfield vs. acquisitions: The strategies of Japanese investors in United States. Management Science, 39, 1054–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hirano, K., Imbens, G. W., & Ridder, G. (2003). Efficient estimation of average treatment effects using the estimated propensity score. Econometrica, 71(4), 1161–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hitt, M., Hoskisson, R., Ireland, R. D., & Harrison, J. (1991). Are acquisitions: A poison pill for innovation? Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 693–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hitt, M., Hoskisson, R., Johnson, R. A., & Moesel, D. D. (1996). The market for corporate control and firm innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1084–1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Huber, G. P. (1991). Organization learning: The contribution processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2(1), 88–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329.Google Scholar
  32. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Makadok, R. (2001). Towarda synthesis of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views of rent creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22(5), 387–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Markides, C. M., & Ittner, C. D. (1994). Shareholder benefits from corporate international diversification: Evidence from US International Acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(2), 343–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Martin, R., & Alvarez, I. (2009). Technological effects of M&As in Spanish manufacturing. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(4), 761–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Miller, R. B. (1990). Do merger and acquisitions hurt R&D? Research Technology Management, 11–14.Google Scholar
  37. Myers, S. C., & Maljuf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Narayanan, K. (1998). Technology acquisition, de-regulation and competitiveness: A study of Indian automobile industry. Research Policy, 27(2), 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ornaghi, C. (2009). Mergers and innovation in big pharma. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 27(1), 70–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Prabhu, J. C., Chandy, R. K., & Ellis, M. (2005). The impact of acquisitions on innovation: Poison pill, placebo, or tonic? Journal of Marketing, 69(1), 114–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ranft, A. L., & Lord, M. D. (2002). Acquiringnewtechnologies and capabilities: A grounded model of acquisition implementation. Organization Science, 13(4), 420–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ravenscraft, D. J., & Scherer, F. M. (1987). Mergers. Brookings Institution, Washington: Sell-offs and Economic Efficiency.Google Scholar
  43. Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Smith, C. L., & Warner, J. B. (1979). Bankruptcy, secured debt, and optimal capital structure: A comment. Journal of Finance, 34(1), 247–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Teece, D., Pisano, G. P., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vermeulen, F., & Barkema, H. (2001). Learning through acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal, 44(3), 457–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Veugelers, R. (2008). Literature review in mergers & acquisitions. . In B. Cassiman & M. G. Colombo (Eds.), The innovation impact. New York, USA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  48. Wagner, M. (2011). Acquisition as a means for external technology sourcing: Complementary, substitutive or both? Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 28, 283–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IILM Institute of Business and ManagementGurgaonIndia
  2. 2.Department of Humanities and Social SciencesIITBombayIndia

Personalised recommendations