Advertisement

Technology pp 43-56 | Cite as

Business Group Affiliation and Innovation in Medium and High-Technology Industries in India

  • Surenderrao KomeraEmail author
  • P. J. Jijo Lukose
  • Subash Sasidharan
Chapter
Part of the India Studies in Business and Economics book series (ISBE)

Abstract

A distinct feature of many of the economies is the presence of business group (BG) firms. These group affiliated firms are known by various names such as Keiretsu in Japan, Chaebol in Korea, Jituanqiye in Taiwan, grupos economics in Latin America, business houses in India.

Keywords

Business Group Innovative Activity Sample Firm Negative Binomial Model Patent Activity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abadie, A., Drukker, D., Herr, J. L., & Imbens, G. W. (2004). Implementing matching estimators for average treatment effects in Stata. The Stata Journal, 4(3), 290–311.Google Scholar
  2. Aghion, P., Burgess, R., Reddding, S., & Zillibotti, F. (2005). Entry liberalization and inequality in industrial performance. Journal of European Economic Association, 3, 291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aghion, P., Reenen, J. V., & Zingales, L. (2013). Innovation and institutional ownership. American Economic Review, 103(1), 277–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ambrammal, S. K., & Sharma, R. (2015). Impact of patenting on firms’ performance: An empirical investigation based on manufacturing firms in India. Economics of Innovation and New Technology. doi: 10.1080/10438599.2015.1043767
  5. Belenzon, S., & Berkovitz, T. (2010). Innovation in business groups. Management Science, 56(3), 519–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernstein, S. (2015). Does going public affect innovation? Journal of Finance, 70, 1365–1403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blanchard, P., Huiban, J. P., & Sevestre, P. (2005). R&D and productivity in corporate groups: An empirical investigation using a panel of French firms. Annalesd’économieet de Statistique, 79(80), 461–485.Google Scholar
  8. Blundell, R., Griffith, R., & Van Reenen, J. (1999). Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms. The Review of Economic Studies, 66, 529–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carney, M., Gedajlovic, E. R., Heugens, P. P. M. A. R., Essen, M., & Oosterhout, J. H. (2011). Business group affiliation, performance, context, and strategy: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 437–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cefis, E., Rosenkranz, S., & Weitzel, U. (2009). Effects of coordinated strategies on product and process R&D. Journal of Economics, 96(3), 193–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chakrabarti, R., Megginson, W., & Yadav, P. K. (2008). Corporate governance in India. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 20, 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chang, S. J., Chung, C. N., & Mahmood, I. P. (2006). When and how does business group affiliation promote firm innovation? A tale of two emerging economies. Organization Science, 17(5), 637–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chittoor, R., Kale, P., & Puranam, P. (2014) Business groups in developing capital markets: Towards a complementary perspective. Strategic Management Journal. doi: 10.1002/smj.2287
  15. Filatotchev, I., Piga, C., & Dyomina, N. (2003). Network positioning and R&D activity: A study of Italian groups. R&D Management, 33(1), 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Griliches, Z. (1990). Patents statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4), 1661–1707.Google Scholar
  17. Gugler, K. (2001). Corporate governance and economic performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Guzzini, E., & Iacobucci, D. (2014a). Business group affiliation and R&D. Industry and Innovaton, 21(1), 20–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guzzini, E., & Iacobucci, D. (2014b). Ownership as R&D incentive in business groups. Small Business Economics, 43, 119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hsieh, T., Yeh, R., & Chen, Y. (2010). Business group characteristics and affiliated firm innovation: The case of Taiwan. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(4), 560–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kedia, B. L., Mukherjee, D., & Lahiri, S. (2006). Indian business groups: Evolution and transformation. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23, 559–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (1997). Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets? Harvard Business Review, 75(4), 41–51.Google Scholar
  23. Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (2000). Is group affiliation profitable in emerging markets? An analysis of diversified Indian business groups. Journal of Finance, 55(2), 867–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Khanna, T., & Rivkin, J. W. (2001). Estimating the performance effects of business groups in emerging markets. Strategic Management Journal, 22(1), 45–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kim, H., Kim, H., & Lee, P. M. (2008). Ownership structure and the relationship between financial slack and R&D investments: Evidence from Korean firms. Organization Science, 19(3), 404–418Google Scholar
  26. Komera, S. R., Lukose, J., & Sasidharan, S. (2014, October 27–29). Does business group affiliation encourage R&D activities? in Evidence from India, presented at the Ninth Annual Conference of the Forum for Global Knowledge Sharing.Google Scholar
  27. Lodh, S., Nandy, M., & Chen, J. (2014). Innovation and family ownership: Empirical evidence from India. Corporate governance: An international review, 22, 4–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mahmood, I. P., & Lee, C. Y. (2004). Business groups: Entry barrier-innovation debate revisited. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 54, 513–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maman, D. (2002). The emergence of business groups: Israel and South Korea compared. Organization Studies, 23(5), 737–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sarkar, J. (2010). Business groups in India. In A. M. Colpan, T. Hikino, & J. R. Lincoln (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of business groups. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Siddharthan, N. S. (1988). In-house R&D, imported technology and firm size: Lessons from Indian experience. Developing Economies, 26, 212–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Singh, D., & Gaur, A. S. (2013). Governance structure, innovation and internationalization: Evidence from India. Journal of International Management, 19, 300–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Surenderrao Komera
    • 1
    Email author
  • P. J. Jijo Lukose
    • 2
  • Subash Sasidharan
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute for Financial Management and ResearchChennaiIndia
  2. 2.Indian Institute of Management KozhikodeKozhikodeIndia
  3. 3.Indian Institute of Technology MadrasChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations