Abstract
In his classic 1962 study, Max Black showed convincingly how scientific theories are constructed through unconscious metaphorical reasoning, thus linking them to the experiences of the scientist, the social and historical contexts in which they emerge , and the image schemata that are established within specific scientific domains. Some works have looked at this representational phenomenon within education , but only sporadically. This chapter focuses on metaphorical arguments and how they guide the construction of educational theories that lead to models and diagrammatic strategies, which in turn guide the derivative educational practices. It will then examine the possibility that metaphor itself can be incorporated into actual teaching practices, illustrating how this can be done in the teaching of mathematics and second languages . The chapter, by documenting the connection between metaphors, models, diagrams, and learning theories, addresses edusemiotics in its both theoretical and empirical aspects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allwein, G., & Barwise, J. (Eds.). (1996). Logical reasoning with diagrams. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barker-Plummer, D., & Bailin, S. C. (1997). The role of diagrams in mathematical proofs. Machine Graphics and Vision, 8, 25–58.
Barker-Plummer, D., & Bailin, S. C. (2001). On the practical semantics of mathematical diagrams. In M. Anderson (Ed.), Reasoning with diagrammatic representations (pp. 339–355). Dordrecht: Springer.
Barwise, J., & Etchemendy, J. (1989). The liar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Black, M. (1962). Models and metaphors. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Chandrasekaran, B., Glasgow, J., & Narayanan, N. H. (Eds.). (1995). Diagrammatic reasoning: Cognitive and computational perspectives. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Danesi, M. (1995). Learning and teaching languages: The role of conceptual fluency. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5, 3–20.
Danesi, M. (2003). Conceptual metaphor theory and the teaching of mathematics: Findings of a pilot project. Semiotica, 145, 71–83.
Danesi, M. (2007). A conceptual metaphor framework for the teaching of mathematics. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 26(3), 225–236.
Danesi, M. (2016a). Language and mathematics: An interdisciplinary guide. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Danesi, M. (2016b). Conceptual fluency in second language teaching: An overview of problems, issues, research findings, and pedagogy. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 5, 145–153.
English, L. D. (Ed.). (1997). Mathematical reasoning: Analogies, metaphors, and images. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think. New York: Basic Books.
Fries, C. F. (1927). The teaching of the English language. New York: Appleton Century.
Fries, C. F. (1945). Teaching and learning English as a foreign language. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Hammer, E. (1995). Reasoning with sentences and diagrams. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 35, 73–87.
Hammer, E., & Shin, S. (1996). Euler and the role of visualization in logic. In J. Seligman & D. Westerståhl (Eds.), Logic, language and computation (Vol. 1, pp. 271–286). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Hammer, E., & Shin, S. (1998). Euler’s visual logic. History and Philosophy of Logic, 19, 1–29.
Hinkel, E. (2006). Culture in second language teaching and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Holme, R. (2004). Mind, metaphor and language teaching. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Holme, R. (2009). Cognitive linguistics and second language teaching. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Holme, R. (2012). Cognitive linguistics and the second language classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 46, 6–29.
Kecskes, I. (1999). Conceptual fluency and the use of situation-bound utterances in L2. Links & Letters, 7, 145–161.
Kecskes, I. (2000a). A cognitive-pragmatic approach to situation-bound utterances. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 605–625.
Kecskes, I. (2000b). Conceptual fluency and the use of situation-bound utterances in L2. Links & Letters, 7, 143–158.
Kiryuschenko, V. (2012). The visual and the virtual in theory, life and scientific practice: The case of Peirce’s quincuncial map projection. In M. Bockarova, M. Danesi, & R. Núñez (Eds.), Semiotic and cognitive science essays on the nature of mathematics (pp. 61–70). Munich: Lincom Europa.
Kulpa, Z. (2004). On diagrammatic representation of mathematical knowledge. In A. Sperti, G. Bancerek, & A. Trybulec (Eds.), Mathematical knowledge management (pp. 23–34). Dordrecht: Springer.
Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across cultures: Applied linguistics for language teachers. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Lado, R. (1964). Language teaching: A scientific approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.
Langer, S. K. (1948). Philosophy in a new key. New York: Mentor Books.
Marcus, S. (2012). Mathematics between semiosis and cognition. In M. Bockarova, M. Danesi, & R. Núñez (Eds.), Semiotic and cognitive science essays on the nature of mathematics. Lincom Europa: Munich.
Peirce, C. S. (1931–1935; 1958). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vols. 1–6, C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss, Eds.; Vols. 7 and 8, A. Burks, Ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press [cited as CP].
Popper, K. (1935). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Routledge.
Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and refutations. London: Routledge.
Roberts, D. D. (2009). The existential graphs of Charles S. Peirce. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Sebeok, T. A., & Danesi, M. (2000). The forms of meaning: Modeling systems theory and semiotics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 209–231.
Semetsky, I. (2007). Towards a semiotic theory of learning: Deleuze’s philosophy and educational experience. Semiotica, 164, 197–214.
Semetsky, I. (2010a). Information enough. The Semiotic Review of Books, 19(3), 9–10.
Semetsky, I. (Ed.). (2010b). Semiotics education experience. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Semetsky, I., & Stables, A. (Eds.). (2014). Pedagogy and edusemiotics: Theoretical challenges/practical opportunities. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Shin, S. (1994). The logical status of diagrams. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stjernfelt, F. (2007). Diagrammatology: An investigation on the borderlines of phenomenology, ontology, and semiotics. Dordrecht: Springer.
Uexküll, J. von (1909). Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tierre. Dordrecht: Springer.
Valeva, G. (1996). On the notion of conceptual fluency in a second language. In A. Pavlenko & R. S. Salaberry (Eds.), Cornell working papers in linguistics: Papers in second language acquisition and bilingualism (pp. 22–38). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Danesi, M. (2017). Metaphors, Models, and Diagrams in Educational Theories and Practices. In: Semetsky, I. (eds) Edusemiotics – A Handbook. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1495-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1495-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-1493-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-1495-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)