Skip to main content

Academic Culture and the Science of Signs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Edusemiotics – A Handbook

Abstract

Today’s academy culminates in universities, the central institution of education feeding the intellectual culture of human kind. In historical context , philosophy (science in the ‘cenoscopic’ sense of critical control of objectivity unaided by instruments), along with literature, preceded university life, but came to form an integral part of university curriculum . But modern science (in the ‘ideoscopic’ sense, knowledge that could never be attained without instruments) began its distinctive development in the dawning years of the 17th century, and its acceptance within the university was anything but smooth. Intellectual advance depends on logic, but old habits have to be overcome, and such displacement is seldom easy within culture . It took more than two centuries for modern science to gain its standing—a standing so firm that students now think of the university in terms of science above all, as evidenced in the acronym STEM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics) for early 21st century attempts at a core curriculum. Where is semiotics in such a scheme? The chapter presents semiosis as the subject matter of semiotic inquiry and elaborates on semiotics as a matrix of all sciences, social and natural notwithstanding. The chapter further specifies the features of semiotic consciousness and concludes by affirming the transdisciplinary as well as predisciplinary, rather than disciplinary, character of semiotics and edusemiotics .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Deely, J. (1990). Basics of semiotics. Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deely, J. (1994). The human use of signs, or elements of anthroposemiosis. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deely, J. (2001). Four ages of understanding: The first postmodern survey of philosophy from ancient times to the end of the twenty-first century. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Deely, J. N., & Danesi, M. (2012). Semiotic prologues. Ottawa: Legas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmeche, C. (1994). The garden in the machine. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, T. (1977). Structuralism and semiotics. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolescu, B. (2002). Manifesto of transdisciplinarity (K.-C. Voss, Trans.). Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1931–1935; 1958). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vols. 1–6, C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss, Eds.; Vols. 7 and 8, A. Burks, Ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [cited as CP].

    Google Scholar 

  • Poinsot, J. (1985). Tractatus de signis: The semiotic of John Poinsot. Berkeley: University of California Press [Corrected 2nd ed., 2013. South Bend: St. Augustine’s Press].

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T. A. (1976/1985). Contributions to the doctrine of signs. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T. A. (1979/1989). Semiosis in nature and culture. In The sign and its masters (pp. 3–26). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semetsky, I. (2009). Virtual ontology/real experiences. Transdisciplinarity in Science and Religion, 6(2009), 169–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semetsky, I., & Stables, A. (Eds.). (2014). Pedagogy and edusemiotics: Theoretical challenges/practical opportunities. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stables, A., & Semetsky, I. (2015). Edusemiotics: Semiotic philosophy as educational foundation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stjernfelt, F. (2007). Diagrammatology. An investigation on the borderlines of phenomenology, ontology, and semiotics. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D. (2008). Semiotics and other assorted stories. Unpublished term paper for Spring ‘Philosophy of Knowledge’ class at University of St. Thomas, Houston.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Deely .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Deely, J. (2017). Academic Culture and the Science of Signs. In: Semetsky, I. (eds) Edusemiotics – A Handbook. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1495-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1495-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-1493-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-1495-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics