Abstract
The Murut ethnic group is one of the largest indigenous groups in Sabah. They are known to use symbolic motifs to decorate their handicraft and traditional attires. The denotative and connotative meanings have been adapted into the motifs based on their experience and environment. In the effort of preserving the motifs through application in both traditional and non-traditional medium, the message or theme visually communicated to the viewers through the motifs has to be carefully regarded to avoid misinterpretations. This study aims to evaluate the viewers’ comprehension of the denotation and connotation conveyed in select traditional Murut motifs. This study uses a mixed-method approach through the usage of unstructured interviews with elders and representatives of the Murut ethnic group; as well as questionnaires testing 55 individuals with backgrounds in art and design, of their comprehension of the denotative and connotative meanings of select Murut motifs. Through the interviews, the researchers concluded that the Murut community is, right now, focusing more on preserving the form of the motifs in its traditional medium with less focus on the denotative and connotative meanings. The results of the questionnaires suggested a more favourable recognition towards the anthropomorphic motifs compared to zoomorphic, phytomorphic and tool-based motifs.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barthes, R. (1964). Elements of semiology. New York: Hill and Wang.
Chin, M. (2009, December 6). Efforts to popularise cultural art lacking in Sabah. Daily Express, p. 5.
Chin, M. (2010, January 17). Murut- ke hadapan dalam idea perpaduan. Daily Express, p. 5.
Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2010). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.
Hose, C., & McDougall, W. (2005). The pagan tribes of Borneo (reprint). London: Adamant Media Corporation.
Ibrahim, I. (2012). Warisan Motif dan Corak Etnik Murut (2nd ed.). Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia: Unit Penerbitan, Universiti Malaysia Sabah.
Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2005). Practical research (8th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.
Lin, S. (2013). Oriental motifs in modern design. Hong Kong: Send Points Publishing.
Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2002). Qualitative communication research methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Morgan, J., & Welton, P. (1992). See what i mean? An introduction to visual communication (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
Polunin, I. (1959, June). A note on visual non-literary methods of communication among the Muruts of North Borneo. Man, 59, 97–99.
Pugh-Kitingan, J. (2012). Murut. Murut dan Pelbagai Etnik Kecil Lain di Sabah. Kuala Lumpur: Institut Terjemahan & Buku Malaysia.
Woolley, G. C. (1932). Murut Basketwork. Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, 10(1), 23–29.
Young, J. (2010). Cultural Appropriation and the Arts. West Sussex, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
Zainal Abidin, B. (Ed.). (1995). Glosari budaya Malaysia: Corak dan Motif. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mahmud, N., Zulkiply, A., Rahim, R.A. (2016). Assessing the Denotation and Connotation in Traditional Motifs of the Murut Ethnic Group. In: Abdullah, M., Yahya, W., Ramli, N., Mohamed, S., Ahmad, B. (eds) Regional Conference on Science, Technology and Social Sciences (RCSTSS 2014). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1458-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1458-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-1456-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-1458-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)