Abstract
Thyroidectomy performed via the midline transverse incision remains the standard thyroidectomy approach ever since Theodor Kocher revolutionised thyroid surgery with his technique in the 1800s. With enhanced optics and development of energy devices capable of sealing moderate-calibre (5–8 mm) vessels, the ability to perform thyroidectomy through small midline incisions or via remote access incisions is made possible. Moreover, the desire of some patients to avoid conspicuous midline neck scars led to the push for alternate approaches to the thyroid through remote-access incisions. In this chapter, we will review the evidence in the use of endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy in the management of thyroid diseases.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The ATA statement did not qualify the definition of thin habitus, but many authors have used an arbitrary BMI cutoff of less than 35–40 in transaxillary and retroauricular thyroidectomies [12, 13].
References
Miccoli P, Berti P, Marco R, Massimo C, Materazzi G, Galleri D. Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy. Am J Surg. 2001;181:567–70. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLG.0b013e318162cad6.
Pisanu A, Podda M, Reccia I, Porceddu G, Uccheddu A. Systematic review with meta-analysis of prospective randomized trials comparing minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) and conventional thyroidectomy (CT). Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2013;398(8):1057–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-013-1125-y.
Ikeda Y, Takami H, Niimi M, Kan S, Sasaki Y, Takayama J. Endoscopic thyroidectomy by the axillary approach. Surg Endosc. 2001;15(11):1362–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640080139.
Ohgami M, Ishii S, Arisawa Y, et al. Scarless endoscopic thyroidectomy: breast approach for better cosmesis. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 2000;10(1):1–4. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0033967740&partnerID=tZOtx3y1.
Kang SW, Lee SC, Lee SH, et al. Robotic thyroid surgery using a gasless, transaxillary approach and the da Vinci S system: the operative outcomes of 338 consecutive patients. Surgery. 2009;146(6):1048–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2009.09.007.
Byeon HK, Kim DH, Chang JW, et al. Comprehensive application of robotic retroauricular thyroidectomy: the evolution of robotic thyroidectomy. Laryngoscope. 2016;126(8):1952–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.25763.
Wilhelm T, Metzig A. Endoscopic minimally invasive thyroidectomy (eMIT): a prospective proof-of-concept study in humans. World J Surg. 2011;35(3):543–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0846-0.
Nakajo A, Arima H, Hirata M, et al. Trans-oral video-assisted neck surgery (TOVANS). A new transoral technique of endoscopic thyroidectomy with gasless premandible approach. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(4):1105–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2588-6.
Wang C, Zhai H, Liu W, et al. Thyroidectomy: a novel endoscopic oral vestibular approach. Surgery (United States). 2014;155(1):33–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2013.06.010.
Anuwong A. Transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach: a series of the first 60 human cases. World J Surg. 2016;40(3):491–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3320-1.
Berber E, Bernet V, Fahey T 3rd, et al. American Thyroid Association statement on remote access thyroid surgery. Thyroid. 2016;26(3):331–7. https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2015.0407.
Terris DJ, Singer MC, Seybt MW. Robotic facelift thyroidectomy: II. Clinical feasibility and safety. Laryngoscope. 2011;121(8):1636–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.21832.
Holsinger FC, Chung WY. Robotic thyroidectomy. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2014;47(3):373–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2014.03.001.
Lee KE, Kim E, Koo DH, Choi JY, Kim KH, Youn YK. Robotic thyroidectomy by bilateral axillo-breast approach: review of 1026 cases and surgical completeness. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(8):2955–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2863-1.
Lee J, Yun JH, Choi UJ, Kang SW, Jeong JJ, Chung WY. Robotic versus endoscopic thyroidectomy for thyroid cancers: a multi-institutional analysis of early postoperative outcomes and surgical learning curves. J Oncol. 2012;2012:1. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/734541.
Byeon HK, Holsinger FC, Tufano RP, et al. Endoscopic retroauricular thyroidectomy: preliminary results. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(1):355–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4202-1.
Choi JY, Lee KE, Chung KW, et al. Endoscopic thyroidectomy via bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA): review of 512 cases in a single institute. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(4):948–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1973-x.
Bakkar S, Materazzi G, Biricotti M, et al. Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) from A to Z. Surg Today. 2016;46(2):255–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-015-1241-0.
Miccoli P, Biricotti M, Matteucci V, Ambrosini CE, Wu J, Materazzi G. Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: reflections after more than 2400 cases performed. Surg Endosc. 2015;30:2489–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4503-4.
Shimazu K, Shiba E, Tamaki Y, et al. Endoscopic thyroid surgery through the axillo-bilateral-breast approach. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2003;13(3):196–201. https://doi.org/10.1097/00129689-200306000-00011.
Lee HY, You JY, Woo SU, et al. Transoral periosteal thyroidectomy: cadaver to human. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(4):898–904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3749-6.
Witzel K, Von Rahden BHA, Kaminski C, Stein HJ. Transoral access for endoscopic thyroid resection. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(8):1871–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9734-6.
Clark JH, Kim HY, Richmon JD. Transoral robotic thyroid surgery. Gland Surg. 2015;4(5):429–34. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2015.02.02.
Holsinger FC, Terris DJ, Kuppersmith RB. Robotic thyroidectomy: operative technique using a transaxillary endoscopic approach without CO2 insufflation. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2010;43(2):381–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2010.01.007.
Singer MC, Terris DJ. Robotic facelift thyroidectomy. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2014;47(3):425–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2014.02.001.
Ikeda Y, Takami H, Sasaki Y, Takayama J, Niimi M, Kan S. Comparative study of thyroidectomies: endoscopic surgery vs conventional open surgery. Surg Endosc. 2002;16(12):1741–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-8830-x.
Zhang P, Zhang HW, Han XD, Di JZ, Zheng Q. Meta-analysis of comparison between minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy and conventional thyroidectomy. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015;19(8):1381–7.
Lee J, Nah KY, Kim RM, Ahn YH, Soh EY, Chung WY. Differences in postoperative outcomes, function, and cosmesis: open versus robotic thyroidectomy. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(12):3186–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1113-z.
Jackson N, Yao L, Tufano RP, Kandil E. Safety of robotic thyroidectomy approaches: meta-analysis and systematic review. Head Neck. 2014;10(1002):137–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.
Choi SH, Baek JH, Lee JH, et al. Initial clinical experience with BRAF V600E mutation analysis of core-needle biopsy specimens from thyroid nodules. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2016;84(4):607–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.12866.
Son SK, Kim JH, Bae JS, Lee SH. Surgical safety and oncologic effectiveness in robotic versus conventional open thyroidectomy in thyroid cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3022–32. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4375-9.
Chung E-J, Park M-W, Cho J-G, et al. A prospective 1-year comparative study of endoscopic thyroidectomy via a retroauricular approach versus conventional open thyroidectomy at a single institution. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(9):3014–21. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4361-7.
Lang BHH, Wong CKH, Tsang JS, Wong KP. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcomes between robotic-assisted thyroidectomy and non-robotic endoscopic thyroidectomy. J Surg Res. 2014;191(2):389–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2014.04.023.
Kiong KL, Iyer NG, Skanthakumar T, et al. Transaxillary thyroidectomies: a comparative learning experience of robotic vs endoscopic thyroidectomies. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;152(5):820–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599815573003.
Lee S, Lee CR, Lee SC, et al. Surgical completeness of robotic thyroidectomy: a prospective comparison with conventional open thyroidectomy in papillary thyroid carcinoma patients. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(4):1068–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3303-y.
Bakkar S, Frustaci G, Papini P, et al. Track recurrence after robotic transaxillary thyroidectomy: a case report highlighting the importance of controlled surgical indications and addressing unprecedented complications. Thyroid. 2016;26(4):559–61. https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2015.0561.
Lee SG, Lee J, Kim MJ, et al. Long-term oncologic outcome of robotic versus open total thyroidectomy in PTC: a case-matched retrospective study. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(8):3474–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4632-9.
Lang BH-H, Wong CKH, Tsang JS, Wong KP, Wan KY. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing surgically-related complications between robotic-assisted thyroidectomy and conventional open thyroidectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(3):850–61. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3406-7.
Ban EJ, Yoo JY, Kim WW, et al. Surgical complications after robotic thyroidectomy for thyroid carcinoma: a single center experience with 3,000 patients. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(9):2555–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3502-1.
Kim SK, Kang SY, Youn HJ, Jung SH. Comparison of conventional thyroidectomy and endoscopic thyroidectomy via axillo-bilateral breast approach in papillary thyroid carcinoma patients. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(8):3419–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4624-9.
Kwon H, Yi JW, Song R-Y, et al. Comparison of bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic thyroidectomy with open thyroidectomy for graves’ disease. World J Surg. 2016;40(3):498–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3403-7.
Abdel Raheem A, Sheikh A, Kim DK, et al. Da Vinci Xi and Si platforms have equivalent perioperative outcomes during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: preliminary experience. J Robot Surg. 2016;11:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-016-0612-x.
Morelli L, Guadagni S, Di Franco G, et al. Use of the new da Vinci Xi® during robotic rectal resection for cancer: a pilot matched-case comparison with the da Vinci Si®. Int J Med Robot. 2016;7(April):375–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1728.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Goh, X., Lim, C.M. (2018). Endoscopic and Robotic Thyroidectomy: An Evidence Approach. In: Parameswaran, R., Agarwal, A. (eds) Evidence-Based Endocrine Surgery. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1124-5_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1124-5_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-1123-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-1124-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)