Abstract
China has stated its intention to more efficiently improve its capability to innovate by reforming its reward and remuneration system for employed inventors. Recently, a new draft Service Invention Regulation (SIR) has been published and is intended to significantly increase the amount of remuneration available to employed inventors in order to increase the level of innovation. The draft SIR follows a system and methodology similar in some aspects to Germany’s principles of defining statutory remuneration rewards. The simplification of the procedure together with fewer possibilities to make deductions will, in effect, lead to employed inventors receiving especially high remuneration. As a result, the SIR may conflict with the interests of existing research-based companies with sizable R&D activities in China. These companies will undoubtedly attempt to legally define and affirm their own remuneration schemes, but potentially face uncertainty concerning the validity of their schemes, and regular disputes with employed inventors could follow. The unpredictability of the requirements for remuneration could become a negative factor for companies contemplating R&D investments in China. It also remains to be seen whether China’s proposed rewards and remuneration incentives will have the desired effect of stimulating innovation by individual employed inventors working outside of the large well established research companies.
Oliver Lutze is Chief Representative, Spruson & Ferguson (Asia), Shanghai, China.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Argy F, Johnson M (2003) Mechanisms for improving the quality of regulations: Australia in an international context. Productivity Commission Staff Working Chapter, July
BDI/BDA (1998) Studie zu den Auswirkungen des Arbeitnehmererfindungsgesetz in der Praxis, Berlin, Germany
Bundestag D (2001) Drucksache 14/…, 14. Wahlperiode, Gesetzentwurf der Bundesregierung, Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Änderung des Gesetzes über Arbeitnehmererfindungen. Downloaded on 8 Sept 2015 from http://www.gesmat.bundesgerichtshof.de/gesetzesmaterialien/15_wp/ArbEG/ArbEG-index.htm
Chang X, Fu K, Low A, Zhang W (2015) Non-executive employee stock options and corporate innovation. J Financ Econ 115(1):168–188
Cosh A, Fu X, Hughes A (2007) Management characteristics, managerial ownership and innovative efficiency in high-technology industry. Oxford University. SLPTMD Working Paper Series No. 007
Franke E (2004) VPP (publisher) Rundbrief 02/2004
Fu X (2015) China’s path to innovation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Fu X, Mu R (2014) Enhancing China’s innovation performance: the policy choices. China World Econ 22:42–60
Global innovation index (2014) The global innovation index: human factor in innovation. Downloaded 2 Sept 2015 from http://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/economics/gii/gii_2014.pdf
Harhoff D, Hoisl K (2007) Institutionalized incentives for ingenuity—patent value and the German Employees’ Inventions Act. Res Policy 36:1143–1162
Hu A (2011) China in 2020: a new type of superpower. The Brookings Institution, Washington
Kamprath R (2012) Patent reversion: an employee-inventor’s second bite at the apple. 11 Chicago-Kent J Intel Prop 186
Kanama D, Nishikawa K (2015) Does an extrinsic reward for R&D employees enhance innovation outcomes? Evidence from a Japanese innovation survey. R&D Management, online pre-publication, 6 Oct, Wiley Online Library. doi:10.1111/radm.12165
Kappos D, Nagasawa K (2014) Japan’s article 35: are employee-inventor monetary award laws impeding Japanese innovation? Jpn AIPPA J 39–46
Leptien C (1995) Incentives for employed inventors: an empirical analysis with special emphasis on the German Law for employee’s inventions. R&D Manag 25(2):213–225
Lerner J, Wulf J (2007) Innovation and incentives: evidence from corporate R&D. Rev Econ Stat 89:634–644
Lutze O (2015) Comparison on employee invention laws and regulations—Germany vs. China. Report for IP Key (publ.). Workshop on inventor remuneration rules at Renmin University. Downloaded 11 Dec 2015 from http://www.ipkey.org/en/activities/upcoming-activities/item/3326-inventor-remuneration-rules-workshop
Meier J, Schubert T, Jaenichen H (2005) Employees’ invention remuneration—money (f)or nothing? Biotechnol Law Report 24:168–175
Merges R (1999) The law and economics of employee inventions. Harvard J Law Technol 13:1–54
Newsletter Beijing East IP Ltd. (2013) Shanghai High People’s Court issued guidance on hearing rewards or remunerations disputes of service invention made by an employee-inventor or designer. Downloaded 7 Sept 2015 from http://www.beijingeastip.com/en/NewsShow.aspx?p=3&id=857dd04f-b11f-4631-a3e0-056f0e98b210&nid=4d67f8af-9dc9-42cd-a63d-2d67ef7d6a33
Newsletter Beijing Sanyou IP Agency Ltd. (2015) From Shanghai Intellectual Property Court on the case of Mr. Liang vs. Shanghai Zhongji Company, Newsletter 201507. Downloaded 14 Sept 2015 from http://www.san-you.com/en/news/NewsZWInfo.asp?NewsID=127&subNewsID=268&mtypeID=8
Onishi K (2013) The effects of compensation plans for employee inventions on R&D productivity: new evidence from Japanese panel data. Res Policy 42:367–378
Onishi K, Owan H (2010) Incentive pay or windfalls: remuneration for employee inventions in Japan. RIETI Discussion Paper Series 10-E-049
Owan H, Nagaoka S (2011) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations of inventors. RIETI Discussion Paper Series 11-E-022
Schnapf D (2004) Japanese statute: bane of employers, special to The National Law Journal. The National Law Journal of Oct 11, 2004. Downloaded 15 Mar 2016 from http://www.nationallawjournal.com/id=900005416288/Japanese-statute-bane-of-employers
Shen L, Dang X (2014) How to reward and remunerate your inventors in China. Managing IP online article 3323120. Downloaded 12 Sept 2015 from http://www.managingip.com/Article/3323120/How-to-reward-and-remunerate-your-inventors-in-China.html
Trimborn (2009) Employees’ inventions in Germany. Carl Heymanns Verlag, Cologne, Germany
WIPO (2015) Telecoms firms lead WIPO international patent filings. WIPO Press Release PR/2015/774. Downloaded 9 Sept 2015 from http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/pressroom/en/documents/pr_2015_774_annexes.pdf#page=1
Yanadori Y, Cui V (2013) Creating incentives for innovation? The relationship between pay dispersion in R&D groups and firm innovation performance. Strateg Manag J 34(12):1502–1511
Yasaki Y, Goto A (2006) Contribution-proportional remuneration rule for employee inventions and its effects on effort and investment incentives. Econ Innov New Technol 15(7):665–678
Acknowledgements
The author wishes to thank the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (OHIM) (now EUIPO), for permission to use materials collected for a ‘Workshop and reports on inventor remuneration rules’ at the Renmin University co-organized with IP Key in Beijing on July 17, 2015, and a related report for this paper. Spruson & Ferguson (Asia) are also thanked for allowing the author the time to conduct research for this chapter during working hours.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lutze, O. (2016). Incentives for Chinese Inventors: A Proposal for a New Inventor Remuneration Scheme with German Elements. In: Prud’homme, D., Song, H. (eds) Economic Impacts of Intellectual Property-Conditioned Government Incentives. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1119-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1119-1_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-1117-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-1119-1
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)