Abstract
Using data drawn from a 2013 field experiment, this chapter examines the energy-saving effects of home energy reports (HERs). HERs provide consumers with energy conservation tips and compare consumers’ energy usage with that of similar neighbors. These comparisons categorized consumers as “energy-using,” “average,” or “energy-saving.” The energy usage comparisons provide social norm information, thereby inducing consumers to conserve energy. In contrast to the HER experiments in the United States that sent the report to households by mail, the staff visited each participating household and explained the HERs in detail during the experiment. The empirical results imply that the effects of HERs depended on electricity contracts. Therefore, HERs contributed to a reduction in electricity usage, in households with all-electric contracts, while the energy-saving effects were not found in households with standard contracts. The electricity-saving effect of HERs on the all-electric households ranged from 4.0–8.7 %, which was found in each category of electricity usage. Overall, there was no indication of so-called “boomerang” effects, which raise electricity usage of households categorized as “energy-saving.” The electricity-saving effect of HERs was found to become larger during the mornings and evenings of weekdays. This effect could persist over several weeks after providing HERs to some groups of households.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allcott H (2011) Social norms and energy conservation. J Public Econ 95:1082–1095
Allcott H (2015) Site selection bias in program evaluation. Quart J Econ 130:1117–1165
Allcott H, Kessler J (2015). The welfare effects of nudges: a case study of energy use social comparisons, NBER Working Paper 21671
Allcott H, Rogers T (2014) The short-run and long-run effects of behavioral interventions: experimental evidence from energy conservation. Am Econ Rev 104(10):3003–3037
Allcott H, Taubinsky D (2015) Evaluating behaviorally motivated policy: experimental evidence from the lightbulb market. Am Econ Rev 105(8):2501–2538
Arimura T, Katayama H, Sakudo M (2013) Do social norms matter to energy saving behavior? Endogenous social and correlated effects, Mimeo
Ayres I, Raseman S, Shih A (2009) Evidence from two large field experiments that peer comparison feedback can reduce residential energy usage, NBER Working Paper 15386
Becker G, Murphy K (1988) A theory of rational addiction. J Polit Econ 96:675–700
Costa D, Kahn M (2013) Energy conservation ‘nudges’ and environmentalist ideology: evidence from a randomized residential electricity field experiment. J Eur Econ Assoc 11(3):680–702
Ferraro P, Price M (2013) Using nonpecuniary strategies to influence behavior: evidence from a large-scale field experiment. Rev Econ Stat 95:64–73
Greene W (2007) LIMDEP version 9.0: econometric modeling guide, Vol. 1, Econometric Software Inc
Houde S, Todd A, Sudarshan A, Flora J, Armel C (2013) Real-time feedback and electricity consumption: a field experiment assessing the potential for savings and persistence. Energ J 34(1):87–102
LaRiviere J, Holladay S, Novgorodsky D, Price M (2014) Prices vs. nudges: a large field experiment on energy efficiency fixed cost investments, Mimeo
Matsukawa I (2011) How does information provision affect residential energy conservation? Evidence from a field experiment. Energ Stud Rev 18(1):1–19
Nolan J, Schultz W, Cialdini R, Goldstein N, Griskevicius V (2008) Normative social influence is underdetected. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 34:913–923
Schultz W, Nolan J, Cialdini R, Goldstein N, Griskevicius V (2007) The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychol Sci 18:429–434
Wolak F (2011) Do residential customers respond to hourly prices? Evidence from a dynamic pricing experiment. Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 101(3):83–87
Wooldridge J (2002) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data, The MIT Press
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: Additional Estimation Results
Appendix: Additional Estimation Results
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Matsukawa, I. (2016). Energy-Saving Effects of Home Energy Reports. In: Consumer Energy Conservation Behavior After Fukushima. SpringerBriefs in Economics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1097-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1097-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-1096-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-1097-2
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)