Abstract
Assessment of student learning in PACE is a difficult and complex endeavor if it is to be done well. The new kinds of learning that result from PACE are not assessed easily or in a straightforward way due largely to the unique practical and pedagogical challenges presented by learning through participation. This chapter explores these challenges, and highlights some of the creative and innovative approaches used by academics. Nonetheless, as discussed in the chapter, there are still open questions about what can and should be assessed. In order to find the most effective methods, It is also necessary that we allow space and support for experimentation by academics.
‘Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted.’
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Billett, S. (2009). Realising the educational worth of integrating work experiences in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 34(7), 827–843.
Boud, D. J., & Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning assessment with long‐term learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 399–413.
Boud, D. J., & Falchikov, N. (2007). Developing assessment for informing judgement. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education (pp. 181–197). London: Routledge.
Cameron, W. B. (1963). Informal sociology: A casual introduction to sociological thinking (Vol.21). New York: Random House.
Coll, R. K., Taylor, N., & Grainger, S. (2002). Assessment of work based learning: Some lessons from the teaching profession. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 3(1), 5–12.
Coll, R. K., Eames, C. W., Paku, L. K., Lay, M. C., Hodges, D., Bhat, R., & Martin, A. (2009). An exploration of the pedagogies employed to integrate knowledge in work-integrated learning. The Journal of Cooperative Education and Internships, 43, 14–35.
Coulson, D., Harvey, M., Mackaway, J., & Winchester-Seeto, T. (2010). Aligning reflection in the cooperative education curriculum. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 11(3), 137–152.
Crisp, B. R., Lister, P. G., & Duton, K. (2005). Integrated assessment, new assessment methods, evaluation of an innovative method of assessment: Critical incident analysis. Scottish Institute for Excellence in Social Work Education. Retrieved from http://www.iriss.org.uk/sites/default/files/sieswe-nam-evaluation-critical-incident-analysis-2005-02.pdf
Davidge-Johnston, N. (2007). Conceptions of curriculum in co-operative education: A framework for analysis of the co-op preparatory curriculum. Unpublished Thesis. Retrieved from http://98.130.74.65/pdf/Nancy%20Johnston%20Thesis.pdf
Dean, B. A., Sykes, C. A., & Clements, M. (2012). Reflective assessment in work-integrated learning: To structure or not to structure, that was our question. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 13(2), 103–113.
Doran, G. T. (1981). There’s a SMART way to write management’s goals and objectives. Management Review, 70(11), 35–36.
Higgs, J. (2014). Assessing the immeasurables of practice. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 15(3), 253–267.
Hodges, D., Smith, B. W., & Jones, P. D. (2004). The assessment of cooperative education. In R. K. Coll & C. Eames (Eds.), International handbook for cooperative education: An international perspective of the theory, research and practice of work-integrated learning (pp. 49–66). Boston: World Association for Cooperative Education.
Kay, J., Russell, L., Winchester-Seeto, T., Rowe, A., & Le Clus, M. (2014). External stakeholders in WIL. In S. Ferns (Ed.), HERDSA guide: Work integrated learning in the curriculum (pp. 59–68). Milperra: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia.
Knight, P. (2007). Fostering and assessing ‘wicked’ competences. Milton Keynes: Open University. Retrieved from http://www.open.ac.uk/cetl-workspace/cetlcontent/documents/460d1d1481d0f.pdf
Mackaway, J. A., Winchester-Seeto, T., Coulson, D., & Harvey, M. (2011). Practical and pedagogical aspects of learning through participation: The LTP assessment design framework. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 8(3), 1–16.
Mackaway, J., Winchester-Seeto, T., & Rowe, A. (2013). Responding to student diversity: Strategies for placing work-integrated education students. In New Zealand Association for Cooperative Education 2013 conference proceedings (pp. 15–18). Hamilton: New Zealand Association for Cooperative Education.
McAllister, L., Whiteford, G., Hill, B., Thomas, N., & Fitzgerald, M. (2006). Reflection in intercultural learning: Examining the international experience through a critical incident approach. Reflective Practice, 7(3), 367–381.
McNamara, J. (2013). The challenge of assessing professional competence in work integrated learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(2), 183–197.
Rowe, A. R., & Winchester-Seeto, T. (2014) Supporting host supervisors in work integrated learning. Higher Education in a Globalised World, HERDSA Conference, July 7–10, 2014.
Smith, C. (2014). Assessment of student outcomes from work-integrated learning: Validity and reliability. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education [Special Issue], 15(3), 209–223.
Steinke, P., & Fitch, P. (2007). Assessing service-learning. Research & Practice in Assessment, 1(2), 1–8.
Tripp, D. (1993). Critical incidents in teaching: Developing professional judgement. London: Routledge.
Whiteford, G., & McAllister, L. (2006). Politics and complexity in intercultural fieldwork: The Vietnam experience. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 1–10.
Winchester-Seeto, T., Mackaway, J., Coulson, D., & Harvey, M. (2010). But how do we assess it?. An analysis of assessment strategies for learning through participation (LTP). Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 11(3), 67–91.
Woolf, H., & Yorke, M. (2010). Guidance for the assessment of work-based learning in foundation degrees. London: Foundation Degree Forward.
Yorke, M. (2011). Work-engaged learning: Towards a paradigm shift in assessment. Quality in Higher Education, 17(1), 117–130.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to acknowledge the generosity of the academics who shared their assessment tools and approaches.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Winchester-Seeto, T., Rowe, A. (2017). Assessment Strategies for New Learning. In: Sachs, J., Clark, L. (eds) Learning Through Community Engagement. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0999-0_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0999-0_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0997-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0999-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)