Skip to main content

History and Overview of Endovascular Stroke Therapy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Acute ischemic stroke is the primary cause of acquired disability in adults and is the second leading cause of death worldwide. Following the introduction of intravenous thrombolysis, endovascular stroke therapy has hugely evolved over the past two decades. Although results of the 2013 randomized trials of endovascular stroke therapy were neutral, they were limited by insufficient imaging screening at enrollment, early-generation devices with less efficacy, and treatment delays. In the year of 2015, there has been great progress in this field with five randomized clinical trials all proving the safety and efficacy of endovascular stroke treatment. Despite some differences in the details of eligibility requirements and processes, all five trials required several key factors for good functional recovery: (1) noninvasive imaging to prove proximal occlusion and to exclude large infarct core and (2) establishing a fast workflow to achieve effective reperfusion. The results indicate that modern thrombectomy devices can achieve faster and more effective reperfusion, so they lead to improved clinical outcomes compared with intravenous thrombolysis alone. There have not been major safety concerns, with a low rate of procedure-related complications and without an increase in symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage or death. Such advances in mechanical thrombectomy techniques hold promise in the global fight against ischemic stroke-related acquired disability and mortality. In this chapter, the recent evolutionary process of endovascular stroke therapy will be discussed in more detail.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Feigin VL, Forouzanfar MH, Krishnamurthi R, Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2010 and the GBD Stroke Experts Group, et al. Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990–2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2014;383:245–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1581–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wardlaw JM, Murray V, Berge E, et al. Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischaemic stroke: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2012;379:2364–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Furlan A, Higashida R, Wechsler L, et al. Intra-arterial prourokinase for acute ischemic stroke. The PROACT II study: a randomized controlled trial. Prolyse in Acute Cerebral Thromboembolism. JAMA. 1999;282:2003–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith WS, Sung G, Starkman S, et al. Safety and efficacy of mechanical embolectomy in acute ischemic stroke: results of the MERCI trial. Stroke. 2005;36:1432–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith WS, Sung G, Saver J, et al. Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: final results of the Multi MERCI trial. Stroke. 2008;39:1205–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Penumbra Pivotal Stroke Trial Investigators. The penumbra pivotal stroke trial: safety and effectiveness of a new generation of mechanical devices for clot removal in intracranial large vessel occlusive disease. Stroke. 2009;40:2761–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Saver JL, Jahan R, Levy EI, et al. Solitaire flow restoration device versus the Merci Retriever in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (SWIFT): a randomised, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2012;380:1241–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nogueira RG, Lutsep HL, Gupta R, et al. Trevo versus Merci retrievers for thrombectomy revascularisation of large vessel occlusions in acute ischaemic stroke (TREVO 2): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2012;380:1231–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Broderick JP, Palesch YY, Demchuk AM, Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) III Investigators, et al. Endovascular therapy after intravenous t-PA versus t-PA alone for stroke. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:893–903.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kidwell CS, Jahan R, Gornbein J, MR RESCUE Investigators, et al. A trial of imaging selection and endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:914–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ciccone A, Valvassori L, Nichelatti M, SYNTHESIS Expansion Investigators, et al. Endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:904–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Qureshi AI, Abd-Allah F, Aleu A, et al. Endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke patients: implications and interpretation of IMS III, MR RESCUE, and SYNTHESIS EXPANSION trials. J Vasc Interv Neurol. 2014;7:56–75.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Berkhemer OA, Fransen PS, Beumer D, MR CLEAN Investigators, et al. A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:11–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Campbell BC, Mitchell PJ, Kleinig TJ, EXTEND-IA Investigators, et al. Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1009–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Goyal M, Demchuk AM, Menon BK, ESCAPE Trial Investigators, et al. Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1019–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Saver JL, Goyal M, Bonafe A, SWIFT PRIME Investigators, et al. Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2285–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jovin TG, Chamorro A, Cobo E, REVASCAT Trial Investigators, et al. Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2296–306.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim D, Ford GA, Kidwell CS, et al. Intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute stroke in patients 80 and older: a comparison of results in patients younger than 80 years. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28:159–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Suzuki S, Kidwell CS, Starkman S, et al. Use of multimodal MRI and novel endovascular therapies in a patient ineligible for intravenous tissue plasminogen activator. Stroke. 2005;36:e77–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hermier M, Nighoghossian N, Derex L, et al. Hypointense transcerebral veins at T2*-weighted MRI: a marker of hemorrhagic transformation risk in patients treated with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2003;23:1362–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wintermark M, Meuli R, Browaeys P, et al. Comparison of CT perfusion and angiography and MRI in selecting stroke patients for acute treatment. Neurology. 2007;68:694–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Noser EA, Shaltoni HM, Hall CE, et al. Aggressive mechanical clot disruption: a safe adjunct to thrombolytic therapy in acute stroke? Stroke. 2005;36:292–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Qureshi AI, Siddiqui AM, Suri MF, et al. Aggressive mechanical clot disruption and low-dose intra-arterial third-generation thrombolytic agent for ischemic stroke: a prospective study. Neurosurgery. 2002;51:1319–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Arnold M, Schroth G, Nedeltchev K, et al. Intra-arterial thrombolysis in 100 patients with acute stroke due to middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke. 2002;33:1828–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Furlan AJ, Abou-Chebl A. The role of recombinant pro-urokinase (r-pro-UK) and intra-arterial thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke: the PROACT trials. Prolyse in acute cerebral thromboembolism. Curr Med Res Opin. 2002;18:s44–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nakano S, Iseda T, Yoneyama T, et al. Direct percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for acute middle cerebral artery trunk occlusion: an alternative option to intra-arterial thrombolysis. Stroke. 2002;33:2872–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mahon BR, Nesbit GM, Barnwell SL, et al. North American clinical experience with the EKOS MicroLysUS infusion catheter for the treatment of embolic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24:534–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. IMS II Trial Investigators. The Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) II study. Stroke. 2007;38:2127–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Berlis A, Lutsep H, Barnwell S, et al. Mechanical thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke with endovascular photoacoustic recanalization. Stroke. 2004;35:1112–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gobin YP, Starkman S, Duckwiler GR, et al. MERCI 1: a phase 1 study of mechanical embolus removal in cerebral ischemia. Stroke. 2004;35:2848–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Menon BK, Hill MD, Eesa M, et al. Initial experience with the Penumbra Stroke System for recanalization of large vessel occlusions in acute ischemic stroke. Neuroradiology. 2011;53:261–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Grunwald IQ, Walter S, Papanagiotou P, et al. Revascularization in acute ischaemic stroke using the penumbra system: the first single center experience. Eur J Neurol. 2009;16:1210–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kulcsár Z, Bonvin C, Pereira VM, et al. Penumbra system: a novel mechanical thrombectomy device for large-vessel occlusions in acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31:628–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Starck EE, McDermott JC, Crummy AB, et al. Percutaneous aspiration thromboembolectomy. Radiology. 1985;156:61–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lutsep HL, Clark WM, Nesbit GM, et al. Intraarterial suction thrombectomy in acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;23:783–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kang DH, Hwang YH, Kim YS, et al. Direct thrombus retrieval using the reperfusion catheter of the penumbra system: forced-suction thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32:283–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Turk AS, Spiotta A, Frei D, et al. Initial clinical experience with the ADAPT technique: a direct aspiration first pass technique for stroke thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg. 2014;6:231–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Castaño C, Serena J, Dávalos A. Use of the new solitaire (TM) AB device for mechanical thrombectomy when Merci clot retriever has failed to remove the clot. A case report. Interv Neuroradiol. 2009;15:209–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Castaño C, Dorado L, Guerrero C, et al. Mechanical thrombectomy with the Solitaire AB device in large artery occlusions of the anterior circulation: a pilot study. Stroke. 2010;41:1836–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Park H, Hwang GJ, Jin SC, et al. A retrieval thrombectomy technique with the Solitaire stent in a large cerebral artery occlusion. Acta Neurochir. 2011;153:1625–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Mendonça N, Flores A, Pagola J, et al. Trevo system: single-center experience with a novel mechanical thrombectomy device. J Neuroimaging. 2013;23:7–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Mendonça N, Flores A, Pagola J, et al. Trevo versus Solitaire a head-to-head comparison between two heavy weights of clot retrieval. J Neuroimaging. 2014;24:167–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. San Román L, Obach V, Blasco J, et al. Single-center experience of cerebral artery thrombectomy using the TREVO device in 60 patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2012;43:1657–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Ebinger M, Winter B, Wendt M, et al. Effect of the use of ambulance-based thrombolysis on time to thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014;311:1622–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dong-Hun Kang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kang, DH. (2017). History and Overview of Endovascular Stroke Therapy. In: Park, J. (eds) Acute Ischemic Stroke. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0965-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0965-5_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0964-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0965-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics