Skip to main content

Facilities Management and Singapore’s Healthcare System

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Service Quality for Facilities Management in Hospitals
  • 1308 Accesses

Abstract

FM discipline’s definition and development history, as well as its service coverage, especially in the healthcare domain are reviewed in this chapter. The healthcare system in Singapore is also introduced here. The literature review identifies eight aspects that are critical to successful hospital FM. However, those aspects are general in nature; it may shed light on how to improve FM service quality by combining them with other service quality tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akhlaghi, F., & Mahony, L. (1997). Service integration and multiskilling in facilities management within the UK National Health Service. Facilities, 15(3/4), 66–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akter, N., & Tränkler, J. (2003). An analysis of possible scenarios of medical waste management in Bangladesh. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 14(2), 242–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, K. (1994). A strategy for facilities management. Facilities, 12(11), 6–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, K. (2003). A strategy for facilities management. Facilities, 21(11/12), 269–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amaratunga, D., & Baldry, D. (2003). A conceptual framework to measure facilities management performance. Property management, 21(2), 171–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkin, B., & Brooks, A. (2009). Total facilities management. Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, E., & Shaw, C. (2005). Buildings. Patient choice. Pick and mix. The Health service journal, 115(5940), 38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandy, N. M. (2002). Setting service standards: A structured approach to delivering outstanding customer service for the facility manager. Journal of Facilities Management, 1(4), 322–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, P., & Baldry, D. (2009). Facilities management: Towards best practice. Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, P. (1996). The secret of a successful FM marriage. Facilities, 14(12/13), 38–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, G., & Beech, N. (1999). Flexible working: Organisational liberation or individual strait-jacket? Facilities, 17(1/2), 18–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caruana, A., & Pitt, L. (1997). INTQUAL-an internal measure of service quality and the link between service quality and business performance. European Journal of Marketing, 31(8), 604–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cesarotti, V., & Di Silvio, B. (2006). Quality management standards for facility services in the Italian health care sector. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 19(6), 451–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chotipanich, S. (2004). Positioning facility management. Facilities, 22(13/14), 364–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, A. (2004). Better late than never. FM world, 18–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotts, D. G., Roper, K. O., & Payant, R. P. (2010). The facility management handbook. Amacom Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drion, B., Melissen, F., & Wood, R. (2012). Facilities management: Lost, or regained? Facilities, 30(5/6), 254–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duyar, I. (2010). Relationship between school facility conditions and the delivery of instruction: Evidence from a national survey of school principals. Journal of Facilities Management, 8(1), 8–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edlin, M. (2009). In Singapore’s health system, there’s no free lunch. Managed Healthcare Executive, 19(7), 8–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, D. (2004). Facilities management: A behavioural approach. Facilities, 22(1/2), 35–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelnay, B. (2002). Facility management and the design of Victoria Public Hospitals. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the CIB Working Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, B. P. (2007). Office productivity: A shift from cost reduction to human contribution. Facilities, 25(11/12), 452–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinks, J., & McNay, P. (1999). The creation of a management-by-variance tool for facilities management performance assessment. Facilities, 17(1/2), 31–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hui, E. C.-M., Zhang, P., & Zheng, X. (2013). Facilities management service and customer satisfaction in shopping mall sector. Facilities, 31(5/6), 1–1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, J. L.-J., Desombre, T., Eves, A., & Kipps, M. (1999). An analysis of catering options within NHS acute hospitals. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 12(7), 293–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, P. A., van der Voordt, T., Choenen, C., von Felten, D., Lindholm, A.-L., Nielsen, S. B., Riratanaphong, C., Schmid, M. (2010). The added value of FM: Different research perspectives.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, P. A., van der Voordt, T., Coenen, C., von Felten, D., Lindholm, A.-L., Nielsen, S. B., & Pfenninger, M. (2012). In search for the added value of FM: What we know and what we need to learn. Facilities, 30(5/6), 199–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kam-Shim, M. W. Y. (1999). Managing change: Facilities management at the Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital. Facilities, 17(3/4), 86–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kincaid, D. G. (1994). Measuring performance in facility management. Facilities, 12(6), 17–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulatunga, U., Liyanage, C., & Amaratunga, D. (2010). Performance measurement and management in facilities management. Facilities, 28(5/6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavy, S., & Fernández-Solis, J. (2010). Complex healthcare facility management and lean construction. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 3(2), 3–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavy, S., & Shohet, I. M. (2009). Integrated healthcare facilities maintenance management model: Case studies. Facilities, 27(3/4), 107–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lennerts, K., Abel, J., Pfründer, U., & Sharma, V. (2005). Step-by-step process analysis for hospital facility management: An insight into the OPIK research project. Facilities, 23(3/4), 164–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, M.-Y., & Fung, I. (2005). Enhancement of classroom facilities of primary schools and its impact on learning behaviors of students. Facilities, 23(13/14), 585–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liyanage, C., & Egbu, C. (2008). A performance management framework for healthcare facilities management. Journal of Facilities Management, 6(1), 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loch, B. (2000). Avoiding the usual suspects. Facilities, 18(10/11/12), 368–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loosemore, M., & Hsin, Y. (2001). Customer-focused benchmarking for facilities management. Facilities, 19(13/14), 464–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massheder, K., & Finch, E. (1998). Benchmarking methodologies applied to UK facilities management. Facilities, 16(3/4), 99–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, D., & Pinder, J. (2008). The impact of facilities management on patient outcomes. Facilities, 26(5/6), 213–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng, X., & Minogue, M. (2011). Performance measurement models in facility management: A comparative study. Facilities, 29(11/12), 472–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L., & May, D. (2006). Patient choice in the NHS: How critical are facilities services in influencing patient choice? Facilities, 24(9/10), 354–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Health. (2012a). Healthcare institution statistics. Retrieved May 14, 2013 from http://www.moh.gov.sg/content/moh_web/home/statistics/healthcare_institutionstatistics.html

  • Ministry of Health. (2012b). Medical directory. Retrieved August 8, 2012 from http://www.moh.gov.sg/content/moh_web/home/medical-directory.html

  • Mudrak, T., van Wagenberg, A., & Wubben, E. (2005). FM as a scientific field of inquiry: Theory, research and practice. Facilities, 23(3/4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Noor, M. N. M., & Pitt, M. (2009). A critical review on innovation in facilities management service delivery. Facilities, 27(5/6), 211–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nutt, B. (1999). Linking FM practice and research. Facilities, 17(1/2), 11–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nutt, B. (2002). The essence and value of facility management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okoroh, M., Gombera, P., John, E., & Wagstaff, M. (2001). Adding value to the healthcare sector—a facilities management partnering arrangement case study. Facilities, 19(3/4), 157–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pathirage, C., Haigh, R., Amaratunga, D., & Baldry, D. (2008). Knowledge management practices in facilities organisations: A case study. Journal of Facilities Management, 6(1), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, T., & Rees, D. (1999). NHS facilities management: A prescription for change. Facilities, 17(7/8), 217–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitt, M., & Tucker, M. (2008). Performance measurement in facilities management: Driving innovation? Property management, 26(4), 241–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, I. (2004). Business critical FM. Facilities, 22(13/14), 353–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pwee, K. H. (2009). Health technology assessment in Singapore. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 25(S1), 234–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, P. A. (2003). Performance matters: How the high performance business unit leverages facilities management effectiveness. Journal of Facilities Management, 2(4), 371–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rondeau, E. P., Brown, R. K., & Lapides, P. D. (1995). Facility management. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarshar, M. (2006). Improving service delivery in FM: Case study of a UK hospital facilities directorate. Journal of Facilities Management, 4(4), 271–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D., & Haynes, B. (2004). An evaluation of customer perception of FM service delivery. Facilities, 22(7/8), 170–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shohet, I. M. (2006). Key performance indicators for strategic healthcare facilities maintenance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(4), 345–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shohet, I. M., & Lavy, S. (2004). Healthcare facilities management: State of the art review. Facilities, 22(7/8), 210–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singapore Department of Statistics. (2012). Population. Retrieved May 14, 2013 from http://www.singstat.gov.sg/index.html

  • Smith, A., Tucker, M., & Pitt, M. (2011). Healthy, productive workplaces: Towards a case for interior plantscaping. Facilities, 29(5/6), 209–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, R., & Hinks, J. (2007). The significance of cognitive dissonance for the “hard and soft FM” paradigm and quality assessment practices: A whole new can of worms? Journal of Facilities Management, 5(4), 243–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, A. V. (2008). Managing a modern hospital. Response Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suess, M. J. (1992). Hospital waste management: An international viewpoint. Environmental Management and Health, 3(3), 6–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tay, L., & Ooi, J. T. (2001). Facilities management: A “Jack of all trades”? Facilities, 19(10), 357–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tranfield, D., & Akhlaghi, F. (1995). Performance measures: Relating facilities to business indicators. Facilities, 13(3), 6–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, M., & Pitt, M. (2009). National standards of customer satisfaction in facilities management. Facilities, 27(13/14), 497–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ventovuori, T., Lehtonen, T., Salonen, A., & Nenonen, S. (2007). A review and classification of academic research in facilities management. Facilities, 25(5/6), 227–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, M. (1999). Performance measurement systems-a case study of customer satisfaction. Facilities, 17(3/4), 97–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wauters, B. (2005). The added value of facilities management: Benchmarking work processes. Facilities, 23(3/4), 142–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (1996). Cost-effective facilities management: A practical approach. Facilities, 14(5/6), 26–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organisation. (2000). The world health report 2000—Health systems: Improving performance. Retrieved May 14, 2013 from http://www.who.int/whr/2000/en/index.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sui Pheng, L., Rui, Z. (2016). Facilities Management and Singapore’s Healthcare System. In: Service Quality for Facilities Management in Hospitals. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0956-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0956-3_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0955-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0956-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics