Abstract
In Global Navigation Satellite Systems, dual-frequency constant envelop modulation scheme includes ACE-BOC, TD-AltBOC, and AltBOC. The three modulation schemes have pros and cons on single item evaluation index such as ranging precision, navigation message demodulation performance, et al., which cause difficulties for the comparison and final chosen. In this article, a method to evaluate the overall performance of navigation signals is proposed. This method takes the minimal signal power that satisfies some positioning precision as the evaluation index, which requires enough precise ranging as well as enough good navigation message demodulation at the same time, thus can reflect the overall performance of the signal in actual using. The overall performance of the three modulation schemes was compared by bed testing under conditions that the signal used the mainstream bit rate and channel encoding method. The bed testing results show that, for 3-D positioning precision better than 10 m, the ACE-BOC need the minimal signal power, 0.5–2.5 dB lower than that for TD-AltBOC and AltBOC, thus the ACE-BOC has the best overall performance of the three schemes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Yao Z, Lu M (2012) Dual-frequency constant envelope multiplex with non-equal power allocation for GNSS. Electron Lett 48(25):1624–1625
Yao Z, Lu M (2013) Design, implementation, and performance analysis of ACE-BOC modulation. In: 26th International technical meeting of the ION satellite division (ION GNSS 2013), Nashville, Tennessee, 16–20 Sept 2013, pp 361–368
Yao Z, Lu M (2013) Constant envelope combination for components on different carrier frequencies with unequal power allocation. In: International technical meeting (ITM) of the Institute of Navigation, San Diego,CA, 28–30 Jan 2013, pp 629–637
Zhang J et al (2014) Applications and low-complex implementations of ACE-BOC multiplexing. In: International technical meeting of the Institute of Navigation, (ITM 2014), San Diego, California, 27–29 Jan 2014, pp 781–791
Yao Z et al (2016) ACE-BOC: dual-frequency constant envelope multiplexing for satellite navigation. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 52(2):1–18
Tang Z et al (2010) TD-AltBOC: a new compass B2 modulation. In: Conference on China Satellite Navigation, Shanghai, China
Lestarquit L et al (2008) AltBOC for dummies or everything you always wanted to know about AltBOC. In: ION GNSS 2008, Savannah, GA, USA, pp 961–970
Zhu Y et al (2014) Comparative analysis of dual-frequency constant envelop multiplexing techniques for ARNS band. In: International technical meeting of the Institute of Navigation, (ITM 2014), San Diego, California, 27–29 Jan 2014, pp 792–801
Betz, J, et al (2006) L1C signal design options. In: National technical meeting of the Institute of Navigation, Monterey, CA, 2006, pp 685–697
Betz JW et al (2006) Description of the L1C signal. In: 19th International technical meeting of the satellite division (ION GNSS 2006), Fort Worth, TX, US, pp 2080–2091
Chen J, Wang M, Qian S (2011) Analysis of modernization GNSS navigation message’s designing. J of Electron & Inform Technol 33(1):211–217
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gao, Y., Li, C., Fu, L., Chu, H. (2016). Overall Performance Comparison of Three Dual-Frequency Constant Envelop Modulation Schemes for GNSS. In: Sun, J., Liu, J., Fan, S., Wang, F. (eds) China Satellite Navigation Conference (CSNC) 2016 Proceedings: Volume II. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 389. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0937-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0937-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0936-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0937-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)