Skip to main content

Overall Performance Comparison of Three Dual-Frequency Constant Envelop Modulation Schemes for GNSS

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
China Satellite Navigation Conference (CSNC) 2016 Proceedings: Volume II

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 389))

Abstract

In Global Navigation Satellite Systems, dual-frequency constant envelop modulation scheme includes ACE-BOC, TD-AltBOC, and AltBOC. The three modulation schemes have pros and cons on single item evaluation index such as ranging precision, navigation message demodulation performance, et al., which cause difficulties for the comparison and final chosen. In this article, a method to evaluate the overall performance of navigation signals is proposed. This method takes the minimal signal power that satisfies some positioning precision as the evaluation index, which requires enough precise ranging as well as enough good navigation message demodulation at the same time, thus can reflect the overall performance of the signal in actual using. The overall performance of the three modulation schemes was compared by bed testing under conditions that the signal used the mainstream bit rate and channel encoding method. The bed testing results show that, for 3-D positioning precision better than 10 m, the ACE-BOC need the minimal signal power, 0.5–2.5 dB lower than that for TD-AltBOC and AltBOC, thus the ACE-BOC has the best overall performance of the three schemes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Yao Z, Lu M (2012) Dual-frequency constant envelope multiplex with non-equal power allocation for GNSS. Electron Lett 48(25):1624–1625

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Yao Z, Lu M (2013) Design, implementation, and performance analysis of ACE-BOC modulation. In: 26th International technical meeting of the ION satellite division (ION GNSS 2013), Nashville, Tennessee, 16–20 Sept 2013, pp 361–368

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yao Z, Lu M (2013) Constant envelope combination for components on different carrier frequencies with unequal power allocation. In: International technical meeting (ITM) of the Institute of Navigation, San Diego,CA, 28–30 Jan 2013, pp 629–637

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang J et al (2014) Applications and low-complex implementations of ACE-BOC multiplexing. In: International technical meeting of the Institute of Navigation, (ITM 2014), San Diego, California, 27–29 Jan 2014, pp 781–791

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yao Z et al (2016) ACE-BOC: dual-frequency constant envelope multiplexing for satellite navigation. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 52(2):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tang Z et al (2010) TD-AltBOC: a new compass B2 modulation. In: Conference on China Satellite Navigation, Shanghai, China

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lestarquit L et al (2008) AltBOC for dummies or everything you always wanted to know about AltBOC. In: ION GNSS 2008, Savannah, GA, USA, pp 961–970

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhu Y et al (2014) Comparative analysis of dual-frequency constant envelop multiplexing techniques for ARNS band. In: International technical meeting of the Institute of Navigation, (ITM 2014), San Diego, California, 27–29 Jan 2014, pp 792–801

    Google Scholar 

  9. Betz, J, et al (2006) L1C signal design options. In: National technical meeting of the Institute of Navigation, Monterey, CA, 2006, pp 685–697

    Google Scholar 

  10. Betz JW et al (2006) Description of the L1C signal. In: 19th International technical meeting of the satellite division (ION GNSS 2006), Fort Worth, TX, US, pp 2080–2091

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chen J, Wang M, Qian S (2011) Analysis of modernization GNSS navigation message’s designing. J of Electron & Inform Technol 33(1):211–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yang Gao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gao, Y., Li, C., Fu, L., Chu, H. (2016). Overall Performance Comparison of Three Dual-Frequency Constant Envelop Modulation Schemes for GNSS. In: Sun, J., Liu, J., Fan, S., Wang, F. (eds) China Satellite Navigation Conference (CSNC) 2016 Proceedings: Volume II. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 389. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0937-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0937-2_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0936-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0937-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics