Advertisement

Corporate Social Responsibility Around the World—An Overview of Theoretical Framework, and Evolution

Chapter
Part of the CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance book series (CSEG)

Abstract

The objective of this chapter is to highlight the evolution of the concept of the corporate social responsibility around the world. Specifically, we focus on theoretical framework underpinning the corporate social responsibility. We also review various definitions highlighting some of the most widely used definitions which are exhaustive in nature. We conclude the chapter by providing a summary of various surveys conducted across the world by various agencies to understand the nature of CSR spending from differing perspectives of employees, consumers and management.

Keywords

Corporate Social Responsibility Business Ethic Social Responsibility Stakeholder Theory Corporate Social Performance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ackerman RW (1973) How companies respond to social demands. Harvard Bus Rev 51(4):88–98Google Scholar
  2. Ackerman RW, Bauer RA (1976) Corporate social responsiveness. Reston, Reston, VAGoogle Scholar
  3. Agle BR, Mitchell RK, Sonnenfeld JA (1999) Who Matters To CEOs? An Investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience, Corporate Performance and CEO Values. Acad Manage J 42(5):507–525Google Scholar
  4. Alford H, Naughton M (2002) Beyond the shareholder model of the firm: working toward the common good of a business. In: Cortright SA, Naughton MJ (eds) Rethinking the purpose of business, University of Notre Dame Press, IN: Notre Dame, pp 27–47Google Scholar
  5. Aras G, Crowther D (2009) The durable corporation: strategies for sustainable development (Gower Publishing Ltd)Google Scholar
  6. Aupperle KE, Carroll AB, Hatfield JD (1985) An empirical investigation of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Acad Manage J 28:446–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhattacharya CB, Sen S (2004) Doing better at doing good: when, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. Calif Manage Rev 47(1):9–24Google Scholar
  8. Bowen HR (1953) Social responsibilities of the businessman. Harper & Brothers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Brammer S, Millington A, Rayton B (2007) The Contribution of corporate social responsibility to organisational commitment. Int J Hum Resource Manage 18(10):1701–1719Google Scholar
  10. Brown JA, Forster WR (2013) CSR and stakeholder theory: a tale of Adam Smith. J Bus Ethics 112(2):301–312Google Scholar
  11. Carroll AB (1979) A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Acad Manage Rev 4:497–505Google Scholar
  12. Carroll A (1991) The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Bus Horiz 34:39–48Google Scholar
  13. Carroll AB (1999a) Corporate social responsibility evolution of a definitional construct. Bus Soc 38(3):268–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carroll AB (1999b) Corporate social responsibility: evolution of a definitional construct. Bus Soc 38(3):268–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carroll A (2006) Corporate social responsibility: a historical perspective. In: Epstein MJ, Hanson KO (eds) The accountable corporation, vol 3. Praeger Publishers, Westport, pp 3–30. Buchholtz, 2006. Business and society: ethics and stakeholder management, 6th edn. South-Western College Publishing/International Thompson Publishing, CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  16. Clark JM (1939) Social control of business. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Claydon J (2011) A new direction for CSR: the shortcomings of previous CSR models and the rationale for a new model. Soc Responsib J 7(3):405–420Google Scholar
  18. Cochran PL, Wood RA (1984) Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Acad Manage J 27(1):42–56Google Scholar
  19. Davis K (1960) Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities? Calif Manage Rev II:70–76Google Scholar
  20. Davis JH, Schoorman FD, Donaldson L (1997) Toward a stewardship theory of management. Acad Manage Rev 22(1): 20–47Google Scholar
  21. Donaldson T, Preston LE (1995) The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of management review 20(1):71Google Scholar
  22. Driver M (2006) Beyond the stalemate of economics versus ethics: corporate social responsibility and the discourse of the organizational self. J Bus Ethics 66:337–356Google Scholar
  23. Dunphy D, Griffiths A, Benn S (2003) Organizational change for corporate sustainability. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Eilbert H, Parket IR (1973) The current status of corporate social responsibility. Bus Horiz 16:5–14Google Scholar
  25. Elkington J (1998) Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business (New Society Publishers)Google Scholar
  26. Epstein EM (1987) The corporate social policy process: beyond business ethics, corporate social responsibility, and corporate social responsiveness. Calif Manage Rev 29:99–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Evan WM, Freeman RE (1988) A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: kantian capitalism. In: Beauchamp TL, Bowie NE (eds) Ethical theory and business, 3rd edition (Englewood Cliffs). pp 97–106Google Scholar
  28. Frederick WC (1960) The growing concern over business responsibility. Calif Manage Rev 2:54–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Frederick WC (2006) Corporation be good: the story of corporate social responsibility. Dog Ear Publishing, IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
  30. Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman, BostonGoogle Scholar
  31. Freeman RE (1994) The politics of stakeholder theory: some future directions. Business ethics quarterly 4:409–421Google Scholar
  32. Freeman RE, Phillips RA (2002) Stakeholder theory: a libertarian defense. Business ethics quarterly 12(3):331–350Google Scholar
  33. Freeman RE, Velamuri SR (2005): A new approach to CSR: company stakeholder responsibility. In: Kakabadse A, Morsing M (eds) Corporate Responsibility, Palgrave Macmillan, UKGoogle Scholar
  34. Friedman M (1962) Capitalism and freedom. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  35. Friedman M (1970) The social responsibility of business is to increase profits. N Y Times Mag 32–33, 122–126, Sept 2013Google Scholar
  36. Garriga E, Mele D (2004) Corporate social responsibility theories: mapping and territory. J Bus Ethics 53:51–74Google Scholar
  37. Gechev R (2005). Sustainable development. Economic aspect, University PressGoogle Scholar
  38. Gholami S (2011) Value creation model through corporate social responsibility (CSR). Int J Bus Manag 6(9)Google Scholar
  39. Gladwin TN, Kennelly JJ, Tara-Shelomith K (1995) Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: implications for management theory and research. Acad Manage Rev 20(4):874–907Google Scholar
  40. Gond J-P, Moon J (2011) Corporate social responsibility in retrospect and prospect: exploring the life-cycle of an essentially contested concept, No. 59-2011 ICCSR research paper series—Routledge major work on corporate social responsibilityGoogle Scholar
  41. Greenfield WM (2004) In the name of corporate social responsibility. Bus Horizons 47(1):19–28Google Scholar
  42. Griffin JJ (2000) Corporate social performance: research directions for the 21st century. Bus Soc 39(4):479–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Griffin JJ, Mahon JF (1997) The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: twenty-five years of incomparable research. Bus Soc 36:5–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Habisch A, Jonker J, Wegner M, Schmidpeter R (eds) (2005) Corporate social responsibility across Europe. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  45. Hawken P (1993) The ecology of commerce. Weidenfeld & Nicholson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  46. Hay R, Gray E (1974) Social responsibilities of business managers. Acad Manage J 17:1Google Scholar
  47. Husted BW (2000) A contingency theory of corporate social performance. Bus Soc 39(1):24–48Google Scholar
  48. Jacoby J, Olson JC, Haddock RA (1971) Price, Brand Name, and Product Composition Characteristics as Determinants of Perceived Quality. J Appl Psychol 55:570–579Google Scholar
  49. Johnson HL (1971) Business in contemporary society: framework and issues. Wadsworth Publishing Co., Inc., BelmontGoogle Scholar
  50. Jones TM (1980) Corporate social responsibility revisited, redefined. Calif Manage Rev 59–67 (Spring)Google Scholar
  51. Jones R, Murrell AJ (2001) Signaling positive corporate social performance: an event study of family-friendly firms. Bus Soc 40(1):59–78Google Scholar
  52. Kaku R (1997) The path of kyosei’. Harvard Bus Rev 75(4):55–62Google Scholar
  53. Kotler P, Lee N (2005) Corporate social responsibility: doing the most good for your company and your cause. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  54. Lichtenstein DR, Drumwright ME, Braig BM (2004) The effect of corporate social responsibility on customer donations to corporate-supported nonprofits. J Marketing 68(10):16–33Google Scholar
  55. Luo X, Bhattacharya CB (2006) Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and marketvalue, J Marketing 70(4): 1–18Google Scholar
  56. Lydenberg SD (2005) Corporations and the public interest: guiding the invisible hand. Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc., San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  57. Maignan I, Ralston D (2002) Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: insights from businesses’ self-presentations. J Int Bus Stud 33(3):497–514Google Scholar
  58. Maples AD (2005) Sustainable development. New Appl Sci J 27:1083–1086Google Scholar
  59. March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations. New-York: John Wiley and sonsGoogle Scholar
  60. McWilliams A, Siegel DS, Wright PM (2006) Corporate social responsibility: strategic implications. J Manage Stud 43(1):1–18Google Scholar
  61. Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood DJ (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad Manage Rev 22(4):853–886Google Scholar
  62. Mohan A (2003) Strategies for the management of complex practices in complex organizations: a study of the transnational management of corporate responsibility. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Warwick, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  63. Moon, J. (2004). CSR in the UK: an explicit model of business – society relations. In: Habisch A, Jonker J, Wegner M, Schmidpeter R (eds) CSR across Europe. Springer, Berlin, pp 51–65Google Scholar
  64. Muirhead SA (1999) Corporate contributions: the view from 50 years. The Conference Board, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  65. Murphy PE (1978) An evolution: corporate social responsiveness. Univ Mich Bus RevGoogle Scholar
  66. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2001) Corporate responsibility: private initiatives and public goals. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  67. Parket IR, Eilbirt H (1975) Social responsibility: the underlying factors. Bus Horiz XVIII:5–10Google Scholar
  68. Pearce JA, Doh JP (2005) High-impact collaborative social initiatives. MIT Sloan Manage Rev 46(3):30–39Google Scholar
  69. Pedersen ER (2010) Modelling CSR: how managers understand the responsibilities of business towards society. J Bus Ethics 91(2):155–166Google Scholar
  70. Perrini F (2005) Book review of corporate social responsibility: doing the most good for your company and your cause. Acad Manage Perspect 90–93 (May)Google Scholar
  71. Phillips RA, Freeman RE, Wicks AC (2003) What stakeholder theory is not. Bus ethics quart 13(4):479–502Google Scholar
  72. Preston LE, Post JE (1975) Private management and public policy: the principle of public responsibility. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  73. Preston LE, Post JE (1981) Private management and public policy. In: california management review. 23(3):56–63Google Scholar
  74. Rowley TJ (1997) Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Acad Manage Rev 22:887–910Google Scholar
  75. Schwartz MS, Carroll AB (2003) Corporate social responsibility: a three domain approach. Bus Ethics Q 13(4):503–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sen S, Bhattacharya CB (2001) Does doing good always lead to doing better? consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. J Mark Res 38(5):43–62Google Scholar
  77. Sethi SP (1975) Dimensions of corporate social performance: an analytic framework. Calif Manage Rev 17:58–64 (Spring)Google Scholar
  78. Shapiro C (1983) Premium for high quality products as returns to reputations. Quart J Econ 98(4):659–679Google Scholar
  79. Stormer F (2003) Making the shift: moving from “ethics pays” to an inter-systems model of business. J Bus Ethics 44(4):279–288Google Scholar
  80. Swanson DL (1995) Addressing a theoretical problem by reorienting the corporate social performance model. Acad Manage Rev 20:43–64Google Scholar
  81. Tuzzolino F, Armandi BR (1981) A Need-hierarchy framework for assessing corporate social responsibility. Acad Manage Rev 6:21–28Google Scholar
  82. Visser W (2010a) CSR 2.0: From the age of greed to the age of responsibility. In: Sun W et al (eds) Reframing corporate social responsibility, Lessons from the global financial crisis, Emerald, BingleyGoogle Scholar
  83. Visser W (2010b) The age of responsibility: CSR 2.0 and the new DNA of business. J Bus Systems, Govern Ethics 5(2):7–22Google Scholar
  84. Vogel DJ (2005) Is there a market for virtue? the business case for corporate social responsibility. Cal manage rev 47(4):19–45Google Scholar
  85. Waddock SA, Graves SB (1997) The corporate social performance–financial performance link. Strat Mgmt J 18: 303–319Google Scholar
  86. Walton CC (1967) Corporate social responsibilities. Belmont, CA: WadsworthGoogle Scholar
  87. Wartick SL, Cochran PL (1985) The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Acad Manage Rev 10:758–769Google Scholar
  88. Wartick SL, Mahon JF (1994) Toward a substantive definition of the corporate issue construct a review and synthesis of the literature. Bus Soc 33(3):293–311Google Scholar
  89. Wood DJ (1991) Corporate social performance revisited. Acad Manage Rev 16:691–718Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Madras School of EconomicsChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations