Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Field Trips in the Teaching and Learning of Biosciences

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Assessment for Learning Within and Beyond the Classroom

Abstract

Field trips can be defined as a type of experiential learning that gets students out of the traditional classroom setting into a new mode of learning. It is advocated that field trips are one of the most important things educators can provide for their students as they not only expand students’ learning and experiences, but also increase students’ knowledge and understanding of the world in which they live. Despite ample evidence shown through research on the effectiveness of field trips which emphasizes on hands-on, real life, and practical applications of learning, the dilemma that is faced by educators lies in providing proof of student learning for the current trend in education tends to emphasize mainly on assessments. Therefore, the objectives of this study are, firstly, to evaluate the effectiveness of field trips as an educational tool to enhance student’s understanding of the subject taught and, secondly, to show whether report writing can be used as an assessment tool to evaluate the learning that takes place via field trips. Students pursuing an undergraduate degree program in biomedical science were used as the sample where they have participated in field trips which were then assessed via report writing. The results were analyzed using SPSS and the outcome indicated that there is an increased understanding of the subject among the students. The high percentage of scores in the report-writing task confirmed this finding. This was supported by a survey administered to the same sample which showed that students have a positive perception on the impact of the field trips on their understanding of the subject. The paper ends with recommendation for the incorporation of field trips in the curriculum to stimulate better understanding and increase motivation towards the learning of science. It is further advocated that report writing can be used as an effective assessment tool to evaluate this increased understanding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Association for Experiential Education (AEE). (2012). What is experiential education? Retrieved April 14, 2015, from http://www.aee.org/about/whatIsEE

  • Behrendt, M., & Franklin, T. (2014). A review of research on school field trips and their value in education. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 9(3), 235–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broad, B. (2003). What we really value: Beyond rubrics in teaching and assessing writing. All USU Press Publications. Book 140. http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/usupress_pubs/140

  • Feller, I., & Stern, P. C. (2007). A strategy for assessing science. Behavioral and social research on aging. Washington: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, G. (1992). Assessing more students. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornby, W., & Laing, D. (2003). Assessment survey report no 1: Efficiency and effectiveness in assessment. Retrieved from https://www4.rgu.ac.uk/files/EFFICIENCY%20AND%20EFFECTIVENESS%20IN%20ASSESSMENT.pdf

  • Hudak, P. (2003). Campus field exercises for introductory geoscience courses. Journal of Geography, 102(5), 220–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutson, T., Cooper, S., & Talbert, T. (2011). Describing connections between science content and future careers: Implementing texas curriculum for rural at risk high school students using purposefully-designed field trip. Rural Educator, 31, 37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kisiel, J. (2006). More than lions and tigers and bears-creating meaningful field trip lessons. Science Activities, 43(2), 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, D. (2002). Memorable experiences of a science field trip. School Science and Mathematics, 100(2), 65–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. (1983). Experiential learning, experiences as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krepel, W. J., & Duvall, C. R. (1981). Field trips: A guideline for planning and conducting educational experiences. Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Marca, N. (2011). The Likert scales: Advantages and disadvantages. Retrieved January 07, 2015 from Field research in organizational psychology. https://wordpress.com/2011/12/05/the-likert-scale-advantages-and-disadvantages/

  • Lei, S. A. (2010a). Assessment practices of advanced field ecology courses. Education, 130(3), 404–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lei, S. A. (2010b). Field trips in college biology and ecology courses: Revisiting benefits and drawbacks. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 37(1), 42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S., & Seevers, R. (2003). A field trip planning guide from early childhood classes. Preventing School Failure, 47(4), 111–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mawdsley, R. D. (1999). Legal issues involving fieldtrips. School Business Affairs, 65(9), 28–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, G. D., Utgard, R. O., & Lisowski, M. (1986, September/October). The importance of field trips as a geological example. Journal of College Science Teaching, 17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michie, M. (1998). Factors influencing secondary science teachers to organise and conduct field trips. Australian Science Teacher’s Journal, 44, 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirka, G. D. (1970). Factors which influence elementary teachers’ use of out-of-doors. Columbus: The Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery County Public Schools. (2006). http://www.mcps.k12.md.us. Accessed June 22, 2015.

  • Nabors, M. L., Edwards, L. C., & Murray, R. K. (2009). Making the case for field trips: What research tells us and what site coordinators have to say. Education, 129(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadelson, L., & Jordan, J. (2012). Student attitudes toward and recall of outside day: An environmental science field trip. Journal of Educational Research, 105(3), 220–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prokop, P., Tuncer, G., & Kvasnicak, R. (2007). Short-term effects of field programme on students’ knowledge and attitude toward biology: A Slovak experience. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennie, L. J. (2007). Learning outside of school. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education. Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarce, R. (1997). Field trips as short term experiential education. Teaching Sociology, 25, 219–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scribner-MacLean, M., & Kennedy, L. (2007). More than just a day away from school: Planning a great science field trip. Science Scope, 30(5), 57–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tal, T., & Morag, O. (2009). Reflective practice as a means for preparing to teach outdoors in an ecological garden. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20(3), 245–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Touhidur, R., & Spafford, H. (2009). Value of field trips for student learning in the biological sciences. Teaching and Learning Forum 2009. http://ctl.curtin.edu.au/events/conferences/tlf/tlf2009/refereed/rahman.html. Accessed 22 June 2015.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Taylor’s University, Subang Jaya, Malaysia

    Malarvili Ramachandiran

  2. University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    Saroja Dhanapal

Authors
  1. Malarvili Ramachandiran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Saroja Dhanapal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Malarvili Ramachandiran .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Taylor’s University, Subang Jaya, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia

    Siew Fun Tang

  2. Taylor’s University, Subang Jaya, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia

    Loshinikarasi Logonnathan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ramachandiran, M., Dhanapal, S. (2016). Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Field Trips in the Teaching and Learning of Biosciences. In: Tang, S., Logonnathan, L. (eds) Assessment for Learning Within and Beyond the Classroom. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0908-2_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0908-2_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0906-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0908-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation