Skip to main content

Of Ships and Shipping: The Maritime Archaeology of Fifteenth Century CE Southeast Asia

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Early Navigation in the Asia-Pacific Region

Abstract

The fifteenth century plays an important part in the history of the Southeast Asian region particularly as a transitional period between the demise of the “Classical Age” in Southeast Asia during thirteenth and fourteenth centuries and the advent of the Europeans starting in the sixteenth century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is according to Indonesian archaeologists who were interviewed during the recent International Capacity Building on Underwater Cultural Heritage workshop in Makassar, South Sulawesi in Indonesia on October 7–15, 2013.

  2. 2.

    Hall (2004: 51) summarized a comprehensive list of the variety of trade items based on some historical documents: “India-based ships arrived regularly from the Gujarat, Malabar, and Coromandel coasts, as well as from Bengal, and Myanmar. Goods included luxury items from the Middle East, such as rosewater, incense, opium, and carpets, as well as seeds and grains. But the bulk of the fifteenth-century cargoes were made up of cotton cloth from the Gujarat and Coromandel coasts. Vessels from Bengal brought foodstuffs, rice, cane sugar, dried and salted meat and fish, preserved vegetables and candied fruits, as well as the local white cloth fabrics. Malabar merchants from India’s southwest coast brought pepper and Middle Eastern goods. The Bago (Pegu) polity in lower Myanmar also supplied foodstuffs, rice and sugar, and ships. In return, spices, gold, camphor, tin, sandalwood, alum, and pearls were sent from Melaka. Re-exports from China included porcelain, musk, silk, quicksilver, copper, and vermillion. Malabar and Sumatran pepper was carried back to Bengal, with some opium from Middle Eastern countries”.

  3. 3.

    “Moors from Cairo, Mecca, Aden, Abyssinians, men of Kilwa, Malindi, Ormuz, Parsees, Rumes, Turks, Turkomans, Christian Armenians, Gujaratees, men of Chaul, Dabhol, Goa, of the kingdom of Deccan, Malabars and Klings, merchants from Orissa, Ceylon, Bengal, Arakan, Pegu, Siamese, men of Kedah, Malays, men of Pahang, Patani, Cambodia, Champa, Cochin China, Chinese, Lequeos, men of Brunei, Luções, men of Tamjompura, Laue, Banka, Linga (they have a thousand other islands), Moluccas, Banda, Bima, Timor, Madura, Java, Sunda, Palembang, Jambi, Tongkal, Indragiri, Kappata, Menangkabau, Siak, Arqua (Arcat?), Aru, Bata, country of the Tomjano, Pase, Pedir, Maldives”.

  4. 4.

    Andaya and Andaya (2001) surmised that the sultan’s command over the Orang Lauts, or the sea people was important as the Orang Lauts provided protection for trading ships destined for Melaka and harassed ships en route to rival ports. The strategy is sound, as most of the Orang Lauts have possibly engaged in ‘piratical’ activities in the Melaka Straits before the fifteenth century. Melaka was reportedly a pirate haven with a marketplace that sold spoils from shipping plunder when Parameśwara arrived. Merchants understandably go to ports where assurance of a safe passage is given.

  5. 5.

    China first took notice of Melaka in 1403 from the reports of Indian Muslim merchants and sent an envoy to visit the polity the next year (Groeneveldt 1877; Andaya and Andaya 2001). Recognising its advantages, Parameśwara immediately placed Melaka under China’s sovereignty as a vassal state (Taylor 1992). Tribute-bearing missions to China commenced in 1405 and then again in 1407, 1408, 1413, and 1416 and thereafter about once every one or two years (Wake 1964). Melakan rulers even visited China in 1411, 1414, 1419 and 1424 (Coedès 1968). The Zheng He voyages further set the platform for Melaka’s later achievement as it cleared the Melaka Straits of pirates who have been preying on merchant shipping for centuries and conducted naval patrols in the first two decades of the fifteenth century (Taylor 1992; Chenoweth 1996–1998).

  6. 6.

    Diplomatic documents, merchant lists and travellers accounts provides an idea of the various items exchanged: animal skins (cow and buffalo hides and deerskins), stingray skins, dried fish, wood (sapanwood, eagle wood, ironwood and teak timbers) ivory, horn, wax, benzoin (gum benjamin), gumlac, namrack, metals (lead and tin) (Pombejra 2005). The Pires accounts also listed the following Siam-Melaka exchanged merchandise: rice, dried salted fish, arak, vegetables, lac, benzoin, brazil, lead, tin, silver, gold ivory, cassia fistula, copper and gold vessels, ruby, diamond ring and cloth (Baker 2003). In addition, Ayutthaya sent tribute items to China that included elephants, turtles, aromatics and exotics, textiles and slaves in exchange for Chinese luxury fabrics, porcelain, medicine and currency.

  7. 7.

    The Southeast Asia–Indian Ocean maritime trading network is also a significant subject. Melaka, as the foremost trading centre of the period, housed a substantial population of people with different ethnicities. Among these are the chatis, a group of merchants from the Indian Ocean states according to Ma Huan’s description (Mills 1970). These merchants represent the vibrant maritime trade relationship between the Bay of Bengal and the Melaka straits in the fifteenth century. Besides Melaka, Wade (2010) notes that the chatis resides and operates also in port cities such as Pegu, Ava, Tenasserim, Bantam and the Moluccas. Some of the traders even occupy important political positions such as the case of Tamil merchant TunMutahir who became Bendahara with the title Bendahara Seri Maharaja (Wade 2010). In the realm of maritime economy, their participation is mostly confined to trading activities with major Southeast Asian port cities as a collection and transit point for trade goods to be transported back to the Indian Ocean sphere. There are however, a number of publications that emphasize the significant role and influence of the Indian Ocean traders in matters of politics, religion, economy and culture but are currently outside of the purview of this chapter.

  8. 8.

    Ming Gap is used by archaeologists and ceramic specialists to explain the general absence of Chinese blue and white porcelain in the region and also the coincidental rise of exported ceramic wares from other ceramic-producing Southeast Asian countries such as Thailand, Vietnam and Burma (present day Myanmar).

References

  • Andaya, B. W., & Andaya, L. Y. (2001). A history of Malaysia. USA: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, C. (2003). Ayutthaya rising: From land or sea? Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 34(01), 41–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barretto-Tesoro, G. (2008). Identity and reciprocity in 15th century Philippines. Oxford: John and Erica Hedges Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beek, S. V., & Tettoni, L. I. (1991). The arts of Thailand. London: Thames and Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. M. (1979). The South-East Asian Wares. In South-East Asian and Chinese Trade Pottery. An exhibition catalogue. Presented on the Oriental Ceramic Society of Hong Kong and the Urban Council, Hong Kong. Jan. 26–April 2, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. M. (2004). The Ming Gap and shipwreck: Ceramics in Southeast Asia (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. M. (2009). The ming gap and shipwreck ceramics in Southeast Asia: Towards a chronology of Thai trade ware. Thailand: Siam Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., & Sjostrand S. (2002). Maritime archaeology and shipwreck ceramics in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Department of Museums and Antiquities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chenoweth, G. M. (1996–1998). Melaka, “Piracy” and the modern world system. Journal of Law and Religion, 13(1), 107–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chirapravati, M. L. P. (2005). WatRatchaburana: Deposits of history, art, and culture of the early Ayutthaya period. In The Kingdom of Siam: The art of Central Thailand, 1350–1800. A Joint Project of Snoeck Publishers. San Francisco: Buppha Press, Art Media Resources, Inc., and the Asian Art Museum of San Francisco—Chong-Moon Lee Center for Asian Art and Culture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coedès, G. (1968). The Indianized States of South-East Asia. Oxford: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conese, E. (1997). Lena shoal underwater archaeological project, Northern Palawan. Manila: National Museum manuscript report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortesao, A. & Rodrigues, F. (1944). The suma oriental of Tome Pires (Vol. 2, pp. 1–6). London: Hakluyt Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, M. H., Hodell, D., Brenner, M., Chapman, H. J., Curtis, J. H., Kenney, W. F., et al. (2012). Paleo-enviromental history of the West Baray, Angkor (Cambodia). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(4), 1046–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diem, A. (1996). Relics of a lost kingdom: Ceramics from the Asian maritime trade. In Christophe Loviny (Ed.), The pearl road, tales of treasure ships in the Philippines (pp. 94–105). Christophe Loviny: Makati City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diem, A. (1997). The Pandanan Wreck 1414: Centuries of regional interchange. Oriental Art, 43(2), 45–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diem, A. (1999). Ceramics from Vijaya, Central Vietnam: Internal motivations and external influences (14th–late 15th Century). Oriental Art, 45(3), 55–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diem, A. (2001). Vietnamese ceramics from the Pandanan shipwreck excavation in the Philippines, Taoci: Revue Annuelle de la SocieteFrancaised’ Etude de la Ceramique Orientale (No. 2 (December), pp. 87–93).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dizon, E. (1996). Anatomy of a shipwreck: Archaeology of the 15th-Century Pandanan Shipwreck. In C. Loviny (Ed.), The pearl road, tales of treasure ships in the Philippines. Makati City: Christophe Loviny (pp. 62–75).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dizon, E. (1998). Underwater Archaeology of the Pandanan Wreck: A mid-15th century AD vessel, Southern Palawan, Philippines. Paper presented to Seventh International Conference of the European Association of Southeast Asian Archaeologists, Berlin, 31 August–4 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumarçay, J., & Smithies, M. (1995). Cultural sites of Burma, Thailand, and Cambodia. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupoizat, M-F. (2001). Stoneware Jars in Asian Maritime Commerce, Domestic and Ritual Functions. In The Sunken Treasures of Brunei Darussalam: Scientific Study. Textuel: Paris (pp. 85–128).

    Google Scholar 

  • Flecker, M. (2003). The thirteenth-century Java Sea Wreck: a Chinese cargo in an Indonesian ship. The Mariner’s Mirror, 89(4), 388–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flecker, M. (2005). The advent of Chinese sea-going shipping: A look at the shipwreck evidence. Proceedings of the International Conference: Chinese Export Ceramics and Maritime Trade, l2th–15th Centuries. Hong Kong: Chinese Civilisation Center, City University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flecker, M. (2009). Maritime archaeology in Southeast Asia. In J. N. Miksic (Ed.), Southeast Asian ceramics: new light on old pottery. Editions Didier Millet: Southeast Asian Ceramics Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, R., Penny, D., Evans, D., Pottier, C., Barbetti, M., Kummu, M., et al. (2008). The water management network of Angkor, Cambodia. Antiquity, 82(317), 658–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, R. (1959). The Calatagan excavations: Two 15th century burial sites in Batangas, Philippines. Philippine Studies (Vol. 7, no. 3). Manila, Philippines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover, I., & Bellwood, P. S. (Eds.). (2004). Southeast Asia: From prehistory to history. London/New York: RoutledgeCurzon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddio, F. (2002). Lost at sea: The strange route of the lena shoal junk. London: Periplus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, J., & Harper, R. (1987). The maritime archaeology of shipwrecks and ceramics in Southeast Asia. Australian Institute for Maritime Archaeology Special Publication, 4, 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, T. (1961). Thailand in the light of official Chinese historiography, A Chapter in the Ming Dynasty. Journal of the Siam Society 49(1), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groeneveldt, W. P. (1877). Notes on the Malay archipelago and Malacca compiled from Chinese sources, Bruining.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillon, E. (2001). Cham art: Treasures from the Da Nang Museum, Vietnam. London: Thames and Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guy, J. (1986). Oriental Trade Ceramics in South-East Asia, Ninth to Sixteenth Centuries. Singapore: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, K. R. (1992). Economic history of early Southeast Asia. The Cambridge History of Southeast Asia, 1 (Part 1) (pp. 183–275).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, K. R. (2004). Local and international trade and traders in the straits of Melaka region: 600–1500. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, 47(2), 213–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, K. R. (2011). A history of early Southeast Asia: Maritime trade and societal development, 100–1500. USA: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrickson, M. (2011). A transport geographic perspective on travel and communication in Angkorian Southeast Asia (ninth to fifteenth centuries ad). World Archaeology, 43(3), 444–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higham, C. (1989). The archaeology of mainland Southeast: From 10,000 B.C. to the fall of Angkor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higham, C. (1996). The Bronze Age of Southeast Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higham, C. (2004). The Civilization of Angkor. Phoenix: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intakosi, V. (1983). Rang Kwien and Samed Ngam shipwrecks discovered in the Gulf of Thailand. SPAFA Digest (Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 3–34).

    Google Scholar 

  • Katseri, C. (1976). The Rise of Ayudhya: A history of Siam in the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katseri, C. (1991). Ayudhya: Capital-port of Siam and its “Chinese Connection” in the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. A paper presented at a seminar on “Harbour Cities Along the Silk Roads,” 10–11 January 1991, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia, Centre for Social and Cultural Studies, Indonesia Institute of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, P. Y. K. (2002). Maritime Trade in China During the Middle Ming Period Circa 1500 AD. In Lost at Sea: The Strange Route of the Lena Shoal Junk. London: Periplus.

    Google Scholar 

  • L’Hour, M. (2001). Site analysis and FInd distribution: An archaeological reconstruction of the Brunei Wreck, TotalFinaElf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, V. (2009). Strange parallels: Southeast Asia in global context, C. 800–1830 (Vol. 2) Mainland Mirrors: Europe, Japan, China. South Asia, and the Islands. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manguin, P. Y. (1984). Relationships and cross-influences between Southeast Asian and Chinese shipbuilding traditions. SPAFA final report on maritime shipping and trade networks in Southeast Asia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manguin, P. Y. (1998). Ships and shippers in East Asian waters in the Mid-2nd Millennium A.D. Paper presented at the Asian Ceramics Conference, Field Museum of Natural History. October 23–25, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manguin, P. Y. (2003). Trading networks and ships in the South China Sea. Art Exhibitions Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manguin, P. Y. (2004). The archaeology of early maritime polities of Southeast Asia. Southeast Asia: From Prehistory to History. pp. 282–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miksic, J. N. (2004). The Classical Cultures of Indonesia. In Southeast Asia: From Prehistory to History. G. Ian, B. Peter (Eds.). Routledge Curzon. London. pp. 234–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, J. V. G. (1970). Ma Huan Ying-yai Sheng-lan. The Overall Survey of the Ocean’s Shores, 1433. pp. 77–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muljana, S. (1976). A story of Majapahit. Singapore: Singapore University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orillaneda, B. (2008). The Santa Cruz, Zambales Shipwreck Ceramics: Understanding Southeast Asian Ceramic Trade during the Late 15th Century C.E. A master’s thesis submitted to the archaeological studies program, University of the Philippines, Diliman, Quezon City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pombejra, D. (2005). Siam’s trade and foreign contacts in the 17th and 18th centuries. In The Kingdom of Siam: The Art of Central Thailand, 1350–1800. A Joint Project of Snoeck Publishers, Buppha Press, Art Media Resources, Inc., and the Asian Art Museum of San Francisco—Chong-Moon Lee Center for Asian Art and Culture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prishanchit, S. (1996). Maritime trade during the 14th–17th Century A.D.: Evidence from the underwater archaeological sites in the Gulf of Thailand. In Amara Srisuchat (Ed.), Ancient trades and cultural contacts in Southeast Asia (pp. 275–300). Bangkok: The Office of the National Culture Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ploymukda, S. (2013). The new evidence of the Rangkwien shipwreck 2012–2013. In Proceedings of the First SEAMEO SPAFA International Conference of Southeast Asian Archaeology. 7–10 May, 2013. Thailand, Chonburi: Burapha University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, A., 1988. Southeast Asia in the age of commerce.Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, A. (1990). An ‘Age of Commerce’ in Southeast Asian history. Modern Asian Studies, 24(1), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, A. (1993). Southeast Asia in the age of commerce, 1450–1680: Volume 2, expansion and crisis. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, A. (1995). Documenting the Rise and Fall of Ayudhya as a Regional Trade Centre. In K. Jittasevi (Ed.), Ayudhya and Asia (pp. 85–99). Bangkok: Thammasat University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, A. (1996). Flows and seepages in the long-term Chinese interaction with Southeast Asia. Sojourners and settlers: Histories of Southeast Asia and the Chinese, 15–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, A. (1999). Chams on the Southeast Asian Realm. In Charting the shape of early modern Southeast Asia (pp. 39–55). USA: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, A. (2009). The rise and fall of Sino-Javanese shipping. In Geoff Wade (Ed.), China and Southeast Asia (pp. 71–117). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato, Y. (2013). Investigations of burials and artifacts found at the Krang Kor site, Cambodia. In Proceedings of the 1st SEAMEO SPAFA International Conference on Southeast Asian Archaeology (7–10 May 2013) at Burapha University in Chonburi, Thailand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, L. (1996). Maritime Southeast Asia to 1500.M.E. Sharp. New York: Armonk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjostrand, S., Bin Haji Taha, A., Bin Sahar, S. (2006). Mysteries of Malaysian shipwrecks. Ministry of culture, arts and heritage Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southworth, W.A. (2004). The Coastal States of Champa. In I. Glover & P. Bellwood (Eds.), Southeast Asia from prehistory to history. London: RoutledgeCurzon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, M. (2004). Pre-Angkorian and Angkorian Cambodia. In I. Glover & P. Bellwood (Eds.), Southeast Asia: From prehistory to history (pp. 89–119). London: RoutledgeCurzon.

    Google Scholar 

  • T’ien, J. K. (1981). Cheng Ho’s voyages and the distribution of pepper in China. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society New Series, 2, 186–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, Rita C. (1998/99). A note on the dating of Ming Minyao blue and white ware. Oriental Art, 44(4), 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, R. C. (2001). Ming Blue and White Wares Found in the Philippines: Reflections on China’s Trade Patterns with the Philippines in the 15th and 16th Centuries. Oriental Ceramic Society of Hongkong Bulletin, 12, 1998–2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, K. (1992). The Early Kingdoms. In The Cambridge history of Southeast Asia Vol. 1, From Early Times to c. 1800 (pp. 137–182). Singapore: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomaz, L. F. F. R. (1993). The Malay sultanate of Melaka. In A. Reid (Ed.), Southeast Asia in the early modern era: Trade, power, and belief. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, G. (1994). The Ming Shi-lu (veritable records of the Ming Dynasty) as a source for Southeast Asian history, 14th to 17th centuries (Doctoral dissertation, University of Hong Kong).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, G. (2000). The Ming shilu as a Source for Thai history—Fourteenth to seventeenth centuries. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 31, 249–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, G. (2008). Engaging the South: Ming China and Southeast Asia in the Fifteenth Century. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, 51, 578–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, G. (2010) Southeast Asia in the 15th century. In W. Geoff & Laichen, S. (Eds.), Southeast Asia in the fifteenth century: The China factor (pp. 3–43). Singapore, Hong Kong: NUS Press Singapore and the Hong Kong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wake, C. H. (1964). Malacca’s early kings and the reception of Islam. Journal of Southeast Asian History, 5(2), 104–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, G. (1964). The opening of relations between China and Malacca, 1403–1405. In J. Bastin & R. Roolvink (Eds.), Malayan and Indonesian studies essays presented to Sir Richard Winstedt on his 85th birthday (pp. 87–104). Clarendon: Oxford at the Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, G. (1968). Early ming relations with Southeast Asia: A Background Essay. In J. K. Fairbank (Ed.), The Chinese world order: Traditional China’s foreign relations. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, G. (1998). The Nanhai trade: the early history of Chinese trade in the South China Sea. Singapore: Times Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicks, R. S. (1992). Money, markets, and trade in early Southeast Asia: The development of indigenous monetary systems to AD 1400 (No. 11). Cornell University Southeast Asia.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bobby C. Orillaneda .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Orillaneda, B.C. (2016). Of Ships and Shipping: The Maritime Archaeology of Fifteenth Century CE Southeast Asia. In: Wu, C. (eds) Early Navigation in the Asia-Pacific Region. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0904-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0904-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0903-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0904-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics