Advertisement

Scientific Principles for General Systemology

  • David Rousseau
  • Jennifer Wilby
  • Julie Billingham
  • Stefan Blachfellner
Chapter
Part of the Translational Systems Sciences book series (TSS, volume 13)

Abstract

In this chapter, we develop a detailed discussion about the nature and evolution of general principles in science, how they relate to worldviews, laws, theories and theoretical virtues. We then apply this analysis to systems principles, to develop strategies for deriving general scientific systems principles. By applying these insights and also the conclusions from previous chapters we then present work done to discover three general scientific systems principles, and discuss some of the practical implications of these principles.

Keywords

Heuristic systems principles Scientific systems principles The PLT model The conservation of properties principle The principle of universal interdependence The principle of complexity dominance 

References

  1. Ackoff, R. L. (1971). Towards a system of systems concepts. Management Science, 17(11), 661–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnold, R. D., & Wade, J. P. (2015). A definition of systems thinking: A systems approach. Procedia Computer Science, 44, 669–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Augustine, N. R. (1987). Augustine’s Laws. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  4. Award#1645065 – EAGER/Collaborative Research: Lectures for Foundations in Systems Engineering. (n.d.). Retrieved January 15, 2017, from https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1645065&HistoricalAwards=false
  5. Boulding, K. E. (1956). General systems theory – The skeleton of science. Management Science, 2(3), 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bunge, M. (1979). Ontology II: A world of systems. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  7. Bunge, M. (2000). Energy: Between physics and metaphysics. Science & Education, 9(5), 459–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bunge, M. (2003). Emergence and convergence: Qualitative novelty and the unity of knowledge. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  9. Calvo-Amodio, J., Kittelman, S., & Wang, S. (2017). Applications of systems science principles. Presented in the Workshop on ‘Systems Science – Principles for the Evolution of Systems’, held on the 18th of October 2017 as part of the 2017. International annual conference of the American Society for Engineering Management (ASEM) on the theme ‘Reimagining Systems Engineering and Management’, October 18th–21st, 2017, Marriott Hotel – Huntsville, Alabama, USA.Google Scholar
  10. Chakravartty, A. (2010). A metaphysics for scientific realism: Knowing the unobservable. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Chakravartty, A. (2013, Summer). Scientific realism. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/scientific-realism/
  12. Collopy, P. D., & Mesmer, B. L. (2014). Report on the Science of systems engineering workshop. In 53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences meeting (pp. 1–4). Kissimmee, FL: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.Google Scholar
  13. Danielle-Allegro, B., & Smith, G. (2016). Exploring the branches of the systems tree. Castelnau d’Estretefonds: Les editions Allegro Brigitte D.Google Scholar
  14. De Caro, M., & Macarthur, D. (2010). Naturalism and normativity. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Dilworth, C. (1996). The metaphysics of science: An account of modern science in terms of principles, Laws and Theories. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ellis, B. (2009). The metaphysics of scientific realism. Durham: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Flyvbjerg, B. (2014). What you should know about megaprojects and why: An overview. Project Management Journal, 45(2), 6–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Francois, C. (Ed.). (2004). International encyclopedia of systems and cybernetics. Munich: Saur Verlag.Google Scholar
  19. Friendshuh, L., & Troncale, L. R. (2012). Identifying fundamental systems processes for a general theory of systems. In Proceedings of the 56th Annual conference, International Society for the Systems Sciences (ISSS), July 15–20, San Jose State University, 23 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Gall, J. (1978). Systemantics: How systems work and especially how they fail. New York: Pocket Books.Google Scholar
  21. Gillett, C., & Loewer, B. (Eds.). (2001). Physicalism and its discontents. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hardy-Vallee, B. (2012). The cost of bad project management. Business Journal (Gallup Inc). Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/businessjournal/152429/Cost-Bad-Project-Management.aspx
  23. Heylighen, F. (2012). Self-organization of complex, intelligent systems: An action ontology for transdisciplinary integration. Integral Review. Retrieved from http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/papers/ECCO-paradigm.pdf
  24. Hitchins, D. K. (1992). Putting systems to work. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE). (2014). A world in motion – Systems engineering vision 2025. San Diego, CA: INCOSE. Retrieved from http://www.incose.org/AboutSE/sevision
  26. Jones, D. (2016, February 20). 66% of IT Projects fail. Retrieved April 27, 2017, from https://projectjournal.co.uk/2016/02/20/66-of-it-projects-fail/
  27. Katina, P. F. (2016). Systems theory as a foundation for discovery of pathologies for complex system problem formulation. InApplications of systems thinking and soft operations research in managing complexity (pp. 227–267). Cham: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21106-0_11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Koestler, A. (1967). The ghost in the machine. Chicago: Henry Regnery.Google Scholar
  29. Koons, R. C., & Bealer, G. (Eds.). (2010). The waning of materialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Kramer, N. J. T. A., & De Smit, J. (1977). Systems thinking: Concepts and notions. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Krigsman, M. (2012, April 10). Worldwide cost of IT failure (revisited): $3 trillion. Retrieved November 27, 2017, from http://www.zdnet.com/article/worldwide-cost-of-it-failure-revisited-3-trillion/
  32. Lineberger, R. (2016, October 24). Deloitte study: Cost overruns persist in major defense programs — Press release | Deloitte US. Retrieved February 27, 2017, from https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/about-deloitte/articles/press-releases/cost-overruns-persist-in-major-defense-programs.html
  33. Maier, M. W., & Rechtin, E. (2009). The art of systems architecting (3rd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  34. Matthewson, J., & Weisberg, M. (2009). The structure of tradeoffs in model building. Synthese, 170(1), 169–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Maxwell, N. (2004). Non-empirical requirements scientific theories must satisfy: Simplicity, unification, explanation, beauty. In J. Earman & J. Norton (Eds.), PhilSci archive. Pentire Press. Retrieved from http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/1759/
  36. McNamara, C., & Troncale, L. R. (2012). SPT II.: How to find & map linkage propositions for a general theory of systems from the Natural Sciences literature. In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Conference, International Society for the Systems Sciences (ISSS), July 15–20, San Jose State University, 17 pp.Google Scholar
  37. Mingers, J. (2006). Realising systems thinking: Knowledge and action in management science. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  38. Mingers, J. (2014). Systems thinking, critical realism and philosophy: A confluence of ideas. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Mobus, G. E., & Kalton, M. C. (2014). Principles of systems science (2015th ed.). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  40. Poli, R. (2001). The basic problem of the theory of levels of reality. Axiomathes, 12(3–4), 261–283.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015845217681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pratt, J. M., & Cook, S. C. (2018). A principles framework to inform Defence SoSE Methodologies. In A. M. Madni, B. Boehm, R. Ghanem, D. Erwin, & M. J. Wheaton (Eds.), Disciplinary convergence in systems engineering research (pp. 197–213). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rapoport, A. (1968). General system theory. In D. L. Sills (Ed.), The International encyclopedia of Social Sciences (Vol. 15, pp. 452–458). New York: Macmillan/The Free Press.Google Scholar
  43. Rousseau, D. (2011). Minds, souls and nature: A systems-philosophical analysis of the mind-body relationship in the light of near-death experiences (PhD thesis). University of Wales Trinity Saint David, Lampeter, Wales, UK.Google Scholar
  44. Rousseau, D. (2017a). Strategies for discovering scientific systems principles. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 34(5), 527–536.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rousseau, D. (2017b, March 23–25). Three general systems principles and their derivation: Insights from the philosophy of science applied to systems concepts. In Proceedings of the 15th annual conference on systems engineering research – Disciplinary convergence: Implications for systems engineering research.Google Scholar
  46. Rousseau, D. (2018a). Three general systems principles and their derivation: Insights from the philosophy of science applied to systems concepts. In A. M. Madni, B. Boehm, R. Ghanem, D. Erwin, & M. J. Wheaton (Eds.), Disciplinary convergence in systems engineering research (pp. 665–681). New York, NY: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62217-0_46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rousseau, D. (2018b). On the architecture of systemology and the typology of its principles. Systems, 6(1), 7.  https://doi.org/10.3390/systems6010007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rousseau, D., Wilby, J. M., Billingham, J., & Blachfellner, S. (2015, August 4, 2015). Manifesto for General Systems Transdisciplinarity (GSTD). Plenary Presentation at the 59th Conference of the International Society for the Systems Sciences (ISSS), Berlin, Germany, see also http://systemology.org/manifesto.html.
  49. Rueger, A., & McGivern, P. (2010). Hierarchies and levels of reality. Synthese, 176(3), 379–397.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9572-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schindel, W. D. (2011). What is the smallest model of a system? In Proceedings of the INCOSE 2011 International symposium, International Council on Systems Engineering (Vol. 21(1), pp. 99–113). Citeseer.Google Scholar
  51. Schindel, W. D. (2013). Abbreviated Systematica™ 4.0 glossary—Ordered by concept. Terre Haute, IN: ICTT System Sciences.Google Scholar
  52. Schoderbek, P. P., Schoderbek, C. G., & Kefalas, A. G. (1990). Management systems: Conceptual considerations (Revised ed.). Boston: IRWIN.Google Scholar
  53. Schöttl, F., & Lindemann, U. (2015). Quantifying the complexity of socio-technical systems–a generic, interdisciplinary approach. Procedia Computer Science, 44, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schrenk, M. (2016). Metaphysics of science: A systematic and historical introduction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. London: Random House.Google Scholar
  56. Sillitto, H., Dori, D., Griego, R. M., Jackson, S., Krob, D., Godfrey, P., et al. (2017). Defining “system”: A comprehensive approach. INCOSE International Symposium, 27(1), 170–186.  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-5837.2017.00352.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sillitto, H., Dori, D., Griego, R. M., Krob, D., Arnold, E., McKinney, D., Godfrey, P., Martin, J., Jackson, S. (2018). What do we mean by “system”? - System beliefs and worldviews in the INCOSE community. Proceedings of the INCOSE International Symposium, Washington, DC, USA, 7–12 July 2018. (17 pages).Google Scholar
  58. Syal, R. (2013, September 18). Abandoned NHS IT system has cost £10bn so far. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/sep/18/nhs-records-system-10bn
  59. Troncale, L. R. (1978). Linkage propositions between fifty principal systems concepts. In G. J. Klir (Ed.), Applied general systems research (pp. 29–52). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Troncale, L. R. (1985). The future of general systems research: Obstacles, potentials, case studies. Systems Research, 2(1), 43–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Troncale, L. R. (1988). The systems sciences: What are they? Are they one, or many? European Journal of Operational Research, 37(1), 8–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. von Bertalanffy, L. (1950). An outline of general system theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1(2), 134–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. von Bertalanffy, L. (1956). General System Theory. General Systems [Article Reprinted in Midgley, G. (Ed) (2003) ‘Systems Thinking’ (London: Sage) Vol 1, pp 36–51. Page Number References in the Text Refer to the Reprint.], 1, 1–10.Google Scholar
  64. von Bertalanffy, L. (1969). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York: Braziller.Google Scholar
  65. Walden, D. D., Roedler, G. J., Forsberg, K. J., Hamelin, R. D., & Shortell, T. M. (Eds.). (2015). Systems engineering handbook (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  66. Weinberg, S. (2008). Newtonianism, reductionism and the art of congressional testimony. In M. A. Bedau & P. Humphreys (Eds.), Emergence: Contemporary readings in philosophy and science (pp. 345–357). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Retrieved from http://ip144.qb.fcen.uba.ar/libroslfp/Historia%20y%20Filosofia%20de%20la%20Ciencia/Bedau%20-%20Emergence%20-%20Contemporary%20Readings%20in%20Philosophy%20and%20Science%20(MIT,%202008).pdf#page=362 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wilby, J. M., Rousseau, D., Midgley, G., Drack, M., Billingham, J., & Zimmermann, R. (2015). Philosophical foundations for the modern systems movement. In M. Edson, G. Metcalf, G. Chroust, N. Nguyen, & S. Blachfellner (Eds.), Systems thinking: New directions in theory, practice and application, Proceedings of the 17th Conversation of the International Federation for Systems Research, St. Magdalena, Linz, Austria, 27 April–2 May 2014 (pp. 32–42). Linz: SEA-Publications, Johannes Kepler University.Google Scholar
  68. Wimsatt, W. (2007). Re-engineering philosophy for limited beings: Piecewise approximations to reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© David Rousseau 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Rousseau
    • 1
  • Jennifer Wilby
    • 2
  • Julie Billingham
    • 1
  • Stefan Blachfellner
    • 3
  1. 1.Centre for Systems PhilosophyAddlestoneUK
  2. 2.Centre for Systems Studies, University of HullKingston upon HullUK
  3. 3.Bertalanffy Center for the Study of Systems ScienceViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations