Skip to main content

Stakeholder Impact Analysis for Highway Maintenance Management Based on System Dynamics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 20th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate
  • 2854 Accesses

Abstract

It is necessary to study the long-term and dynamic relationships or interactions between the highway and stakeholders such as operator, government department and users in planning the highway maintenance system. The system dynamics method is adopted to model the long-term and dynamic relationships among the highway and stakeholders. The causal loop diagram and stock-flow diagram for the system dynamics model is developed based on the quantitative relationships among relevant variables such as pavement performance, total costs, maintenances policies, threshold to initiate maintenance operations, yearly government investment scheme and subsidy allocation rule, and users’ attitude. Application of the proposed system dynamics model is demonstrated through a case study. This study provides an alternative platform to help stakeholders plan and evaluate maintenance polices and relevant management mechanisms from the perspective of a long time period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wu WJ (2009) Research on highway management system, Chang-an University

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fallah FS, Rahmandad H, Triantis K et al (2010) Optimizing highway maintenance operations: dynamic considerations. Syst Dyn Rev 26(3):216–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fwa TF, Farhan J (2012) Optimal multi asset maintenance budget allocation in highway asset management. J Transp Eng 138(10):1179–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jesus M, Akyildiz S, Bish DR et al (2011) Network-level optimization of pavement maintenance renewal strategies. Adv Eng Inf 25(4):699–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li THY, Ng ST, Skitmore M (2013) Evaluating stakeholder satisfaction during public participation in major infrastructure and construction projects: a fuzzy approach. Autom Constr 29:123–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Van der Lei TE, Herder PM (2011) A double analysis of stakeholder interaction in public infrastructure management. Facilities 29(13/14):563–576

    Google Scholar 

  7. Doloi H (2012) Assessing stakeholders’ influence on social performance of infrastructure projects. Facilities 30(11/12):531–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Osman H (2012) Agent-based simulation of urban infrastructure asset management activities. Autom Constr 28:45–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Osman H, Ali M (2012) Complex systems modeling of infrastructure assets, operators, users, and politicians using system dynamics. Construction Research Congress, pp 2280–2289

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhou Q, Zhou GP, Yu LJ (2009) The evaluation to users’ satisfaction of highway service. J Traffic Transp Eng 06:80–86

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wang QF (1998) System dynamics. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chow J, Kokotovic P (1985) Time scale modeling of sparse dynamic networks. IEEE Trans Autom Control 30(8):714–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Feng L, Zhou J (2010) System dynamics model of engineering management in the mode of partnerring. Syst Eng 08:96–100

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cui X, Zhou KC, Cao DB et al (2011) Modeling the system dynamics model of commodity residence in Beijing and the application in early warning. Syst Eng Theory Pract 04:672–678

    Google Scholar 

  15. Liu K (2004) The process of practical Markov decisions. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  16. Deng SY, Pan SP (2012) Prediction and analysis of the best time for the highway preventive maintenance. J Chongqing Technol Bus Univ (Nat Sci Ed) 08:69–73

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hu FS (2009) The study of impacts to recommendation intentions and willingness to pay of the visitors from tourism destination image. Zhejiang University, Zhejiang

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wang Y, Hu CB, Zhou LY et al (2000) The statistical features study of parameters of highway pavement performance. J Shenyang Architectural Civil Eng Inst 03:182–185

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hu CB, Zhou LC, Zhou LY (2000) The study of highway maintenance cost model. J Shenyang Archit Civil Eng Inst 01:7–9

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong Zhang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhang, H., Zheng, R., Ren, F. (2017). Stakeholder Impact Analysis for Highway Maintenance Management Based on System Dynamics. In: Wu, Y., Zheng, S., Luo, J., Wang, W., Mo, Z., Shan, L. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0855-9_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0855-9_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0854-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0855-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics