Advertisement

Introduction of Robot Platforms and Relevant Tools

  • Chenguang YangEmail author
  • Hongbin MaEmail author
  • Mengyin Fu
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter introduces a number of robot platforms and relevant devices used throughout this book, including the humanoid robot platforms such as Baxter robot and iCub robot; visual sensors of Microsoft Kinect, stereo camera Point Grey Bumblebee2 and 3D camera Leap Motion, as well as haptic devices of SensAble Omni and Novint joystick Falcon. Meanwhile, a number of software toolkits useful in robot simulation are also introduced in this chapter, e.g., the MATLAB Robotics Toolbox and the Virtual Robot Experiment Platform (V-REP) simulator. Robot Operating System (ROS) is also briefly introduced by highlighting the ROS characters and ROS level concepts. These devices and toolkits are nowadays becoming more and more popularly used in the study of robotics, as they provide ideal means for the study, design, and test of the robotic technologies.

Keywords

Humanoid Robot Inverse Kinematic Haptic Device Leap Motion Scene Object 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Mohan, V., Morasso, P., Zenzeri, J., Metta, G., Chakravarthy, V.S., Sandini, G.: Teaching a humanoid robot to draw shapes. Auton. Robot. 31(1), 21–53 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fumagalli, M., Randazzo, M., Nori, F., Natale, L., Metta, G., Sandini, G.: Exploiting proximal f/t measurements for the icub active compliance. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 1870–1876. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fabian, J., Young, T., Peyton Jones, J.C., Clayton, G.M.: Integrating the microsoft kinect with simulink: real-time object tracking example. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mech. 19(1), 249–257 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Colvin, C.E., Babcock, J.H., Forrest, J.H., Stuart, C.M., Tonnemacher, M.J., Wang, W.-S.: Multiple user motion capture and systems engineering. In: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS), pp. 137–140. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Chye, C., Nakajima, T.: Game based approach to learn martial arts for beginners. In: Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 18th International Conference on Embedded and Real-Time Computing Systems and Applications (RTCSA), pp. 482–485. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Soltani, F., Eskandari, F., Golestan, S.: Developing a gesture-based game for deaf/mute people using microsoft kinect. In: Proceedings of the 2012 Sixth International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems (CISIS), pp. 491–495. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Borenstein, G.: Making Things See: 3D Vision with Kinect, Processing, Arduino, and MakerBot, vol. 440. O’Reilly, Sebastopol (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cruz, L., Lucio, D., Velho, L.: Kinect and rgbd images: challenges and applications. In: Proceedings of the 2012 25th SIBGRAPI Conference on Graphics, Patterns and Images Tutorials (SIBGRAPI-T), pp. 36–49. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yang, C., Amarjyoti, S., Wang, X., Li, Z., Ma, H., Su, C.-Y.: Visual servoing control of baxter robot arms with obstacle avoidance using kinematic redundancy. In: Proceedings of the Intelligent Robotics and Applications, pp. 568–580. Springer (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    The principle of leap motion. http://www.3dfocus.com.cn/news/show-440.html
  13. 13.
    Chen, S., Ma, H., Yang, C., Fu, M.: Hand gesture based robot control system using leap motion. In: Proceedings of the Intelligent Robotics and Applications, pp. 581–591. Springer (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Xu, C.B., Zhou, M.Q., Shen, J.C., Luo, Y.L., Wu, Z.K.: A interaction technique based on leap motion. J. Electron. Inf. Technol. 37(2), 353–359 (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pan, S.Y.: Design and feature discussion of MIDI. controller based on leap motion. Sci. Technol. China’s Mass Media 10, 128–129 (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang, Q.Q., Xu, Y.R., Bai, X., Xu, D., Chen, Y.L., Wu, X.Y.: Dynamic gesture recognition using 3D trajectory. In: Proceedings of 2014 4th IEEE International Conference on Information Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guanzhou, China, pp. 598–601, April 2014Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Veras, E., Khokar, K., Alqasemi, R., Dubey, R.: Scaled telerobotic control of a manipulator in real time with laser assistance for adl tasks. J. Frankl. Inst. 349(7), 2268–2280 (2012)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chi, P., Zhang, D.: Virtual fixture guidance for robot assisted teleoperation. In: Bulletin of advanced technology, Vol 5, No. 7, Jul 2011Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hayn, H., Schwarzmann, D.: Control concept for a hydraulic mobile machine using a haptic operating device. In: Proceedings of the 2009 Second International Conferences on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions, ACHI’09, pp. 348–353. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sansanayuth, T., Nilkhamhang, I., Tungpimolrat, K.: Teleoperation with inverse dynamics control for phantom omni haptic device. In: 2012 Proceedings of the SICE Annual Conference (SICE), pp. 2121–2126. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Silva, A.J., Ramirez, O.A.D., Vega, V.P., Oliver, J.P.O.: Phantom omni haptic device: Kinematic and manipulability. In: Proceedings of the 2009 Electronics, Robotics and Automotive Mechanics Conference, CERMA’09, pp. 193–198. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mohammadi, A., Tavakoli, M., Jazayeri, A.: Phansim: a simulink toolkit for the sensable phantom haptic devices. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Canadian Congress of Applied Mechanics, pp. 787–790. Vancouver, BC, Canada (2011)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    N.W.S.: Company specialized in 3d haptic devices. http://www.novint.com/index.php (2012)
  24. 24.
    Martin, S., Hillier, N.: Characterisation of the novint falcon haptic device for application as a robot manipulator. In: Proceedings of the Australasian Conference on Robotics and Automation (ACRA), pp. 291–292. Citeseer (2009)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Distante, C., Anglani, A., Taurisano, F.: Target reaching by using visual information and q-learning controllers. Auton. Robot. 9(1), 41–50 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Corke, P., et al.: A computer tool for simulation and analysis: the robotics toolbox for MATLAB. In: Proceedings of the National Conference of the Australian Robot Association, pp. 319–330 (1995)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    MATLAB and Simulink for technical computing. http://www.mathworks.com/
  28. 28.
    Chinello, F., Scheggi, S., Morbidi, F., Prattichizzo, D.: KCT: a MATLAB toolbox for motion control of kuka robot manipulators. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 4603–4608. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Elons, A.S., Ahmed, M., Shedid, H., Tolba, M.F.: Arabic sign language recognition using leap motion sensor. In: Proceedings of the 2014 9th International Conference on Computer Engineering and Systems (ICCES), Cairos, pp. 368–373, December 2014Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Leap motion—mac and pc motion controller for games, design, virtual reality and moreGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ma, H., Wang, H., Fu, M., Yang, C.: One new human-robot cooperation method based on kinect sensor and visual-servoing. In: Proceedings of the Intelligent Robotics and Applications, pp. 523–534. Springer (2015)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    O’Kane, J.M.: A gentle introduction to ros (2014)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Martinez, A., Fernández, E.: Learning ROS for Robotics Programming. Packt Publishing Ltd, Birmingham (2013)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    ROS official. http://www.ros.org

Copyright information

© Science Press and Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Lab of Autonomous Systems and Networked Control, Ministry of EducationSouth China University of TechnologyGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.Centre for Robotics and Neural SystemsPlymouth UniversityDevonUK
  3. 3.School of AutomationBeijing Institute of TechnologyBeijingChina
  4. 4.State Key Lab of Intelligent Control and Decision of Complex SystemBeijing Institute of TechnologyBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations