Advertisement

Fusion Estimation for WSNs with Delays and Packet Losses

  • Wen-An Zhang
  • Bo Chen
  • Haiyu Song
  • Li Yu
Chapter
  • 551 Downloads

Abstract

Communication delays and packet losses are usually unavoidable in sensor networks and should be taken into consideration in the estimator design. Both centralized and distributed fusion estimation methods have been presented in [1–3] for multisensor fusion estimation systems with delays or packet losses. To deal with the delays and packet losses simultaneously, the centralized fusion estimators have been designed in [4, 5] by using Kalman filtering and linear matrix inequality approaches, and the distributed fusion estimation algorithm was developed in [6] based on the well-known federated Kalman filtering approach. In [5, 6], the time-varying delay was identified by using the time-stamp method over each estimation interval, and exact values of the time delays should be known to update the estimator gain matrices online.

Keywords

Packet Loss Local Estimate Fusion Center Random Delay Linear Matrix Inequality Approach 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Chiuso A, Schenato L (2011) Information fusion strategies and performance bounds in packet-drop networks. Automatica 47:1304–1316MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ma J, Sun S (2011) Information fusion estimators for systems with multiple sensors of different packet dropout rates. Inf Fusion 12(3):213–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hounkpevi FO, Yaz EE (2007) Robust minimum variance linear state estimators for multiple sensors with different failure rates. Automatica 43(7):1274–1280MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schenato L (2007) Optimal sensor fusion for distributed sensors subject to random delay and packet loss. In: Proceedings of the 46th IEEE conference on decision and control, New Orleans, pp 1547–1552Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Penarrocha I, Sanchis R, Albertos P (2012) Estimation in multisensor networked systems with scarce measurements and time varying delays. Syst Control Lett 61:555–562MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xia Y, Shang J, Chen J, Liu GP (2009) Networked data fusion with packet losses and variable delays. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern 39(5):1107–1120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen B, Yu L, Zhang WA, Liu AD (2013) Robust information fusion estimator for multiple delay-tolerant sensors with different failure rates. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst-I Regul Pap 60(2):401–414MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang ZD, Ho DWC, Liu XH (2003) Variance-constrained filtering for uncertain stochastic systems with missing measurements. IEEE Trans Autom Control 48(7):1254–1258MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gao H, Meng X, Chen T (2008) Stabilization of networked control systems with a new delay characterization. IEEE Trans Autom Control 53(9):2142–2148MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sun SL, Deng ZL (2004) Multi-sensor optimal information fusion Kalman filter. Automatica 40(6):1017–1023MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jazwioski AH (1970) Stochastic processes and filtering theory. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bar-Shalom Y, Li XR, Kirubarajan T (2001) Estimation with applications to tracking and navigation. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Beijing and Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wen-An Zhang
    • 1
  • Bo Chen
    • 1
  • Haiyu Song
    • 2
  • Li Yu
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of AutomationZhejiang University of TechnologyHangzhouChina
  2. 2.Zhejiang Uni. of Finance & EconomicsHangzhouChina
  3. 3.Zhejiang University of TechnologyHangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations