Abstract
In this chapter we focus on the relationship between foreign trade and sustainable development in the case of the Chinese regions. Foreign trade may affect pollution outcomes and the environment via various different channels. The first channel is the so-called scale effect that is usually thought of as harmful to the environment, which pertains to the scenario where the expansion of domestic production pressured by increasing trade openness results in more environmental pollution.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
We need to assume that the integral in (6.1) converges for the forecast.
- 2.
Both production functions are increasing, concave and linearly homogeneous.
- 3.
For convenience, we assume that the economy is small in the world market and the government takes the price of good X as given.
- 4.
Or alternatively the government may issue the corresponding marketable pollution quotas that would yield the equilibrium level of pollution tax.
- 5.
The squared terms of the relevant independent variables are also included in the equation in order to take account of potential nonlinear partial effects of these variables as predicted by the EKC framework. The last three terms are the time varying intercept, the time constant regional heterogeneity, and the zero-mean idiosyncratic error term, respectively.
- 6.
In this study, owing to data availability, we choose three types of energy, namely, petroleum, coal, and natural gas for constructing our measure of regional carbon emission based on the formula above. Relevant data needed for the construction can be found in various official publications of the National Bureau of Statistics of China.
- 7.
Statistic significance discussed here in this analysis is at the usual 5Â % level unless otherwise stated.
References
Antweiler, W., B.R. Copeland, and M.S. Taylor. 2001. Is free trade good for the environment? American Economic Review 91(4): 877–908.
Arrow, Kenneth J., Partha Dasgupta, Lawrence H. Goulder, Kevin J. Mumford, and Kirsten Oleson. 2012. Sustainability and the measurement of wealth. Environment and Development Economics 17(3): 317–353.
Cole, M.A. 2004. Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental kuznets curve: Examining the linkages. Ecological Economics 48: 71–81.
Copeland, B.R., and M.S. Taylor. 2004. Trade, growth, and the environment. Journal of Economic Literature 42(1): 7–71.
Jiang, Yanqing. 2014a. Openness, economic development, and the environment in post-reform China: A model with empirical analysis. International Journal of Social Science Studies 2(3): 56–66.
Jiang, Y. 2014b. Understanding TFP growth in Inland Regions of China: An empirical study of the effects of three factors. International Review of Applied Economics 28(3): 364–381.
Jiang, Yanqing. 2015. Foreign trade and carbon emission: Empirical evidence from China. Scholars Journal of Economics, Business and Management 2(1B): 72–79.
Low, Patrick, Marcelo Olarreaga and Javier Suarez. 1998. Does globalization cause a higher concentration of international trade and investment flow? WTO Staff Working Paper ERAD-98-08 (August 1998), Economic Research and Analysis Division, World Trade Organization.
Mani, M., and D. Wheeler. 1998. In search of pollution havens? Dirty industry in the world economy, 1960–1995. Journal of Environment and Development 7(3): 215–247.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jiang, Y. (2016). Foreign Trade and Sustainable Development. In: Green Development in China. SpringerBriefs in Economics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0693-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0693-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0692-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0693-7
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)