Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to develop multilayered views of rules of gaming and simulations of international politics, especially with respect to the changeability of rules. In this case study, students play a role-playing game of the 2010 Senkaku boat collision incident. Many kinds of games and simulations of international politics are recognized today, but most of them use fixed rules. In real society, including international relations, rules and institutions are not continuous for forever; they are changeable and evolving because actors influence systems in the same way as they change systems. The “Senkaku game” is a trial of a history retrospection and a repeated type of gaming and simulation with this ability. This game is a simulation of a series of occurrences involving the arrest and indictment of the captain of a Chinese fishing boat by Japan in the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands. The actors are Japan, China, and the United States. The goal of playing the game is to reflect on and replay the incident, which factors are important and which factors and actors prefer which options and when. We would like to show this game not as a reiterative game for the future but as a historical reality. By understanding the historical reality through the theories of international relations, the results of the game can mainly be explained by neorealism. In reality, however, Japan and China reached a compromise based on a neoliberal institutionalist understanding. As a result of the first game, students discussed how they would change the rules and then played again with the changed rules to approach the historical reality. This game simulation led students to understand the history of international diplomacy and politics more easily.
Understanding International Politics through the Gaming Simulation
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Tadashi Okano (2006) once proposed a “rule-generation type of gaming and simulation.” This paper is partly based on his idea. We express our appreciation of him.
- 2.
For more information on this conflict, see the statement by the Chinese government on the islands: http://www.diaoyudao.org.cn/en/201501/22/content_34626699.htm; and that of the Japanese government: http://www.mofa.go.jp/region/asia-paci/senkaku/.
- 3.
For a simulation game of the European Union, see Switky, B. (2004). The importance of voting in international organizations: Simulating the case of European Union, International Studies Perspectives, 5, 40–49.
- 4.
Rittberger, V., & Zurn, M. (1990). Towards regulated anarchy in East–West relations: Causes and consequences of East–West regimes. In V. Rittberger (Ed.), International Regimes in East–West Politics. London: Pinter Publishers. Although Rittberger and Zurn argued about human rights regimes, the logic can be extended to security issues.
References
Adler, E., & Barnett, M. (Eds.). (1998). Security communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bothe, M., Ronzitti, N., & Rosas, A. (Eds.). (1997). The OSCE in the maintenance of peace and security: Conflict prevention, crisis management, and peaceful settlement of disputes. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Hermann, M. G. (1989). Inside the “black box”: Decision making and foreign policy. In J. R. Kruzel & J. N. Rosenau (Eds.), Journeys through world politics: Autobiographical reflections of thirty-four academic travelers (pp. 365–380). Lexington: Lexington.
Hermann, C. F., & Hermann, M. G. (1967). An attempt to simulate the outbreak of World War I. American Political Science Review, 61, 400–416.
Loggins, J. A. (2009). Simulating the foreign policy decision-making process in the undergraduate classroom. Political Science & Politics, 20(2), 4011–4407.
Mandel, R. (1987). An evaluation of the “balance of power” simulation. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 31(2), 333–345.
Mcintosh, D. (2001). The uses and limits of the Model United Nations in an international relations classroom. International Studies Perspectives, 2, 269–280.
Okano, T. (2006). Rule genereito gata simulation game no teian to taiken session. [Proposal for rule generating–type simulation game and game play session]. Proceedings of the 2006 JASAG spring conference 2006.
Rittberger, V., & Zurn, M. (1990). Towards regulated anarchy in East–West relations: Causes and consequences of East–West regimes. In V. Rittberger (Ed.), International regimes in East–West politics (pp. 9–63). London: Pinter Publishers.
Switky, B. (2004). The importance of voting in international organizations: Simulating the case of European Union. International Studies Perspectives, 5, 40–49.
Waltz, K. (1959). Man, the state and war: A theoretical analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.
Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391–425.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tamai, M., Kondo, A., Miyawaki, N. (2016). Understanding the History of International Politics: A Retrospective and Repeated Type of Gaming and Simulation in the Classroom. In: Kaneda, T., Kanegae, H., Toyoda, Y., Rizzi, P. (eds) Simulation and Gaming in the Network Society. Translational Systems Sciences, vol 9. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0575-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0575-6_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0574-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0575-6
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)