Advertisement

Languages and New Technologies: Learning Digital Portfolio in the Stylistics of English

  • María Alcantud DíazEmail author
Chapter
  • 907 Downloads
Part of the New Frontiers in Translation Studies book series (NFTS)

Abstract

The new perspective of the European Higher Education Area involves new methodologies which foster the information and communication technologies (ICTs). Educating (i.e. teaching and learning) by means of the European Credits Transfer System (ECTS) produced some very significant changes in issues such as “permanent learning and active learning” (Barragán 2009: 2) and ‘learning by means of (professional) competences’ which entail new learning methodologies and new evaluation processes.

Keywords

Project Work European High Education Area Learning Methodology Electronic Portfolio Final Mark 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Acker, Stephen R. 2005. Overcoming obstacles to authentic eportfolio assessment. Campus Technology. http://www.campustechnology.com/article.asp?id=10788. Accessed 6 July 2005.
  2. Alcantud Díaz, M. 2008. Innovation, motivation and sustainable development in second cycle of English. Proceedings of International Technology, Education and Development Conference.Google Scholar
  3. Alcantud Díaz, M. 2010. Tales in two minutes: ICT and project work. Valencia: Reproexpres Ediciones.Google Scholar
  4. Alcantud Diaz, M. 2011. A new way of creating detective short stories as an example of getting language and literature in contact. In Multiple voices in academic and professional discourse: Current issues in specialised language research, teaching and new technologies, ed. S. Maruenda and B. Clavel-Arroitia, 442–452. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  5. Alcantud- Díaz, M. (Coord.). 2014a. Cuentos alrededor del Mundo – Stories around the World, Volumen 1: Proyecto Mali. Madrid: Vaughan Systems.Google Scholar
  6. Alcantud- Díaz, M. (Coord.). 2014b. Cuentos alrededor del Mundo – Stories around the World, Volumen 2: Proyecto España. Madrid: Vaughan Systems.Google Scholar
  7. Armengol, J., J. Hernández, J. Mora, J. Rubio, F.J. Sánchez, and M. Valero. 2009. Experiencias sobre el uso del portafolio del estudiante en la UPC [Special Issue]. RED U – Revista de Docencia Universitaria III: 1–13.Google Scholar
  8. Austen, J.A. 1815. Emma, 2009th ed. New York: Wild Jot Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bach, D.J. 2009. Learning portfolios in the humanities classroom: Promoting intentional learning by helping students uncover what is meaningful to them. In The learning portfolios: Reflective practice for improving student learning, 2nd ed, ed. J. Zubizarreta, 75–85. San Francisco: Jossey Bass & Wiley Imprint.Google Scholar
  10. Baggio, R. 2008. Personalising learning through portfolios. Encuentro 17: 1–5.Google Scholar
  11. Barberá, E., A. Gewere Barujel, and J.L. Rodriguez Illera. 2009. Portafolios electrónicos y educación superior en España: situación y tendencias [Special issue]. Red U – Revista de Docencia Universitaria III: 1–13.Google Scholar
  12. Barberá Gregori, E., and E. De Martín Rojo. 2009. Portafolio electrónico: aprender a evaluar el aprendizaje. Barcelona: Editorial UOC.Google Scholar
  13. Barragán, R. 2005. El portafolio, metodología de evaluación y aprendizaje de cara al nuevo Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior. Una experiencia práctica en la Universidad de Sevilla. Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa 4(1): 1–8.Google Scholar
  14. Barragán, R., R. García, O. Buzón, M.A. Rebollo, and L. Vega. 2009. E-Portafolios en Procesos Blended-Learning: Innovaciones de la Evaluación en los Créditos Europeos [Special issue]. Red U – Revista de Docencia Universitaria III: 1–16.Google Scholar
  15. Barrell, S., L. Mivers, K. Nantz, and R. Torosyan. 2009. Getting started with portfolios: A vision for implementing reflection to enhance student learning. In The learning portfolios: Reflective practice for improving student learning, 2nd ed, ed. J. Zubizarreta, 85–97. San Francisco: Jossey Bass & Wiley Imprint.Google Scholar
  16. Barrett, H. 2001a. Electronic portfolios educational technology; An Encyclopaedia ABC-CLIO. http://www.electronicportfolios.com/portfolios/encyclopediaentry.htm. Accessed 20 June 2012.
  17. Barrett, H. 2001b. Create your own electronic portfolio. Learning & Leading with Technology 27(7): 14–21.Google Scholar
  18. Barrett, H. 2004a. Differentiating electronic portfolios and online assessment management systems. Proceedings of the 2004 annual conference of the Society for Information Technology in Teacher Education. http://electronicportfolios.org/systems/concerns.html. Accessed 17 Nov 2012.
  19. Barrett, H. 2004b. Electronic portfolios as digital stories of deep learning: Emerging digital tools to support reflection in learner-centered portfolios. http://electronicportfolios.org/digistory/epstory.html. Accessed 14 Jan 2013.
  20. Barrett, H. 2006. Digital stories in e-portfolios: Multiple purposes and tools. From: http://electronicportfolios.org/digistory/purposes.html. Accessed 15 Oct 2011.
  21. Barrett, H. 2010. Balancing the two faces of eportfolios. Educaçao, Formaçao & Tecnologias 3(1): 6–14.Google Scholar
  22. Barrett, H., and J. Carney. 2005. Conflicting paradigms and competing purposes in electronic portfolio development. Educational Assessment. http://electronicportfolios.com/portfolios/LEAJournal-BarrettCarney.pdf. Accessed 20 Sept 2012.
  23. Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 1998. Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. http://www.pdkintl.org/kappan/kbla9810.htm. Accessed 2 July 2012.
  24. Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 2005. The formative purpose: Assessment must first promote learning. In Towards coherence between classroom assessment and accountability, ed. M. Wilson. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  25. Blanch, S., M. Gelabert, A. Fuentes, X. Gimeno Soria, N. González Monfort, M. Rifà Valls, and N. Santiveri Papiol. 2009. Relaciones entre aprendizaje, cognición y tecnologías en la construcción del e-portafolio. Red U – Revista de Docencia Universitaria [Special issue] III: 1–13.Google Scholar
  26. Bradford, M. 1997. Stylistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Burke, K. 2009. How to assess authentic learning. California: Corwin (Sage).Google Scholar
  28. Calvo, Clara, and J.J. Weber. 1998. The literature workbook. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Cambridge, B. (ed.). 2001. Electronic portfolios. Emerging practices in student, faculty, and institutional learning. Sterling: Stylus Publishing.Google Scholar
  30. Castro Quitora, L. 2002. El portafolio de enseñanza como herramienta y texto para la reflexión pedagógica. Revista Perspectiva Educativa 3: 9–21.Google Scholar
  31. Coromina, J., F. Sabate, J. Romeu, and F. Ruiz. 2011. Portafolio digital de aprendizaje: Un nuevo medio de comunicación en la educación. Intangible Capital 7(1): 116–142.Google Scholar
  32. Crystal, D., and D. Derek. 1969. Investigating English style. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  33. Dickens, C. 1854. Hard times for these times. London: Bradbury and Evans Printers.Google Scholar
  34. Ellis, R. 2006. The methodology of task-based teaching. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly September 2006 Volume 8, Issue 3 Special Conference Proceedings Volume: Task-based Learning in the Asian Context.Google Scholar
  35. Fried-Booth, Diana L. 1990. Project work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Gea Valor, M.L. 2005. Advertising books: A linguistic analysis of blurbs. Ibérica 10: 41–52.Google Scholar
  37. Hertels, E. 2004. Experiential learning portfolios in professional programs: A Canadian perspective. In The learning portfolio, ed. J. Zubizarreta. Bolton: Anker Publishing.Google Scholar
  38. Ivers, K.S., and A.E. Barron. 1998. Multimedia projects in education: Designing, producing, and assessing. Englewood: Library Unlimited.Google Scholar
  39. López Fernández, O., and J.L. Rodriguez Illera. 2009. Investigating university students’ adaptation to a digital learner course portfolio. Computers & Education 52: 608–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nodelman, P., and M. Reimar. 2003. The pleasures of children’s literature. Boston: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  41. Paulson, F.L., and P. Paulson. 1994. Assessing portfolios using the constructivist paradigm. http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED376209.pdf. Accessed 14 Nov 2012.
  42. Poe, E.A. 1839. The fall of the house of usher. Burton’s Gentleman’s Magazine.Google Scholar
  43. Prendes Espinosa, M.P., and M.M. Sánchez Vera. 2008. Portafolio electrónico: posibilidades para los docentes. Pixel-Bit Revista de Medios y Educación 32: 21–34.Google Scholar
  44. Rhys, J. 1966. Wide Sargasso sea. Hardmonsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  45. Richards, J.C., and T.S. Rodgers. 2014. Approaches and methods in language teaching, 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Schank, R.C. 1995. What we learn when we learn by doing. Retrieved from the internet 02/12/2014. http://cogprints.org/637/1/LearnbyDoing_Schank.html.
  47. Stefani, L., R. Manson, and C. Pegler. 2007. The educational potential of eportfolios. Supporting personal development and reflective learning. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Zubizarreta, J. 2004. The learning portfolios: Reflective practice for improving student learning. Bolton: Anker.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universitat de ValènciaValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations