Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sustainable Impact Evaluation of Support Structures in the Production of Extrusion-Based Parts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Sustainability in Additive Manufacturing

Abstract

Sustainability creates and maintains the conditions under which humans and nature can exist in a productive harmony, fulfilling the social, economic and other requirements of present and future generations. Environmental and social concerns about human society’s impact on the natural environment have been pushing sustainable development issues. Sustainable industrial practices can contribute to the development of more sustainable materials, products, and processes. It is critical to apply eco-design principles and develop greener products and production processes, reducing impacts associated with production and consumption. Bearing this in mind, additive manufacturing has the capability of producing components with the lowest amount of raw material. Alongside with the raw material, in some additive manufacturing systems, support material is needed in order to undergo the production. This present work aims to evaluate the environmental impact of the support production methodologies in order to deliver awareness to the users of extrusion-based systems for a lower environmental impact assessment. The extra production time involved in the production of the support structures and the support structure removal is evaluated. The evaluation consisted of correlating the volume of support material and the time needed for its dissolution. Two different models were then compared with different support material production schemes, regarding the total energy consumption and its environmental impact. The results demonstrate that different support production schemes have significant environmental impact regarding both production and its dissolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ajoku U, Saleh N, Hopkinson N, Hague R, Poonjolai E (2006) Investigating mechanical anisotropy and end-of vector effect in laser-sintered nylon parts. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B Journal of Engineering Manufacture 220(7):1077–1086

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander P, Allen S, Dutta D (1998) Part orientation and build cost determination in layered manufacturing. Comput Aided Des 30(5):343–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen S, Dutta D (1995) On the computation of part orientation using support structures in layered manufacturing. Journal of Design and Manufacturing 5:153–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Ang KC, Leong KF, Chua CK, Chandrasekaran M (2006) Investigation of the mechanical properties and porosity relationships in fused deposition modelling-fabricated porous structures. Rapid Prototyping Journal 12(2):100–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armillotta A (2006) Assessment of surface quality on textured FDM prototypes. Rapid Prototyping Journal 12(1):35–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM Standard F2792 (2015) “Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing Technologies” URL: http://www.astm.org/Standards/F2792.htm

  • Atkins (2007) ATKINS Manufacturing a Low Carbon Footprint, ATKINS project report (http://www.atkins-project.com/pdf/ATKINSfeasibilitystudy.pdf)

  • Ayres RU, Simones UE (1994) Industrial Metabolism— Restructuring for Sustainable Development. The United Nations University, Tokyo/Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • Bártolo PJ, Almeida HA, Laoui T (2009) Rapid Prototyping & Manufacturing for Tissue Engineering Scaffolds. Computer Applications in Technology 36(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaman JJ, Barlow JW, Bourell DL, Crawford RH, Marcus HL, McAlea KP (1997) Solid freeform fabrication: a new direction in manufacturing. Kluwer Academic Press, Boston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baumers M (2012) Economic Aspects of Additive Manufacturing: benefits, Costs and Energy Consumption (Doctoral Thesis) Loughborough University, Leicestershire, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumers M, Tuck C, Wildman R, Ashcroft I, Hague R (2011) Energy inputs to additive manufacturing: does capacity utilization matter? In: Conference Paper: Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium 2011, Austin (TX)/USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry M (2004) The Importance of sustainable development. Canada, Columbia Spectator

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourell DL, Leu MC, Rosen DW (2009) Roadmap for additive manufacturing: identifying the future of freeform processing. The University of Texas at Austin

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourhis FL, Kerbrat O, Dembinski L, Hascoet JY, Mognol P (2013) Sustainable manufacturing: evaluation and modelling of environmental impacts in additive manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69:1927–1939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourhis FL, Kerbrat O, Dembinski L, Hascoet JY, Mognol P (2014) Predictive model for environmental assessment in additive manufacturing process. Procedia CIRP 15:26–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caffrey T, Wohlers T (2015) Wohlers Report 2015—Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing State of the Industry—Annual Worldwide Progress Report, Wohlers Associates, Inc. ISBN: 978-0-9913332-1-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell T, Williams C, Ivanova O, Garrett B (2011) Could 3D printing change the world? Technologies, and implications of additive manufacturing. Atlantic Council, Washington DC/USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Chockalingam K, Jawahar N, Ramanathan KN, Banerjee PS (2005) Optimization of stereolithography process parameters for part strength using design of experiments. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 29(1–2):79–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Chua CK, Fai LK (2000) Rapid prototyping: principles and applications in manufacturing. World Scientific

    Google Scholar 

  • Chua CK, Leong KF (2014) 3D printing and additive manufacturing—principles and applications, 4th edn. World Scientific Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Chua CK, Leong KF, Lim CS (2003) Rapid prototyping: principles and applications in manufacturing, 2 edn. World Scientific

    Google Scholar 

  • Crump SS (1989) Apparatus and method for creating three-dimensional objects, US Pat. 5121329

    Google Scholar 

  • Durgun I, Ertan R (2014) Experimental investigation of FDM process for improvement of mechanical properties and production cost. Rapid Prototyping J 20:228–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Equbal A, Ohdar RK, Mahapatra SS (2011) Prediction of dimensional accuracy in fused deposition modelling: A fuzzy logic approach. Int J Productivity Qual Manage 7(1):22–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finnvedena G, Hauschildb M, Ekvallc T, Guinée J, Heijungs R, Hellweg S, Koehler A, Pennington D, Suh S (2009) Recent developments in Life Cycle. J Environ Manage 92(1):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao W, Zhang Y, Ramanujan D, Ramani K, Chen Y, Williams CB, Wang CCL, Shin YC, Zhang S, Zavattieri PD (2015) The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering. Comput Aided Des 69:65–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebler M, Uiterkamp AJMS, Visser C (2014) A global sustainability perspective on 3D printing technologies. Energy Policy 74:158–167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson I (2011) Is additive manufacturing a sustainable technology? In: Bártolo H et al (eds) Proceedings of SIM2011 Sustainable Intelligent Manufacturing. IST Press, pp 583–589

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson I, Shi D (1997) Material properties and fabrication parameters in selective laser sintering process. Rapid Prototyping J 3:129–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson I, Rosen D, Stucker B (2015) Additive manufacturing technologies—3D printing, rapid prototyping and direct digital manufacturing, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Goedkoop M, Spriensama R (2001) The eco-indicator 99: a damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment. Methodology Report, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Hague R (2005) Unlocking the design potential of rapid manufacturing. In: Hopkinson N et al (eds) Rapid manufacturing: an industrial revolution for the digital age. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Hascoet JY, Marya S, Marya M, Singh V (2014) Materials science challenges in the additive manufacturing of industrial parts. In: Kai CC et al (eds) Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Progress in Additive Manufacturing (Pro-AM2014). Research Publishing Services, pp 133–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkinson N, Hague RJM, Dickens PM (2006) Rapid Manufacturing—an industrial revolution for the digital age. Wiley, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth G, Hadfield M (2006) A sustainable product design model. Mater Des 27(10):1128–1133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotliniski J (2014) Mechanical properties of commercial rapid prototyping materials. Rapid Prototyping J 20(6):499–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreiger M, Pearce JM (2013) Environmental life cycle analysis of distributed three-dimensional printing and conventional manufacturing of polymer products. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 1(12):1511–1519

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar GP, Regalla SP (2011) Optimization of support material and build time in Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM). Appl Mech Mater 110–116:2245–2251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee CS, Kim SG, Kim HJ, Ahn SH (2007) Measurement of anisotropic compressive strength of rapid prototyping parts. J Mater Process Technol 187–188:627–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lofthouse V (2006) Ecodesign tools for designers: defining the requirements. J Clean Prod 14(15–16):1386–1395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo Y, Ji Z, Leu MC, Caudill R (1999) Environmental performance analysis of solid freeform fabrication processes. In: Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment (ISEE-1999), IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  • Majewski C, Hopkinson N (2011) Effect of section thickness and build orientation on tensile properties and material characteristics of laser sintered nylon-12 parts. Rapid Prototyping J 17(3):176–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mihelcic JR, Crittenden JC, Small MJ, Shonnard DR, Hokanson DR, Zhang Q, Chen H, Sorby SA, James VU, Sutherland JW, Schnoor JL (2003) Sustainability science and engineering: the emergence of a new Metadiscipline. Environ Sci Technol 37(23):5314–5324

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment (2000) Eco-indicator 99 Manual for Designers—a damage oriented method for life cycle impact assessment. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow WR, Qi H, Kim I, Mazumder J, Skerlos SJ (2007) Environmental aspects of laser-based and conventional tool and die manufacturing. J Clean Prod 15:932–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onuh SO, Hon KKB (1998) Optimising build parameters for improved surface finish in stereolithography. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 38(4):329–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, Linden PJ, Hanson JE (2007) Technical summary. Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptations and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 23–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrovic V, Gonzales JVH, Ferrado OJ, Gordillo JD, Puchades JRB, Ginan LP (2011) Additive layered manufacturing: sectors of industrial application shown through case studies. Int J Prod Res 49(4):1071–1079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pham DT, Demov SS (2001) Rapid manufacturing: the technologies and applications of rapid prototyping and rapid tooling. Springer, London Limited

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Quintana R, Choi JW, Puebla K, Wicker R (2010) Effects of build orientation on tensile strength for stereolithography-manufactured ASTM D-638 type I specimens. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 46:201–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves P (2009) Additive Manufacturing—A supply chain wide response to economic uncertainty and environmental sustainability. International Conference on Industrial Tools and Material Processing Technologies, Ljubljana, Slovenia

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen D (2014) What are the principles for design for additive manufacturing? In: Kai CC et al (eds) Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Progress in Additive Manufacturing (Pro-AM2014), Research Publishing Services, pp 85–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Saqib S, Urbanic J (2012) An Experimental Study to Determine Geometric and Dimensional Accuracy Impact Factors for Fused Deposition Modelled Parts. In: ElMaraghy HA (ed) Enabling Manufacturing Competitiveness and Economic Sustainability. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 293–298

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Serres N, Tidu D, Sankare S, Hlawka F (2011) Environmental comparison of MESO-CLAD® process and conventional machining implementing life cycle assessment. J Clean Prod 19(9–10):1117–1124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (2007) Technical summary: climate change 2007: the Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Sood AK, Ohdar RK, Mahapatra SS (2009) Improving dimensional accuracy of Fused Deposition Modelling processed part using grey Taguchi method. Mater Des 30(10):4243–4252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sood AK, Ohdar RK, Mahapatra SS (2010) Parametric appraisal of mechanical property of fused deposition modelling processed parts. Mater Des 31(1):287–295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sood AK, Ohdar RK, Mahapatra SS (2012) Experimental investigation and empirical modelling of FDM process for compressive strength improvement. J Adv Res 3(1):81–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sreenivasan R, Goel A, Bourell DL (2010) “Sustainability issues in laser-based additive manufacturing”, LANE 2010. Phy Procedia 5:81–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stratasys Ltd. (2010) uPrint® and uPrint® Plus Personal 3D Printers User Guide. Stratasys Ltd

    Google Scholar 

  • Stratasys Ltd. (2015) Fortus 380MC and 450MC Spec Sheet. Stratasys Ltd

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrimurthulu K, Pandey PM, Reddy NV (2004) Optimum part deposition orientation in fused deposition modeling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44:585–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2012) Annual Report 2012. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, Kenya

    Google Scholar 

  • Vijay P, Danaiah P, Rajesh KVD (2012) Critical parameters effecting the rapid prototyping surface finish. J Mech Eng Autom 1(1):17–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vijay I, Chockalingam K, Kailasanathan C, Sivabharathy M (2014) Optimization of Surface roughness in selective laser sintered stainless steel parts. Int J ChemTech Res 6(5):2993–2999

    Google Scholar 

  • Volpato N, Foggiatto JA, Schwarz DC (2014) The influence of support base on FDM accuracy in Z. Rapid Prototyping J 20:2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Bernard A (2013) Using AM feature and multi-attribute decision making to orientate part in additive manufacturing. In: Bártolo PJ et al (eds) High value manufacturing. CRC Press, pp 411–416

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Technology and Management, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, Leiria, Portugal

    Henrique A. Almeida & Mário S. Correia

  2. CEMUC, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal

    Mário S. Correia

Authors
  1. Henrique A. Almeida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mário S. Correia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henrique A. Almeida .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Environmental Services Manager-Asia, SGS Hong Kong Limited, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

    Subramanian Senthilkannan Muthu

  2. Dept. of Industrial and Systems Eng., The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China

    Monica Mahesh Savalani

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Almeida, H.A., Correia, M.S. (2016). Sustainable Impact Evaluation of Support Structures in the Production of Extrusion-Based Parts. In: Muthu, S., Savalani, M. (eds) Handbook of Sustainability in Additive Manufacturing. Environmental Footprints and Eco-design of Products and Processes. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0549-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation