Skip to main content

Estimation of Peak Discharges Using Flood Frequency Analysis and Hydrological Modeling System

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
ISFRAM 2015

Abstract

This study presents the methodology to estimate peak discharges using flood frequency analysis (FFA) and hydrological modeling system (HMS). FFA method was performed using two distribution functions, i.e., Gumbel’s extreme value distribution (Gumbel’s) and lognormal (LN) distribution, while HMS was carried out using the Hydrologic Engineering Center’s Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC-HMS) software. Long and reliable daily streamflow and rainfall data (i.e., 50 years) recorded at Sungai Rinching, Selangor, were used. Goodness-of-fit test indicates that the chi-square (χ2) values for Gumbel’s and lognormal distributions are 1.952 and 7.976, respectively, which are significantly less than the \({\upchi}_{\alpha ,v}^{2}\) value of 9.488. However, Gumbel’s is chosen to represent the distribution of annual maximum daily streamflow because the χ2 test value was much lesser as compared to lognormal distribution. The calibration and validation processes were carried out to test the suitability of HEC-HMS software to simulate the streamflow of Sungai Rinching. The relative percentage difference (RPD) estimated for peak discharges from these processes was between 3 and 6 %, and maximum lag times were only 1 h. These results indicate that the model performance is very good. The peak discharges for several average recurrence intervals (ARIs), i.e., 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, and 100 years estimated using FFA and HMS, were also compared. Results show that the peak discharges estimated using HMS for all ARIs (except 2 years) are comparable to the values given by FFA, and the given percentage differences are between 2.7 and 12.2 %. This finding indicates that HEC-HMS may be used as a tool in simulating the daily streamflow and estimate the annual daily maximum streamflow of several ARIs at Sungai Rinching.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Suhaila J, Jemain AA (2007) Fitting daily rainfall amount in Malaysia using the normal transform distribution. J Appl Sci 7(14):1880–1886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Smithers J (2012) Methods for design flood estimation in South Africa. Water SA 38(4):633–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schulze RE (1989) Non-stationary catchment responses and other problems in determining flood series: a case for a simulation modelling approach. In: Kienzle SW, Maaren H (eds) Proceedings of the Fourth South African National Hydrological Symposium. Pretoria, South Africa, SANCIAHS, pp 135–157

    Google Scholar 

  4. Smithers JC, Schulze RE (2003) Design rainfall and flood estimation in South Africa. WRC report No. 1060/01/03. Water Research Commission, Pretoria, South Africa, p 155

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hosking J, Wallis J (1997) Regional frequency analysis: an approach based on L-moment. Cambridge University, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Cunnane C (1989) Statistical distribution for flood frequency analysis. WMO-report no. 781 (Operational hydrology report no. 33), p 73

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gabriele S, Arnell N (1991) A hierarchical approach to regional flood frequency analysis. Water Resour Res 27(6):1281–1289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kachroo RK, Mkhandi SH, Parida BP (2000) Flood frequency analysis of southern Africa: I. Delineation of homogeneous regions. Hydrol Sci J 45(3):437–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pilon PJ, Adamowski K (1992) The value of regional information to flood frequency analysis using the method of L-moments. Can J Civ Eng 19(1):137–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stedinger Vogel RM, Foufoula-Georgiou E (1993) Frequency analysis of extreme events. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mujere N (2011) Flood frequency analysis using the Gumbel’s distribution. Int J Comput Sci Eng (IJSCE) 3(7):2774–2778

    Google Scholar 

  12. Solomon O, Prince O (2013) Flood frequency analysis of Osse river using Gumbel’s distribution. Civil Environ Res 3(10):57–59

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chu X, Steinman A (2009) Event and continuous hydrologic modeling with HEC-HMS. J Irrig Drain Eng 135(1):119–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Arekhi S (2012) Runoff modeling by HEC-HMS model (case study: Kan Watershed, Iran). Int J Agric Crop Sci (IJACS) 4(23):1807–1811

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tahmasbinejad H, Feyzolahpo M, Mumipour M, Zakerhosei F (2012) Rainfall-runoff simulation and modeling of Karun river using HEC-RAS and HEC-HMS models, Izeh district, Iran. J Appl Sci 12(18):1900–1908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rao AR, Hamed KH (2000) Flood frequency analysis. CRC Press LLC, Baco Raton

    Google Scholar 

  17. Subramanya K (2013) Floods. In: Subramanya K (ed) Engineering hydrology. McGraw Hill, India, pp 296–331

    Google Scholar 

  18. Abdullah J (2013) Distributed runoff simulation of extreme monsoon rainstorms in Malaysia using TREX. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State University, CO

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Universiti Teknologi MARA and Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (grant number GGPM-2014-046). The hydrological data were provided by the Department of Irrigation and Drainage, Malaysia, and their assistance is highly appreciated. The authors also appreciate the comments from three anonymous reviewers that led to the improvement of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nur S. Muhammad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Abdullah, J., Muhammad, N.S., Mohamad Sharif, N.A. (2016). Estimation of Peak Discharges Using Flood Frequency Analysis and Hydrological Modeling System. In: Tahir, W., Abu Bakar, P., Wahid, M., Mohd Nasir, S., Lee, W. (eds) ISFRAM 2015. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0500-8_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics